引言:AI 与人类亲密关系的重塑
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 大家好,欢迎各位 TED 会员。我是惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯,TED 的策展人。很高兴能和大家一起参加今天的直播活动。随着科技日益融入我们的日常生活,它也在悄然重塑着一些深刻的人性特质:我们如何建立连接、如何体验亲密,以及我们如何理解人际关系。
从约会软件到 AI 伴侣,我们使用的工具不仅在影响我们与谁建立联系,还在影响我们对连接本身的期待。为了深入探讨这个时刻对性、浪漫乃至我们所有关系的意义,我们邀请到了处于这些对话最前沿的专家——性技术(Sex Tech)专家布莱恩尼·科尔(Bryony Cole)。你好,布莱恩尼。
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: Hello and welcome TED members. I'm Whitney Pennington Rogers. I'm a curator here at TED and I am thrilled to be here with you for today's live event. As technology has become more embedded in our daily lives, it's also quietly reshaping something deeply human. How we connect, how we experience intimacy, and how we understand relationships. From dating apps to AI companions, the tools we use are influencing not just who we connect with, but what we expect from connection itself. To dig deeper into what this moment means, not just for sex and romance, but for all of our relationships. Someone who has been at the forefront of these conversations, sex tech expert Brian E. Cole. Hello, Brian.
布莱恩尼·科尔: 你好。感谢邀请我。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Hello. Thanks for having me.
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 谢谢你来到这里,和我们聊聊我们所处时代的这种现实。我想当人们听到“性技术”或“AI 关系”这些词时,会觉得这是未来主义的,或者是某种非常边缘的东西。而你经常谈论现在的行业图景以及我们所观察到的现象。你能分享一下目前市面上的其他技术,以及人们在日常生活中使用它们的一些令人惊讶的方式吗?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: Yeah, thank you so much for being here with us to speak to sort of this realistic part of of of what the moment we're living in. You know, I think when people hear the terms sex tech or AI relationships, there is this this sense that this is futuristic or maybe something that's very fringe and you talk a lot about what the landscape looks like now and what we're seeing. Can you share some other technologies that are out there at this moment and and maybe some surprising ways people are using them in their everyday lives?
AI 伴侣的市场现状与多样化应用
布莱恩尼·科尔: 噢,是的。我的意思是,我觉得技术本身已经不再让我感到惊讶了,让我惊讶的是我们人类。就在过去的 2025 年,市场上开发并发布了超过 300 款 AI 伴侣应用。实际上,我发现那些功能已经不再那么有趣了。当然,未来我们会看到它们能追踪我们的眼球运动,它们现在已经能追踪语气之类的东西了。
真正令人惊讶的是市场上的应用数量、谁在使用它们以及我们如何使用它们。就像我之前说的,你稍微观察一下就会意识到,天呐,这不仅仅是陈词滥调里那个躲在车库里的男人在用,而是每个人都在用。
年轻人肯定用得越来越多,但也有感到孤独的老年人在寻求支持;既有精通技术的人,也有对技术不太灵光的人。人们将它用于护理,或者是失去了挚爱的人,或者是处于远距离关系中的人,还有神经多样化用户,或者正在经历悲痛和疾病的人。现在人们转向 AI 寻求陪伴的原因多种多样。
两周前我参加了一个 40 岁生日派对,我明显感觉到我们所有人都在这种情感时刻当众使用 AI。不仅是为了寻求陪伴,还为了写 40 岁生日演讲稿。当你参加一个本该反映你和朋友情谊的场合时,你会感觉到有些不对劲——你会想:“我觉得那家伙是用 AI 写的那段话。”我甚至听说过有人用它来写悼词。
在这些原本并不追求效率的关系中,我们突然会说:“天呐,这正在渗透进我的日常生活。”回顾三年前的前沿动态,我当时看到的是“好吧,我们都会用它来寻求陪伴”。但在过去的几个月里,这个观念发生了更大的转变。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Oh yeah. I mean I I think that I think the it's almost like the technology isn't surprising me anymore. It's us, right? So in the last last year in 2025, there were over 300 AI companion apps just developed and released on the market. And I actually don't find the features that interesting anymore. Um certainly in the future we'll see that they will be able to track our eye movements and you know they already track tone of voice those sorts of things. It's actually just the amount that are in the market and who is using them and how we're using them. So as I said before you know you can't you can't go too far without realizing oh my goodness this is actually not just the cliche guy in the garage. This is everyone. It's definitely young people are using it more and more, but also older people for support that are feeling lonely, people that understand technology as well as people that are a little less dextrous with it. It's people that have using it for caregiving or have lost a loved one or in long-distance relationships or neurode divergent users or people that are navigating grief illness. you know, there's all these different reasons now why people are turning to AI for companionship. And I think, you know, I was at a 40th um a couple of weeks ago and it became very obvious that we're all using AI for these emotional moments as well in front of people. So, not just for that companionship, but for writing a 40th speech. There's just there's just something you can tell when you you go to like a a a moment that's meant to be about you reflecting on your friend and this is going to be my you think I think I think that guy used AI to create that talk or you know even I've heard anecdotes of people using it to write eulogies. Um these things in relationships that were never meant to be efficient that suddenly we're saying oh my gosh this is this is infiltrating my daytoday relationships. I think when I look on the frontier, which is, you know, three years ago, that's what I was seeing was, okay, we're all going to use this for companionship. I think even in the last couple of months, that idea has shifted even more.
