加拿大经济负担危机现状
[主持人]: Renee Sylvestre-Williams 是一位财经记者,也是 《单身税:给独身挣钱者的清醒理财建议》(The Singles Tax)一书的作者;Erin Kelly 是 Advanced Symbolics, Inc. 的首席执行官;Kristine Beese 是 Untangle Money 的创始人兼首席执行官。非常欢迎三位来到节目,大家最近过得怎么样?
Original English
[Host]: Renee Sylvestre-Williams is a financial journalist and author of the Singles Tax no nonsense Financial Advice for Solo Earners, and Erin Kelly is the CEO of Advanced Symbolics, Inc. Kristine Beese is the founder and CEO of Untangle Money. Great to have all three of you on the program. How are you all doing?
[嘉宾们]: 很好,很高兴能来。
Original English
[Guests]: Great. Great. Yeah. Great to have you.
[主持人]: 好的。Erin,我们先从你开始。请带我们了解一下 AI 民调机构 Polly 针对当前经济环境下“生活负担能力”所做的一些研究。人们显然正在挣扎。
Original English
[Host]: All right. We're going to start with you. Take us through some of the research AI pollster Polly found on affordability in this economy. People are struggling.
[Erin Kelly]: 是的,没错。我们在这里做了一项研究,观察有多少人表示他们正面临财务困难。当 Polly 对其进行分类时,她将其分为:严重困难、有些困难、没什么困难或“我很好”。我认为最令人惊讶的是,自 2021 年以来,表示“严重困难”的人数比例增长了多少。你看,在 2021 年,只有 8.7% 的人表示他们面临严重困难,而现在这个比例已经超过了四分之一,达到了 27%。
Original English
[Erin Kelly]: Yeah, exactly. So we did a research here and we looked at how many people said that they're having financial hardship. And when Polly divides it, she divides it up into major struggle, somewhat struggling, not really struggling or I'm fine. And I think what was most amazing first off is how much that percentage of people saying it's a major struggle has grown since 2021. So you see, in 2021, 8.7% of people said they were having a major struggle, and now it's over a quarter, 27%.
[主持人]: 那是 2021 年,我们当时还在谈论 新冠疫情(Covid),对吧?
Original English
[Host]: And that was Covid when we're talking 2021, right?
[Erin Kelly]: 是的。我不知道,我们可能需要进一步观察:是不是当时的疫情补贴帮助了大家?否则情况会更糟。我的意思是,显然会更糟,因为我们正经历一场大流行。但你看,这种困难程度真的在增长。当超过四分之一的人口表示每个月都面临“严重困难”时,这就是一场危机。我的意思是,这确实是一场危机。
Original English
[Erin Kelly]: So and I don't know, and you know, we'd have to go and look at it more. Did the Covid subsidies help people? Otherwise it would have been worse. I mean, obviously it would have been worse because we were having a pandemic. But you see how just it just really grows. And when more than a quarter of your population says every month it's a major struggle, that's a crisis. I mean, that is a crisis.
消费心理:Joy 与报复性消费
[主持人]: 好的。Christine,这项研究是否与你最近在客户身上看到的情况一致,当我们谈论“严重困难”时?
Original English
[Host]: All right. Well, Christine, with this research, does it align with what you're seeing with your clients these days when we're talking about major struggles?
[Kristine Beese]: 100% 一致。我们观察的是税后和扣除后的基础情况,我们让你的预算变得收支平衡。然后我们用你花钱的地方填充它。我们会计算固定成本,或者我们称之为“已承诺资金”(Committed Money)。然后我们从研究中知道,变动成本需要一定数额:比如食物、衣服、礼物等等一切。剩下的就是你可以投入到“未来的钱”中的部分,比如退休储蓄之类的。我们看到这些固定成本正在压缩你的“弹性资金”或变动支出,以及你为退休储蓄的能力。这确实非常困难,收支平衡已经跟不上成本和支出的需求了。
其中一件非常重要且有研究支持的事情是:在你的变动支出(食物、衣服、礼物等)中,你需要从中获得 “快乐”(Joy)。作为中产阶级的普通人,如果我们得不到快乐,我们就会进行所谓的 “报复性消费”(Revenge Spending)。我们可以忍受 3 到 5 年的紧缩日子——这就是为什么我觉得告诉年轻人要尽可能长时间地保持学生时代的生活方式很有趣。我们真的无法坚持超过 3 到 5 年。然后你就会报复性消费,抵消掉你之前所有的努力。你可能会陷入债务。这对人们来说真的很难。
Original English
[Kristine Beese]: 100%. You know, what we look at is on an after tax after deduction basis, and we make your budget square. And then we fill it up with the things that you spend your money on. And we do fixed costs or we call it committed money. And then we know from research that there's amount you need for variable costs. So food, clothes, gifts, all the things and everything else. And then what's left over is what you can put towards future money, retirement savings and things like that. And we see these costs just compressing your flex money or your variable spend and your ability to save for retirement. It's just it is very hard. And the square isn't keeping up with the demands for the costs and the spending. And one of the things that we talk about pretty that's really important to know and it's research backed, is that with your variable spending food, clothes, gifts, all the things and everything else, you need to get joy from this. As human beings in the middle income, if we do not get joy, we will do something called revenge spending. Okay, so we can do 3 to 5 years tight. So this is why I think it's interesting when we tell young people that they should live like they're a student for as long as possible. We really can't do it for more than 3 to 5 years. And then you will actually revenge spend and take away a lot of the hard work you've done. You might go into debt. It's really it is really hard for people.
[主持人]: 我在纸上记下了“快乐”这个词,并画了三道杠。当我们谈论“快乐”时,它到底长什么样?
Original English
[Host]: I'm marking the words joy on my paper triple underlined here. What does joy look like when we're talking about joy?
[Kristine Beese]: 它能从内部触动你的心弦,所以每个人眼中的“快乐”都不同。有趣的是,这确实是一个非常窄的区间。比如,Renee 可能非常喜欢把钱花在食物上,Erin 可能非常喜欢买衣服。但花在这些事情上的支出百分比其实是非常相似的。只是其中的类别发生了变化,而且它需要让你觉得自己在做一件对你来说很重要的事情。
所以,如果看一些常见的套路,它可能是咖啡,可能是牛油果吐司,也可能是女性经常被批评的接睫毛和做指甲。但它真的需要能打动你认为重要的东西,而且它会随着时间而变化。
Original English
[Kristine Beese]: It moves the dial for you internally so it looks different for everyone. And it was interesting. It is. It is a very tight band. But what you. So maybe Renee really likes spending on food. Maybe Aaron really likes spending on clothes. But the percentage of spend that goes to all these things is very similar. It's just the categories inside that change, and it needs to feel like you're doing something that is important to you. Right. So, you know, to if we look at tropes, it could be the coffee, it could be the avocado toast, it could be the eyelashes and nails that women are constantly criticized for. But it really needs to move the dial for what's important to you, and it changes over time.
[主持人]: 好的,Renee,请你补充一下。
Original English
[Host]: All right, Renee, I'll get you to add on that.
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: 我完全同意刚才的说法。问题在于,对话正在发生变化,但几十年来——Christine,你也可以告诉我你的看法——对话一直是“预算、预算、预算”。对吧?而这又回到了“报复性消费”上。一个人不可能在几个月甚至几年的时间里一直过着极其严苛的预算生活。因为接下来会发生的是,你得不到快乐,你深感不快乐,你花费大量精力去关注每一笔支出,然后下一秒,你就在报复性消费了。
“报复性消费”在疫情的第二或第三年变成了一个非常流行的词,因为人们真的厌倦了——一是被关在室内太久,尤其是在安大略省;二是有很多财务压力,因为有些人没在工作,虽然有 CERB(加拿大紧急响应补贴)之类的东西,但人们开始为了“找回感觉”而消费。
Original English
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: I completely agree with everything because the thing is, like, there's always there's it's the conversation is changing. But for decades. And Christine, you let me know as well. The conversation has been like budget, budget, budget, budget, budget. Right. And that goes back to revenge spending. Somebody cannot live on a stringent budget for months or years at a time, because what happens is you get no joy, you're deeply unhappy, you spend a lot of time very conscious about your spending, and then next thing you know, you are revenge spending. Revenge spending became a very popular term in what, year two or year three of the pandemic, because people were just so tired of one being indoors a lot, especially in Ontario. There was a lot of financial stress about, you know, because some people weren't working, some, you know, there was Cerb and all of those things that people just started spending in order to feel something.
牺牲与储蓄:家庭与单身的差异
[主持人]: 好的,Renee,我们暂且跳过报复性消费。我们要谈谈“牺牲”。Erin,关于人们为了维持生计正在牺牲什么,Polly 发现了什么?