AI 家庭:当 AI 成为家庭成员
布莱恩尼·科尔: 这是一个窥视未来趋势的机会,特别是如果我们不更加小心的话。我们可以深入探讨关于护栏或我们需要自问的问题。但我现在看到的,也是媒体中经常出现的耸人听闻的故事,是关于人们决定与 AI 组建家庭。
所以这不仅是关于你的 AI 女友、男友,或者爱上 AI,或者为了陪伴而与 AI 约会。它现在成了之前专属人类领域的延伸。最近有一个故事,一个男孩决定想要一个 AI 妻子,他们想在未来收养一个人类孩子,抚养一个 AI 家庭。
我认为这在法律上很难实现,但我们已经看到了这些想法。人们在想:“我可以抚养一个家庭。”而且正如我在演讲中说的,这不仅仅是关于那些决定用它寻求陪伴或养家的“孤独男人”。
我们还看到了性别差异,女性也在使用它。在面向未来的语境中,面临生育问题、无法生育孩子的女性正在思考或讨论:抚养一个 AI 家庭意味着什么?如果我不能生下生理上的孩子,拥有 AI 孩子并进行模拟意味着什么?
所以我对人们决定如何使用它感到越来越惊讶,虽然技术已经在那儿了,我们无法把它关回盒子里,但人们的使用方式往往决定了下一次创新或功能的方向。
Original English
Bryony Cole: And this is really a a peak into what's around the corner, particularly if we don't be more careful, and we can get into that around the the guard rails or the questions we'll we'll ask ourselves. But I think what I'm seeing now and we're seeing always a good signal is what are these sensational stories in the media around this topic and it's about people deciding uh to have families with AI. And so it's not just about your AI girlfriend or boyfriend or your falling in love or you're dating an AI for companionship. It's now this extension of what was previously exclusively a human domain. And there was a recent story about a young boy who's decided he wants to, you know, have this AI wife and they want to adopt a human child in the future and raise um an AI family. Now, I think that's going to be a uh pretty difficult legally to do, but we're we're seeing those ideas. People are going, I could raise a family. And then, you know, as I said in the talk, this isn't just about, you know, the lonely men. you know that are that have decided to use this for companionship or for this idea of raising a family. We also have a gender split where women are also using this and in that sort of future facing context women that are facing fertility issues and can't actually have children are thinking or talking about what would it mean to raise an AI family. So if I can't have a child biologically, what would it mean to have AI children and simulating that? So I think that's where um I'm more and more surprised about how people, you know, the the technology is already here. Um we're not putting that back in the box, but how people are deciding to use it. And quite often that then dictates the next innovation or features we're seeing.
采纳障碍:隐私担忧与依赖风险
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 这里的容量非常大,看到这些现象并没有特定的模式,而是覆盖了各个层面,真是不可思议。当你考虑到采纳情况时,你是否看到对于那些接受较慢、或者有顾虑、或者对 AI 在陪伴方面的使用有疑问的人群,存在某些误解?对于那部分拒绝使用 AI 满足情感需求的人群,你观察到了哪些常见的误解?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: I mean, there's there's so much there and it's incredible to see that that there aren't really these patterns of it's always this person doing this thing that it really does seem like it's ranging the gamut. And and when you think about adoption, are you are you seeing that there are certain misconceptions for people who maybe are slow to to pick this up or are have some hesitation or uh you know questions around the usage of of AI in this way and companionship? What are some of the I guess the common misconceptions you're seeing coming from that segment of the population um that are resistant to using AI for for emotional needs.
布莱恩尼·科尔: 我现在想到了我的父亲,他刚满 80 岁。他会打电话给我说:“小布(Bri),你能代表我用 ChatGPT 处理这件事吗?”
但我认为,这种阻碍更多在于“我该怎么用它”,但它现在变得如此易用,以至于采纳曲线比 10 到 15 年前社交媒体刚出现时要快得多。那时人们不明白什么是状态更新,该如何使用社交网络,我也接到过我父母打来的同样电话。
如果你是一个批判性思想家,并且已经跨过了采纳门槛,开始使用它并发现:“噢,这实际上提供了很多支持,几乎是无摩擦(frictionless)的互动”,那么这种阻力或怀疑更多在于:“噢,这感觉有点榨取性(extractive),接下来会发生什么?”
我在聊天室里看到一些问题,比如当我的内心想法突然落到一个技术平台上时,这意味着什么?所以首先是关于数据去向的问题。我们以前在 Facebook 软件或下载应用时也见过这种情况,会有那种“天呐,我得阅读条款和协议”的想法。但作为一个社会,我们中的很多人很快就跨过了那道坎,直接按“同意”。但起初确实有这种阻力。
第二点是当我们在使用它时,我们会想:“我不知道这是否真的感觉良好”,因为你意识到你对这个平台的依赖。因为它感觉太好了,实际的牺牲是什么?代价是什么?如果我用 AI 满足心理咨询需求而不是找人类咨询师,如果我用它处理职场或友谊中的困难局面,这会如何削弱人与人之间的纽带?我认为这就是我们在思考的:这究竟是提供支持,还是在过度榨取?
我希望人们能采取的下一步是思考:它对我有什么用?它是否可以作为练习脆弱感、表达需求或建立某种情感素养的工具?我的底线在哪里?这说得通吗?
Original English
Bryony Cole: Um I'm thinking of my dad right now who just turned 80 who you know who will ring me up and be like Bri can you use chat JPT for this thing for me on my behalf. Um but I think uh I actually think it's more that there's a resistance more there around well how do I use it but it's becoming so easy to use that um you know that adoption curve is so much quicker than if we say 1015 years ago when social media first came out and people didn't really what's a status update how do I use this social network and I was getting those same calls from my parents. I think if you're you're a critical thinker and you you're already over the adoption curve and you've started using it and seeing oh this is actually um providing a lot of um support almost frictionless um in terms of how how I can talk to AI the the um the resistance the skepticism there is more about oh this feels a bit extractive what is going to happen here and I saw some questions in the chat there about you know what happens when suddenly uh diarrhea most innermost thoughts are now landing on a tech platform and what sort of what does that mean for me so I think there's first a question where people are sort of thinking about this in terms of where's my data going which we already saw with things like Facebook or you know when people are using phones and downloading apps there was that oh I' got you know I've got to read the terms and conditions and and very quickly as a society we kind of have gotten over that a lot of us and going oh yeah just press agree but there's that initial resistance there and then I think the the second thing we think about when we're using this we go I don't know if this actually feels good is because you're recognizing the dependency that you have on the platform because it feels really good what what's the actual sacrifice what is the cost here if I go and use AI for my therapy needs needs rather than um talking to a therapist. If I use it for a difficult situation at work or friendship, how is that going to weaken the bonds? And I think that's what we're thinking about. Oh, is this actually supportive or is is this extractive? And I think the next step I'd like people to take is, you know, thinking about, well, how could it be useful to me? Is it, you know, a tool to practice vulnerability or articulating my needs or building some sort of emotional literacy? And where does that line exist for me where I can sort of hold back? Um, does that make sense?
合成亲密 vs. 人类亲密
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 完全说得通。听起来,关于你演讲中提到的**合成亲密(synthetic intimacy)**究竟是会取代人类亲密,还是作为一种支持工具,这取决于个人决定。你认为这不应该是“非此即彼”的关系,它们可以以某种方式协同工作。
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: Perfect sense. And and it sounds like in the argument of whether or not synthetic intimacy as you you call it in the talk uh becomes something that replaces human intimacy or is a thing that you know we use to support it is a personal decision that that you don't think that it should be either or that it's it seems like they can work together in one way or another.
布莱恩尼·科尔: 那是理想情况,对吧?我希望看到一个非常混合(hybrid)的未来。会有一些人在关系内部使用 AI,也会有人说:“我不希望那样,我想把这段关系留给我自己,我想用我自己的人性去了解对方,而不是用 AI 或用它来解决和伴侣的争执。”
我认为这是一个个人选择,就像社交媒体一样——你不能否认它,感觉非常相似。我们现在已经看到了社交媒体成瘾的警告信号,现在在 AI 伴侣成瘾上也看到了。我认为这将回归到我们自己建立的个人框架:我该如何使用它?我想花多少时间在上面?
显而易见,科技公司的产品是为参与度设计的。现在 Instagram 可能会有弹出窗口,提醒你已经花了多长时间,该退出了。AI 伴侣应用也已经在这么做了,他们在设置所谓的安全保障。但最终,作为人类,我们需要决定在什么时间点我觉得这是我想每天使用的,还是每周一次,并为我们自己创建这些规则和边界。
最简单的方法是反思:我如何使用社交媒体?对此我感觉如何?我将如何使用 AI?我对此感觉如何?
Original English
Bryony Cole: That's the hope, right? But I think that's the hope because I think we're looking towards a future where it is very hybrid and there are going to be people that will you know use AI inside their relationships and there will be people that will say you know I don't want to do that because I can already see that I want to keep this relationship just for me and I want to use my my own humanity to decide about this person rather than using AI or to settle an argument with my partner. I do think it's a personal choice just like it's you know I keep coming back to social media but you can't deny it it feels very similar and we're seeing those warning signs of you know social media addiction now we're seeing with AI companionship addiction I think it's going to come back to our own personal frameworks we build of like how do I want to use this how much time do I want to spend on this because quite I mean obviously the tech companies are built are building this for engagement and we see, you know, now Instagram might have like popups where you've spent this much time on Instagram. Now's the time to jump off. AI companionship apps are already doing that as well. So they're already putting in I guess safeguards you could call them. But ultimately it's it's on us as as humans to decide at what point do I feel this is you know something I want to use every day or once a week and and create those rules and those boundaries for ourselves. And that's that's really important to start thinking about that. And I think the easiest way to think about that is how do I use social media and how do I feel about that? How am I going to use AI? How do I feel about using AI?
AI 对职场关系的影响
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 你在演讲最后给了我们一些很好的问题来帮助我们做决定。你提到这已经扩展到了浪漫关系之外,挑战了我们对友谊或其他关系的假设。你认为这在哪些方面颠覆了我们对更广泛连接的思考,而不仅仅是从浪漫的角度?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: And you give us some great questions towards the end of your talk that can help us decide these things for ourselves which are which is really helpful. And you started to talk a little bit um about how this sort of expands beyond romantic relationships that this is just opening the door for helping us to understand what AI could mean for relationships beyond this and how it challenges our assumptions about friendship or you know other relationships. What do you think are are some of the ways that this is upending the way we think about connection more broadly and not just from a lens of romance?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 我认为生活中的每一段关系都会受到影响,因为人们正将 AI 作为支持或替代工具。
当然包括约会和亲密生活,我们也谈到了养育孩子。育儿就是一个很好的例子,我经常听到人们说:“噢,我不知道该不该在这个时候换尿布,所以我问了 ChatGPT。”我们正在把所有这些微小的瞬间**外包(outsourcing)**出去。
想想看,从你醒来到晚上枕头落下,你会和多少不同的人交谈?我认为最容易被忽视的地方——这很有趣,因为我们在工作中已经大量使用它了——就是职场。
当职场关系转向远程办公、居家办公的情况时,当我们把那些困难的对话或情感时刻外包给 AI 时,我们该如何建设团队?在工作中,我们仍然需要培养与同事之间的健康关系和团队动力。如果莎莉觉得我的某些工作做得不好,但她不想给出诚实的反馈,而是输入 AI 伴侣来处理这件事,或者用它来处理工作中的倦怠压力,会发生什么?我认为我们还没有意识到这对组织将产生巨大的影响。
再看看组织中的领导者,他们如何使用自己的声音和本真性(authenticity)?我不太喜欢用“本真性”这个词,因为它被滥用了。但如果这些领导未来使用 AI 来完成所有的愿景规划、发声,并把那份真实的声音外包给 AI,我认为我们将开始失去那些让公司基业长青、创造惊艳产品和服务的东西——那就是我们的人性。
这听起来可能违背任何商业最佳实践,但在工作中不仅关乎效率,还关乎什么让我们成为一支伟大的团队。真正的愿景之所以具有远见卓识,是因为它们源自内心、源自我们的创造力、想象力、直觉,这些都是独特的人类特质。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Yeah, I think I mean in every facet, every relationship in our life I think is going to be impacted by this because people are using AI as a tool to either support or sometimes replace this. So yes, um certainly in dating and in relationships with our intimate lives also with we talked about raising children and families and talking to our you know parenting is a really good example where I talk to people and oh yeah I didn't know if I should change the nappy at this time so I asked chat GPT. So, we're outsourcing all those little moments. And if you think about from when you wake up to you put your pillow on the head at night, how many different people you're talking to, I think the biggest place we're not looking right now, which is kind of funny because we use this so much at work anyway, is um yeah, is at work and with our colleagues. And I think those relationships at work, especially because, you know, we've moved towards this remote work, working from home situation. How do we build teams when we're outsourcing a lot of those difficult conversations or those um emotional moments to an AI? Because at work, we're still it's still about fostering healthy relationships with your colleagues and with team dynamics. And