Original English
[Host]: All right, Renee, we're going to move from revenge spending. We're going to talk about sacrifices. So Aaron, what did poorly find in terms of what people are sacrificing to get by right now?
[Erin Kelly]: 有些人的牺牲非常深刻。我的意思是,我们现在已经不仅仅是削减那些无关紧要的东西了。如果我们看看家庭,家庭正在牺牲度假。排在第二位的是储蓄——为退休做储蓄。父母们不再存钱了。
有趣的是,你在这里可以看到单身人士的支出。单身人士仍在继续储蓄。我认为这可能是因为他们没有“安全网”。也许夫妻之间有一种虚假的安全感,对吧?但对于夫妻来说,第二项被抛弃的就是储蓄。再往下看,是订阅服务和礼物。两组人都放弃了礼物,而对单身人士来说,这是第一位的。单身人士放弃了礼物和订阅服务。所以,是的,人们已经放弃了 Christine 提到的那些“快乐元素”,现在正进入削减基础生活物品的阶段,比如电视。
Original English
[Erin Kelly]: Well, some people are sacrificing very deeply. I mean, we're beyond we're beyond the fluff at this point. So if we look at families, families are sacrificing vacations. Number two is savings saving for retirement. Parents aren't saving. Now, what I found interesting in the right here, you'll see we have the single spending. The singles are continuing to save, and I think that's probably because they don't have that safety net. Maybe there's a false sense of security with couples, right. But so couples number two is savings is going out the door. And then you go down the list. Subscriptions and gifts both both groups giving up gifts for singles. That's number one. That's going out gifts and then subscriptions. And so yeah, I mean people are already giving up those joyful elements that Christine mentioned. And we're into basic things like television.
[主持人]: 好的。Renee,根据你对加拿大单身人士生活成本的研究,你如何看待这一点?
Original English
[Host]: Right. All right, Renee, help us interpret this with your research based on the cost of living for Canadians who are single. How do you how do you look at this?
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: 坦白说,当我看到这些幻灯片时,很多内容对我来说并不意外。但关于人们放弃储蓄的事实,我同意你的看法。我认为可能的情况是,夫妻们会觉得——尤其是如果你有年幼的孩子——“好吧,我们现在只是做一个短期的牺牲”。然后从长远来看,我们理想中应该能达到财务收入的巅峰期,从而能够赶上来。
单身人士仍在储蓄的事实告诉了我几件事:我认为很多单身人士意识到,无论情况如何,他们都必须储蓄。因为未来会有那些成本,对吧?退休、万一生病了,以及长期的自我照顾。此外,我还想补充一点,随着父母老去,单身人士可能成为他们唯一的照顾者。所以你必须有那个缓冲。单身人士仍在储蓄的事实让我感到欣慰。但度假的事也告诉我,很多人失去了释放压力、暂时远离工作的能力。这种工作与生活的平衡(Work-life balance)让我非常担心。
Original English
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: Honestly, when I saw those slides, a lot of it wasn't a surprise to me. Right? But the fact that people are giving up savings, I would agree with you. I think possibly it might be a case of couples are like, especially if you've got younger children, like, okay, we're just going to do this hopefully short term sacrifice. And then longer term we're ideally we should be reaching our peak financial earnings years, be able to catch up. The fact that single people are still saving tells me a couple things. I think a lot of single people realize that they do have to save, no matter what the situation is, because there's those costs down the road, right? Retirement. You know what, if you're ill down the line and all of those things long term, care for yourself. And again, I would also add probably somewhere down the line as parents get older, as a single person, you may be the sole caregiver for them. So you have to have that cushion. So the fact that single people are still saving reassures me, but also kind of like the vacation thing that tells me, like a lot of people are not getting that ability to, you know, get some stress relief, walk away from work. And that work life balance concerns me a lot.
创新居住方案:“黄金女郎”式共同养老
[主持人]: 好的。Christine,我想请你谈谈。关于“消费 vs. 削减”以维持生计,你现在给客户什么建议?
Original English
[Host]: Okay. Well, Christine, I want to get you in on there. What advice are you giving clients right now about spending versus cutting to get by?
[Kristine Beese]: 是的。所以我们会保护那部分“弹性支出”,即使现在花钱变得更难了。我们将大多数加拿大年轻家庭所处的阶段称为“全能年”(Do-it-all years)。有时候这个阶段还伴随着照顾老人。在这种情况下,钱实际上是不够用来做完所有事情的。所以我们看的是——虽然某些方面你可能觉得很压抑,但我认为至少有一些选择是好事。
我们会考虑推迟退休,或者在退休后找一份兼职工作。我们非常关注你可能在兼职中喜欢做的事情,然后是潜在的住房减持(Downsizing)。或者是 “黄金女郎”式退休(Golden Girls retirement)——虽然这并不适合所有人,但我们看到这在除美国以外的所有国家都是一种增长趋势。
Original English
[Kristine Beese]: Yeah. So we protect that flexible spending even though it may be harder to spend. We call it the do it all years that most, most couples with young families in Canada have. These do it all years. Sometimes it's with elder care as well. Where you're there just isn't. Actually, there's not enough money to do it all. And so what we look at is and it in some ways you can think it's depressing, but I think it's it's nice to have at least some options. We look at retiring later, having a part time job in retirement. We really focus on something that you might enjoy doing in part time and then potentially downsizing. Or the Golden Girls retirement, which isn't for everyone, but we. It is a trend we see in all countries other than the US. Increasing is people.
[主持人]: 给那些不熟悉的人介绍一下……
Original English
[Host]: People who aren't familiar. Yeah.
[Kristine Beese]: “黄金女郎”式退休,主要是指那些比伴侣长寿或是原本就单身的女性。她们把资源聚集在一起,和其他女性共同拥有或租一套房子。她们说,维修成本下降了,因为不是只有你一个人在打扫。她们说,家里总会有人在,而且这是一种自带的社交生活。所以喜欢它的人非常喜欢,有些人则非常不喜欢。这取决于个人。
Original English
[Kristine Beese]: Golden girls retirement. It's mainly women who outlive their partners or are single to start with. You know, collecting their resources together and owning or renting a home with other women. And they say the, you know, maintenance goes down because you're not the only one cleaning. They say there's always somebody there and then there's a built in social life. So it's people who like it, really like it. Some people really don't like it. So depends on it, depends on the person.
[主持人]: 我必须得问,像这样的事情有多现实?
Original English
[Host]: I got to ask how realistic is something like that?
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: 令人惊讶地现实。我书里关于住房的章节是最长的,里面有一整节专门讨论这种社区公共住房(Communal community housing)的情况。而且这种方式已经在国外实践过了。有一个在网上疯传的梗,说中国有七个女人买了一套房子一起住,对吧?
但在多伦多也有 Clarence Commons。大约 6 到 7 个人汇集了资源,办理了带保险的抵押贷款,买下了一个地方。你可以在书里读到。他们坐下来进行了一次非常透明的关于财务的对话:关于他们愿意在装修和维修上花多少钱,以及所有这些事情。还有加利福尼亚的 The Radish,他们汇集资源买了一块地,上面有多栋房子,住着家庭和孩子,他们现在正在出售。
Original English
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: Surprisingly realistic. The housing chapter in my book is the longest thing, and there's a whole section on sort of that communal community housing situation, and it's been done, okay, not abroad. So there was that whole meme that kind of went viral of seven women in China who bought a house. Yeah, right. And all of that stuff. But there's Clarence Commons in Toronto where they about 6 or 7 people pooled their resources, got a mortgage with the insurance and bought a place. And you can read it in the book. But they sat down and had a very transparent conversation about finances and how much they're willing to spend on renovations and repairs and all of that stuff. There is, I forget the radish in California, where they pooled their resources, bought a land, and there are multiple houses on it, right? Families, kids and all that. They're actually selling it right now as we're.
[主持人]: 听起来像是个“大院”(Compound)。
Original English
[Host]: Speaking compound.
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: 确实是某种形式的大院。还有一个叫 Single Women Living Together 的协会,它为低收入女性提供支持,主要在安大略省。这是一个资源平台,帮助那些想和别的女性搭伙租房的人。所以这些都是选择。人们都喜欢“黄金女郎”的场景。
Original English
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: It's a compound of sorts. And then there is an association called Single Women Living Together, which provides support for lower income women, mostly in Ontario. And what it is, it is a resource for women who are looking to partner up with other women and rent. So these are all options. And people love a Golden Girls scenario.
[主持人]: 挺合理的。
Original English
[Host]: Fair enough.
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: 但你说的对,这很复杂。因为当和所有这些人谈话时,你必须愿意在情感和财务上保持透明。正如 Single Women Living Together 的创始人 Pat 告诉我的,引起摩擦的往往不是大事,而是小事。比如政治观点,是的,但还有像某人可能想在凌晨六点开洗碗机,而另一个人不想,或者是食物的味道。
Original English
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: But you are right, it is complicated because when talking to all of these people, you have to be willing to be emotionally and financially transparent because as Pat, who founded Single Women Living Together, told me, it's not the big things that cause friction. It's the small things like politics, yes, but just things like somebody might want to run the dishwasher at like six in the morning. Somebody else might. Food smells.