what happens when Sally decides that she doesn't like some of my work and she doesn't want to give the the honest feedback and instead puts that into an AI companion and deals with that or deals with her burnout as stress from work. Um I think we're not clocking that that is actually going to have a huge impact on organizations. And then if you look at the the the leaders in organizations, how are they how are they using their voice and their own? I always struggle to to use authenticity because I think it just gets overused. But if we're talking about organizations leading the future and those leaders are using AI to do all those the visionary work and have the voice and have that true authentic voice and they're outsourcing that um to the AI. I think we're starting to lose a lot of the stuff that that makes companies and building amazing products and services great is just like the humanity and our ideas. It's not just and this sounds very contrary to any, you know, business um best practice. It's not just about efficiency when we're at work. It is about, you know, what makes us a great team together. And what makes visions truly visionary is they come from somewhere inside. And I think from the heart, you know, from from our creativity, our imagination, sense of intuition, these things that are distinctly human qualities.
重建“现代村落”:科技作为连接纽带
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 我们的会员提出了很多问题。会员希拉(Sheila)提了一个很好的问题:如果 70% 的 Z 世代(Gen Z)都将与 AI 聊天机器人建立坚定的关系,我们该如何重建现代村落(modern village)?这与你提到的社区、职场和政府空间有关。如果 AI 在生活中无处不在,我们该如何重建这种社区感?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: I mean, and and you get into this um a little bit in the talk and we we have so many questions that are coming in from our members and I'll start to bring some of those in now. In fact, there's a good one from Sheila um which feels connected to this. You know, she mentions that if 70% of Gen Z are going to have committed relationships with AI chatbots, how can we rebuild the modern village, which I think also connects to what you're suggesting around other spaces too, other places of community, workplaces and you know, general governments and that sort of thing. How do how do we rebuild that if if AI becomes such a presence in life?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 这是一个非常美妙的问题,希拉。我喜欢“重建村落”这个想法。我认为重建并不是要倒退。我们无法回到过去的村落。所以当生活中有了 AI 的存在,我们必须更新对“村落”的看法。
历史上,村落的美妙之处在于它们的自然存在——是因为地理位置上的接近。我们在同一个空间,有着共同的关怀。但在今天,重建村落并不是一个我们碰巧发现的地方,而是一种实践。
构成村落的关键是互动频率。无论是接送小孩,还是遇到同一个咖啡师,互动的持续性至关重要。这不仅仅是去参加一次性的交友活动。
埃丝特·佩雷尔(Esther Perel)曾说过:“我们现在对一个人的期待,原本是需要一个村落才能满足的。”她在谈论生活中我们需要依赖的不同关系。而现在的更新版是:我们期待 AI 能成为那个村落。
我们需要审视自己的关系生态系统并对此保持高度自觉。村落是一种实践。我们应该优先考虑生活中的非浪漫关系——无论是近处的朋友,还是计划给远方的朋友打电话。我们要思考哪些非浪漫关系可以构成我们的村落。我们曾经陷入一个误区,认为“只要有爱人就够了”,现在又觉得“只要有 AI 伴侣就够了”。
虽然 AI 可能会让人感到害怕,但也蕴含着机会。机会在于我们如何将技术作为连接组织。比如用 AI 来安排 Facetime,或者寻找有趣的新方式来和我们的村落共享体验。所以要思考如何利用 AI 的生产力来服务于你的村落。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Yeah, what a beautiful question, Sheila. I love this idea of rebuilding the village. And I think um when we talk about rebuilding, we're not talking about going backwards. There's no going back to the village. So, we have to update what we what we really think a village could be now that we have this presence in our lives. And I think it's um you know what's historically so beautiful about villages is they just sort of existed. It was about proximity. We were in the same place and space and there was this level of shared care there. I think today rebuilding a village, a village isn't like a place that we just um happen upon that we find because we're there. It's actually a practice. A village is something we practice. And what makes a village is frequency of interaction. So that consistency of whether it's I don't know the school pickup or the same barista, those sorts of things that that's so important that we have that frequency of interaction. It's not just a one-off event that we're going to to meet new people. I think the other thing is, you know, this is such a great um sort of quote by Esther Pel comes to mind about villages of like we expect from one person today what we used to receive from a village and she's talking about all these different relationships in our lives that we can depend on not just this one person and now I think the update is instead of we expect from a village you know we expect this AI to be that we actually have to look at our ecosystem of our relationships and be really intentional about that, right? This is some this is a village as a practice and so in that we want to we want to take like the non-romantic relationships in our life and and prioritize them as well. So whether that's friendships that are within proximity or you know scheduling calls with friends that are long distance or having that practice of who are the other non-romantic relationships in our life that can also provide a village and being really thoughtful about that. I think that's that's something that yeah we we sort of fell off the deep end when we thought just our lover is going to do everything and now we think oh our AI companion lover is going to be this village. I think the other thing to think about without you know I always try to sort of tread the cross the bridge really from like okay AI is not terrible but it's it can I mean it's it can be scary but it's also got these opportunities is okay well what is the opportunity here with rebuilding a village and with technology how can we use the technology as the connective tissue whether that you know is scheduling the facetime I want to say some some benefits of using a AI companion to schedule in these friendships or find new fun novel interesting ways to have shared experiences with our village is also really useful. So thinking about yeah those frequencies of interaction those that ecosystem of all our other relationships in our life that are human and and um making sure they're frequent and then figuring out well how does how does AI companions fit in this and is it the is it as a scheduling tool is it what is the what is the way I'm going to use AI in a productive way to make my village
孤独感、连接感与 AI 的局限
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 我喜欢你勾勒的这幅图景。我们原本依靠许多不同的人来处理不同的事情,后来收缩到一个人的空间,而现在我们可以借由 AI 的支持将其再次拓宽,甚至是定制化你的村落。
但我好奇,在定制化以完全契合你需求的过程中,我们会失去什么吗?那种“无法掌控”的元素是否也具有重要的意义?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: I I love that and I love you you sort of drawing this picture of you know, having the village that we rely on people, different people for different things and then that sort of narrows to this space of one person for everything. And now we're in this moment where we can broaden it back out. Um, and in a lot of ways it sounds like really customize what your village looks like using AI to support that like what you can get from certain people. And I I wonder in doing that are are there certain things that you think you lose uh in in those connections when you are customizing things in a way that really suits you? Is is there some element of not having control over that that is really meaningful?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 我认为**自发性(spontaneity)**和那些“难搞的事”才是建立伟大关系的关键。我们越来越想要定制化,但对我来说,那些意外的后果反而是建立人性的重要方式——比如我们出了岔子,反而增强了纽带。
但在利用 AI 进行个性化方面,比如发现我和朋友都喜欢瑜伽,那就安排进日程,这感觉很好。
妙丽尔(Muriel)问了一个相关的问题:法国有一句谚语叫“宁可孤独,也不要与坏人为伍”。AI 让人们想到了相反的情况:与 AI 建立关系,是否好过在孤立感中忍受孤独?
Original English
Bryony Cole: Oh, I I mean I do think that like spontaneity and things, you know, the the the tough stuff is actually what builds great relationships. I think the the you know, we more and more want customization. That's just that's just sort of what we've been designing for. But for me, just off the top of my head, I think yeah, those that other than like the things this the things that happen that are unintended consequences of our friendship of being out in the world of, I don't know, your dog running off and doing a poop on the neighbor's lawn or something like they're really important ways that we build our humanity and we slip up and we strengthen the bonds. Um, but I think in terms of using a tool like AI for personalization, for figuring out, hey, I really love doing this practice with yoga and so does this friend. Let's schedule that in or let's use this to to find out the best teacher. I'm Yeah, I mean that feels really good. And and Muriel asked a question connected to this as well. They mentioned that there's a French idiom that it's better to live alone than in bad company. Uh, and AI makes them wonder the opposite. Is it better to have a relationship with an AI than being alone with a sense of isolation? What's your feeling around that?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 当我听到“独自一人”时,我会想到当今世界常谈论的词——孤独感(loneliness)。孤独并不在于独自一人,而在于断开连接(disconnection)。所以问题的核心在于连接,以及什么是丰富的连接。
虽然 AI 伴侣可以提供连接,但在丰富度和深度上,它无法像人类那样“见证”我们。虽然它能识别你快要落泪了,或者听出你焦虑的语气,这是一种镜像反馈形式的连接,但它无法擦去你的眼泪,也无法提供能加深连接的真正宽恕。
我认为这比完全断开连接要好吗?我确实这么认为。研究案例发现它确实帮助人们度过了艰难时期。这不一定是持续数年的关系,可能是一个正在经历更年期的人,或者是刚失去亲人的人。
在今天的世界,人类是疲惫的,有时我们对维系关系也感到倦怠。虽然我谈论人性的魔力,但如果 AI 伴侣能提供某种程度的陪伴,我认为那是值得的。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Well, I mean, when I hear the word alone, and I think we talk about this so much today, right, in the in our world is loneliness. And I think about how loneliness isn't really about being alone. It's about disconnection. And so I think the the question there is about connection and what makes a rich connection um and while an AI companion can provide a connection in terms of richness and depth you know it can't it can't witness us in the way that humans can but it can provide perhaps a different way you know an AI can recognize when you know if it's got the the visual compatibility with It can recognize when you're about to tear up or it can hear the tone in your voice when you're anxious. And that is a form of connection of being able to mirror and respond, but it can't wipe away your tears or it can't, you know, offer you um a genuine forgiveness in a way that I think deepens connection. Do I think it's better than um total disconnection? actually do. I think that it it's you know we have seen these cases in the research that find that it has actually helped people through difficult times. Now that doesn't necessarily have to be for years or in a relationship. It might be someone navigating menopause or navigating the loss of a loved one or these really hard moments where I think in today's world humans are burnt out and sometimes we are burnt out on relationships and showing up for each other and even though I talk about it being the magic I think if there's an ability for um you know you to have a connection and go through a hard time and have that companion provide some level of that I do think that's worth something. And I think for the people on the other side that are trying to support you, if it allows them to show up more fully and show up for you as well, I think that's that's a useful um use of having a connection with AI. Maybe not a deep reciprocal one, but um certainly a reflected one.
伦理与安全:谁在设计我们的亲密感?