[主持人]: 谁拿走了勺子和叉子?
Original English
[Host]: Who's taking the spoons and forks?
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: 是的,谁拿走了勺子和叉子。挺合理的,就是这类事情。
Original English
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: Yeah. Who's taking the spoons and forks? Fair enough. That kind of thing.
[主持人]: 让人回想起宿舍生活。
Original English
[Host]: Flashback to dorm living.
[Kristine Beese]: 的确是。
Original English
[Kristine Beese]: It is.
债务陷阱与税收系统的复杂性
[主持人]: 满满的回忆。我想让 Erin 也参与进来。我们听到的新闻很严峻,看到的数据也很严峻。但我们中许多人仍然照常生活。我很好奇,这中间是不是存在脱节?还是说人们也许是在无视它,甚至在某种程度上依赖债务?
Original English
[Host]: Flashbacks, right? I want to get Erin involved in this. We hear the news and it's grim. We see the data, it's grim. But many of us are still living as usual. And I'm curious, is there perhaps a disconnect, or are people perhaps ignoring it and maybe leaning into debt a little bit?
[Erin Kelly]: 哦,人们肯定在依赖债务。这一点毫无疑问。而有些人确实没感觉到——我的意思是,我们确实有那一小部分人口。他们知道通货膨胀上升了,但他们并没有那么接近破产边缘。但是,人们确实在依赖债务。
Original English
[Erin Kelly]: Oh, people are definitely leaning into debt. There's there's no question about that. And some people aren't feeling it. I mean that we do have that small slice of the population there. They know that inflation has gone up and stuff, but they weren't they weren't so close to the edge that, you know, but people are definitely leaning into debt.
[主持人]: 好的,Christine。
Original English
[Host]: All right Christine.
[Kristine Beese]: 是的,我也同意。实际上当我看到数据时,我很好奇当人们说他们没有削减储蓄时,是不是因为他们本来就没在存钱?我想深究一下,因为当我们与客户合作时,我们会强制讨论储蓄问题。但有时候,储蓄并不是现在正在发生的事。这是我担心的。
我不认为有足够的加拿大人理解债务是如何运作的,也不理解把钱“为你工作”与让钱“为别人工作”的区别。让钱为你工作意味着你投资的钱本身在生钱。我们会拆解你的贡献部分和非贡献部分(即投资回报)。如果你开始得足够早,投资回报会超过你投入的一半,这就是你如何负担得起退休生活的方式。
而当你的钱是在为别人工作时,你是在造福别人。你不是在让钱上升,而是在支付让它下降的成本。有一件事让我非常苦恼:当政府说“哦,我们延长了抵押贷款期限,所以住房更可负担了”。我就觉得,那实际上并不是“更可负担”,那是个误称。你现在是在要求人们支付更多的利息。你是在要求人们为银行工作得更辛苦。
Original English
[Kristine Beese]: Yeah I would agree. And I actually when I saw the data, I was curious when people said they weren't cutting back on savings, was it because they they weren't saving to begin with. So a little bit deeper because when we when we work with people, we force the savings conversation issue. But sometimes it's not something that's happening right now. So that's something I'm worried about. I don't think enough Canadians understand how debt works and understand, you know, the difference between getting your money working for you versus getting your money working for someone else. Getting your money working for you means that the money that's invested is making money on itself. And so we actually break down what you contributed and what what money came that you did not contribute came from that return on investment. And if you start early enough, the return on investment is more than half what you contributed, which is how you can afford a life, a retirement. And so when you're when your money is working for someone else, you're doing that to the benefit of someone else. You're paying this instead of it going up, you're paying this going down. And so one of the things that really bothers me when the government talks about, oh, we've made mortgages longer, so housing is more affordable. I'm like, that's actually not more affordable. It's a misnomer. You're you're now asking people to pay much more in interest. And it's you're asking people to work much harder for banks.
[主持人]: 好的。
Original English
[Host]: Okay.