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 这一切都引出了关于安全、保障的问题。但在这些工具更深入地嵌入我们的生活之前,我们现在应该提出哪些伦理问题?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: Well, all of this raises a lot of questions around safety, security, and you tal touched on some of this already. Um, but even bigger questions around morals and what what's acceptable when we're thinking about approaching AI relationships, what do you think are some of the ethical questions we should be asking right now at this moment before these tools become even more embedded into our lives?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 谁在设计它们?谁在幕后?我们要记住这是一种商业模式。我们已经习惯了向某些东西倾诉内心深处的想法,起初是日记,然后是互联网论坛。
但这个时刻将决定:我们要对这些公司提出更高要求吗?我们该如何分享这些想法?隐私和数据是非常重要的问题。那是你最脆弱的想法,即使对方感觉像个人类,它们其实是商业模式的一部分。
**知情同意(consent)**也是核心。我们要问,谁在编写这些大语言模型(LLMs)?未来需要各方参与——少数群体、护理者、心理学家,不能只有技术人员。需要深刻理解人类体验、同理心和心理学的人。
目前很大程度上还是“西部荒野”,几乎没有护栏。政府和机构正在努力追赶并制定立法。但在过渡期,自律就是关口。我们要自问如何使用这些工具,并邀请更多背景多样化的人进入这些公司。
Original English
Bryony Cole: It's you know who's designing them who is behind this and remembering this is a business model you know I think we already are in the practice of telling our most deepest darkest thoughts to you know it started I guess with with journaling right and and writing them down or with people that we barely know with strangers we already do this um and certainly then we saw with the internet and for we're in the practice of this but I think we this this moment in time will either decide well are we going to demand more of these companies or are we going to think about how we're going to share those thoughts because I think that's a really important question around data and privacy that we've been asking technology companies for for a very long time and I wonder and hope that this is the moment that we wake up and ask well where is that going because that is the the most vulnerable thoughts that that we told and they're with a company even if it feels like a human. They're they're part of the business model. And so I think that's really important. I think consent is is embedded in that and important to ask and who are the people that are designing these and that are writing these LLMs. And we need for a future to involve well really to involve everyone but to involve so many different points of view and you know minority groups, caregivers, psychologists. This can't just be people with technical skills. Needs to be people that have deep understanding of the human experience and of empathy and of psychology to really understand how how do we navigate this in an ethical way and you know for the most part it is the wild west. It reminds me very much of my earlier career in sex tech where it kind there aren't there are very few guard rails and people are scrambling, governments, institutions are scrambling to catch up and to legislate around this. But in the interim, I think the the gate needs to be with ourselves of how we're going to use use these tools and how do we invite more people in with more diverse experiences um into these companies to to look at them and to to build with them because there's no no not building them. They're happening.
AI 与性教育:打破禁忌的补充工具
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 詹妮弗(Jennifer M)提了一个有趣的问题:是否可以利用 AI 对那些羞于与成年人沟通的青少年进行性教育?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: H I mean I think in in thinking about these conversations around how AI can you know sort of having these conversations around safety and and for users of this it definitely brings up questions around children or people who are even young adults who are not used to navigating some of these complex spaces. Um and we have an interesting question from Jennifer M around whether there's a way to harness AI for sex education for young people who are uncomfortable speaking to adults. How do you how do you think about it that use for it?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 确实有公司在做这件事。利用技术帮助人们理解那些禁忌话题是一个很好的用途。人们可以安全地提问:“我这样正常吗?”这对于理解性健康、性传播感染(STI)非常有帮助,特别是孩子们觉得尴尬的问题。
但我认为这应该只是一个补充。性教育课程中缺失的部分恰恰是关于人性的——倾听、沟通、临场感、困难对话。这种与伴侣沟通的关键技能仍然需要人类元素。
性教育专家之所以出色,是因为他们通过给予“许可”来谈论这些事情。我们不仅在性与亲密方面需要这种技能,在普通关系中也需要。人们调侃 Z 世代由于过度使用 AI 而无法阅读社交线索或肢体语言。所以我提倡混合模式:它是一个极好的知识开发工具,但必须与保持人性的特质相结合。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Yeah, I mean there's a company at the moment, Mojo, that are doing this for sex therapy. And I think I think it is I think there are great uses of and we've seen this previously with technology and tools to allow people to understand topics that are taboo, that are off limits, that feel like, oh my gosh, am I normal? um and be able to ask someone about that in someone being, you know, in this case AI um in a way that feels safe. And so, yes, there there's a great opportunity for that. And we're already seeing that that exists. And I think it's um it's really helpful for for things like sexual health and STI and understanding those things that especially children feel a little bit embarrassed to ask. I do think it should be a supplement though. I think part of sex education, so much of the the curriculum that's missing is actually about the things that make us human. It's the listening, it's the communication, it's the showing up, it's the having the difficult conversations, it's asking if you got that that STI test. And so that critical skill of being able to communicate with a partner, I think it's still there still needs to be that human element. And that's why sex educators and sexologists are so fantastic because the way they talk about these things to young kids and deliver it is in a way that gives people permission. And I actually think we're going to need more of that skill, not just around sex and intimacy, but around relationships. I see that with with kids now. And we joke about the Gen Z stare, right? and people not being able to read social cues or have that body language that's only exacerbated by using AI and and not having those cues of learning body language and physical touch and and having those um difficult conversations. So I would say yes and hybrid model absolutely it's an incredible tool just like the internet has been for developing our knowledge but it also needs to be paired with the things that keep us distinctly human and in relationship
保持“人性化”:好奇心与当下的力量
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 艾希莉(Ashley M)问:“我们该如何让 AI 公司根据知情同意原则来训练模型?他们的动力是什么?”
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: well in thinking about sort of ensuring that companies are really thoughtful about security and safety in developing these products. Uh Ashley M asks, "How do how do we get AI companies to train their LLMs on on consent principles?" You know, what what what's the incentive for them to do that?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 动力来自公众压力。回顾社交媒体的历史,我们可以看到哪些有效,哪些无效。像“人道技术中心”(Center for Humane Technology)这样的组织做得非常出色。公众运动是我们作为普通人唯一的杠杆。
彼得(Peter O)问,如果担心最私密的想法被 AI 记录并被永久使用,你现在的看法是什么?
Original English
Bryony Cole: Pressure from public pressure, you know, and again, I think we just look back to what's worked and what's hasn't. And there's plenty that hasn't still with social media. Um but you know I think organizations like the Center for Humane Technology are doing an incredible job and that activism is you know the pressure point is the only sort of lever that we can pull on as everyday people who aren't in the companies and aren't driven by the bottom line to demand that and to ask for that. And you know, sometimes that means using using your own um the way you use it or not use AI to to send that message. But I think that's that's sort of what I look to and and try to be a voice for is it's asking for that. There's there are so many questions in here and we won't get to all of them that are connected to this idea of safety and security and and I think that this just speaks to what you're suggesting like in thinking about these conversations around social social media and people really having real concerns around privacy. Um, I'll po pose one to you though here that I think uh is useful for us to to to think about is is Peter O asks if uh if you're worried about our most intimate thoughts being recorded and used by our AI friend provider, you know, into the future forever. What where where does your um where does your thinking fall in that space right now?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 是的,我也担心。但我也看到 AI 正在成为我们的延伸。它能听见我们的想法,在我们耳边低语。你甚至不需要拿起屏幕,它就挂在你的脖子上。
对某些人来说这是乌托邦,对很多人来说这是反乌托邦。现实将落在中间。最重要的是记住,分享内心想法是一项需要我们自己发展的技能。在将其外包给科技之前,我们需要先学会与自己相处,与他人相处。你是否想要一个万物皆“自动”、万物皆“高效”的世界?这是一个个人决定。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Um it it does I mean yes I am worried and I also look at our usage of you know things like like everything that we do already with the apps and things and I think people are going to do this people are going to use these tools and you know have this experience where AI will have access like with friend to their deeper thoughts. In fact, it won't really be an AI companion in many ways. It will be an AI extension of ourselves, right? That can almost hear our thoughts and whisper in our ear as we're walking down a busy street. And then, you know, there's there's not even a need to pick up a screen and to text that AI. It's actually happening with, you know, a little chip here. I think that you know or the friend which if you haven't seen that is sort of a necklace that lives around your neck and takes in your whole world and so this is I would say to Peter this is already happening people are already using this I think in the future where we're going to be having these conversations not as I've fallen in love with my AI but actually AI is an extension of me some people are going to think that's utopia a lot of us are going to think that's dystopian and choose not to use it. And I think the reality is the throughtopia is it's going to land somewhere in the middle where yes, there will be a lot of, you know, movement before we get to that place. But I think there will be people that think that that's amazing. But the throughper is there's probably going to be some good and there's going to be some terrible stuff that will happen and this will be the new normal. And so the most important thing we can we can do right now is remember that intimacy and our innermost thoughts and sharing those that is a skill that we and a system that we need to develop for ourselves before we start outsourcing it to technology and making it automatic. It is something that we practice and learn how to do and get comfortable with ourselves before we do it with others. And how comfortable are we with a world in which yeah everything is automatic. Does everything is efficient including our thoughts and our needs and and do we want to live in that world and it'll be a personal decision.
未来展望:亲密关系操作系统
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 展望未来 5 到 10 年,如果我们做对了,技术如何能让更深层的连接或情感福祉成为可能?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: Well speaking to scared everyone yet everyone's like oh my goodness. But but also you know I think that there are a lot of opportunities here it's it which you highlight throughout this conversation and in the talk um and and I mean thinking about the future if you think just even five 10 years ago there's so many things that you've highlighted that are distinctly human traits and I think that there are a lot of people who are designing these technologies who hope to find ways to have AI take on these traits that feel distinctly human. So, so if if we get this right and you know as a society, what do you think technology could make possible in terms of deeper connections or emotional well-being with AI?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 我们已经看到了积极的一面,比如作为心理健康护理或处理悲痛的中间步骤。
我最想强调的是,亲密关系不是高效的。我们不应该希望它们高效。未来的大趋势将是非效率(inefficiency)。缓慢的关系是一种奢侈。慢慢构建、感受不适。
对于年轻一代来说,“慢”是一个陌生概念,因为一切都是随叫随到。我们要学习何时撤掉技术。在那些需要情感缓解的时刻,我们可以使用 AI,但希望这能让我们在真实关系中表现得更好。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Yeah, I think I think we're already seeing the the positives there and and that you know it is you know the the step in between using a therapist. So the mental health care or the grieving process or you know going through those uncomfortable situations where we do we can't call a friend or we do you know keep looping on the same thought like today we see a lot of people using a lot a lot a lot using um AI companions through breakups and that you know instead of going to your friend and talking adnauseium about that breakup there is a step in between and so I think um there is this moment where we go, okay, it's not a replacement, but how can we use this for positives in our lives that that provide um a bit of reprieve? Um they're they're sort of the the elements that I'm hopeful of while still retaining our humanity, you know. But I think the the point I keep coming back to is just intimacy relationships, they're not efficient. We shouldn't want them to be efficient. And so how do we if we just like take the technology off the table for a second? I think a big trend in the future is going to be inefficiency. It's it's a luxury already, but what does it look like to have slow relationships? What does it look like to build in a way that feels a little bit uncomfortable and a like slowing everything down? And I think that's sort of where I'm hopeful in the future is that we can we can take a bit of that and that actually feels good. That feels different. And for younger generations, when I talk to them, that's a foreign concept because everything's on demand. And so, how do we how do we learn when to take technology off the table? And oh, what is it like? What does it feel like to go slow? Because that's like the best best other things about human relationships when it's, you know, feeling a little bit slow. And then in those moments where we need relief, emotional relief, we can we can use companions and with the hope that it makes us better in relationships. It makes us better humans. That's the optimistic view that we always see with companies. Oh, you know, you you download this and you'll learn how to date better. But the onus will always be back to you. Am I using this to practice a conversation? Am I using this to just completely make it efficient and outsource it?
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 最后,你能告诉我们接下来有什么令人兴奋的计划吗?
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: Well, it it sounds like an answer to um this question from Brian L about how humans can uh can humans ever be as compelling or desirable as the best AI will become. Um and you know, it sounds like the answer is that that's not the goal, right? For us to be as the same as AI but to contribute something different. And so I I mean I wonder feel like from the place of how we keep up is is there something we should be trying to do to keep up here? Yeah, I think um you know the these these like the AI relationship and the human relationship really speaks to two different sides of our hearts and we keep we keep sort of and which is so normal right now is we keep fusing them together and thinking about replacement and you know it does do a lot of a lot of the the the the ideas of relationship that we thought and intimacy that we we previously have had from humans. But I think we need to remember that this is a different form of connection and this is um something that will be a different if we call it a relationship or connection different. It's distinct. It offers us different um benefits than being with a human, you know, and it can provide support. But I think when I think about yeah, real relationships, this idea, you know, we talk about friction, uncomfortable, like a part of all of that, the the the stuff that feels uncomfortable in the moment. It's the relationship is about a two-way transformation. And really, you can never have a two-way transformation with an AI companion. So, just really understanding how how we can start to in our minds conceive of these things as really two distinct relationships that will dominate the future, but seeing it as an entirely new category. And I think that helps also for young people and for when we think about education around these around relationships, right? I think there should be education and curriculums in school that are about what does it look like to have a healthy relationship with AI just like what does it look like to have a healthy relationship and sex education and all those things. I think this is where we need to start educating people on this is actually an a new column we've created of relationship and I think that's a really important way to prepare for the future. But what do you think are some practices that can help keep us grounded um in our own humanity in this moment but at any point uh in time? Yeah, I love that question. I think um I think it is when we Okay, so when you're using the technology, I do think it is asking is this bringing me closer to people in my life or is this actually isolating me further? Um, I think, you know, in relationships, I think there is a lost art that's happening at the moment of curiosity and of listening, of being a good listener because we're used to this world where everything is now on demand and, you know, efficient. I think um, if you were on on Valentine's Day, if you're with someone, um, you know, yes, use use AI to plan the date if you want. Um, I think a good conversation to have with your partner is how do you use AI? Do you have an AI companion? And to talk through how that feels. I think that's going to be a negotiation that we're going to have with every single relationship is is it cheating? How are you using it? How am I using it? What gender have you got? What voice? I think that's a really interesting discussion. Maybe not sexy enough for Valentine's Day, but I think it you put it on the agenda of something and then you know on and really this idea of curiosity and listening. It's about presence and we talk about it so much but I think that's the thing that feels sometimes hard to do. We've all got attention spans of goldfish. But how do we how do we stay present with that person? How do we read their their social, their facial expressions, their cues? Yes, technology will be better at doing it in the future, but I don't want to lose that skill. And how do I really feel into someone's energy? Because that's a human skill. That's something that we can do really well if we tap into it beyond conversation. There's a universal language there, energy, being in the room with someone, how that feels, how how do I feel? And so checking in with yourself, checking in with your partner. Doesn't have to be rocket science. Doesn't have to be this therapized, you know, version of questions, 20 questions, but just being present. It's important. Well, in this last minute um that we have, I I know that something really exciting came um out of the talk for you. So, could you tell us a little bit about what's next?
布莱恩尼·科尔: 好的。我正在把那些问题整理成一本书,我称之为**《亲密关系操作系统》(Intimacy Operating System)**。因为现在我们需要为自己拥有一个系统:我们需要问自己什么问题?问别人什么问题?
这本书探讨了未来亲密关系的路径,涵盖约会、结婚,也包括友谊、育儿和职场。我们该如何在一个存在两种截然不同关系的世界里航行?人性并不是我们要输给技术的东西,而是我们可以主动去设计的。
Original English
Bryony Cole: Yeah, great. Well, I continue to go down this rabbit hole and to to still talk to people that are at the frontiers and try and make sense of how do we do this? A lot of this conversation and a lot of the questions that we're getting at the moment is sensemaking because we don't have that guide, right? We don't have this way to navigate the world. And so, we're all trying to look to someone to have the answers. Tell me it's bad. Tell me I need to do this. Tell me I need to use it for five minutes. And so out of the TED talk and you know I shared those questions which are really just like the beginnings of a blueprint has become a book and talking about this guide which I call the intimacy operating system because it is a system now that we need to own for ourselves. It's like what are these questions that we need to ask ourselves? What are the questions we need to ask others and provide people with a pathway through using this in the future and what the future of intimacy looks like in every area of your life whether that is dating, falling in love, you know, getting married, but also with friendships and with parenting and with your colleagues at work. How do we navigate a world where there are these two distinct relationships and what does that mean for me? And so yeah, I'm really exciting to be writing a book on it and looking at intimacy as not something that we lose to technology because there are plenty of benefits, but something that we as humans can now actively design for.
惠特尼·彭宁顿·罗杰斯: 非常期待。感谢布莱恩尼分享你的见解。
布莱恩尼·科尔: 谢谢你,惠特尼。
Original English
Whitney Pennington Rogers: Well, I'm very excited to to see that and I I know so many others on this on this call are we didn't get to all of the questions. Um, but you answered so many. So, thank you so much, Brian, for for sharing your insights here and for this conversation. Thank you. Thanks, Whitney.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
公司/组织: TED, OpenAI, Center for Humane Technology