[Erin Kelly]: 而且很多人,我想说,他们并不理解。你说得很对。我们做了一项关于个人破产的研究。当你破产时,财务顾问和各种专业人士都会介入来帮你偿还债务,但他们并不是为你(破产者)工作的,他们是为你欠钱的债权人工作的。但很多人只是盲目信任,没有寻求属于自己的财务建议,因为他们以为那些人在帮他们。
我想有一件事表现得非常明确——虽然我们没做图表——那就是每个人,无论你是单身还是一个家庭,都觉得我们的税收系统太复杂了。它实际上对任何人都没起到好的作用。如果你必须雇佣专业人士才能给政府交税,因为你觉得否则就拿不到所有可能拿到的微小豁免;或者天哪,如果你处于破产状态,你无法负担请任何人帮你,但你又无法靠自己渡过难关,所以你基本上任由那些拥有专业人士的债权人宰割。我们看到过一些人没日没夜地干活来偿还所有债务,但实际上如果他们直接宣布破产并走开,结果反而会更好。
Original English
[Erin Kelly]: And a lot of people I'd say don't understand. You're very right. They don't understand that a lot of these. So we did a study on people going bankrupt, which and when you go bankrupt, the financial advisor, all sorts of professionals come in, right, to help you pay back these debts, but they're not working for you, the bankrupt person. Right. They're working for the people that you owe. But a lot of people just trust this and don't get their own financial advice, or because they think those people are helping them. And so it's I think one of one of the things that came out loud and clear, which we didn't make a graph for, is that everybody, whether you're single, you're a household. Everybody feels our tax system is too complicated. It's actually not working well for anyone. Okay. And, you know, if you have to hire a professional just to pay the government your taxes because you feel otherwise, you're not getting all the little exceptions you could have gotten or, you know, if, heaven forbid, you're in a bankruptcy situation. You can't afford to help anyone, but you can't get through it on your own. So you're kind of at the mercy of the others who do have professionals. So because we've seen people who are slaving away to pay off the debts of everything they own, whereas it would have actually just been better if they kind of declared and walked away in a way, like.
[主持人]: 非常有趣。
Original English
[Host]: Very interesting.
[Kristine Beese]: 我真心希望 “消费者提议”(Consumer proposals)和“破产”能少一些污名化。因为我们经常给企业这种待遇。我认为我们会陷入麻烦,而且麻烦会不断叠加,直到失控螺旋。我希望人们能接受重启。我以前并不知道你必须请自己的专业人士。我对这个领域了解得不如我想象中多,但我真的希望我们对此不再有同样的羞耻感,让更多人能利用这些机制。
Original English
[Kristine Beese]: I really wish consumer proposals and bankruptcy had less stigma because I think, you know, we give it to businesses all the time. And, and I think that getting we can get into trouble and it's it's compounding and it can just spiral out of control. And I wish people would take the reset and just, you know, I didn't realize that you had to get your own professionals. I don't know as much about the spaces I would like to, but it I really wish we didn't have the same stigma about it and more people took advantage.
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: 关于钱,有很多羞耻和责备。好像如果你因为某种原因无法处理好个人财务,你作为一个“人”就是失败的。但如果你想一想,很多加拿大人并没有真正接触过适当的财务教育。他们只能看到父母或家庭对金钱的反应,从而建立起自己的金钱观。但是,对于很多加拿大人来说,关于“当你拿到第一笔零用钱”或“当你开始工作”时的那种深入对话,其实并没有发生。
Original English
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: There's a lot of shame and blame about money, like if you cannot manage your own finances personally for some reason, that just becomes that you are a failure as a human being. But if you think about it, like a lot of Canadians aren't really exposed to actual proper financial education, they kind of see how their parents or their family react to money, so they kind of build up their own money stories. But, you know, having a conversation about, you know, maybe when you get your first allowance or when you start working and all of those things doesn't happen with a lot of Canadians.
专家建议:以“工时”衡量价值
[主持人]: 好的。话虽如此,在我们剩下的最后一分钟里,我一定要确保能得到专家们的建议。Christina,从你开始。尽管住房成本和食物成本很高,人们仍然想存钱。我们可以给他们什么建议?
Original English
[Host]: All right. With that being said, in our last minute that we have, I do want to make sure that we get some advice from the experts here. So, Christina, I'll start with you. Despite high housing costs and food costs, people still might want to save and can perhaps see the concern there. Yes. What advice can we offer them?
[Kristine Beese]: 要知道,你没法做完所有事。你真的做不到。账算不过来。这完全取决于取舍(Trade-offs)。真正关注对你来说重要的事情,让那些噪音消失。
我们喜欢做的一件事是:将你的成本换算成“小时”,即你需要工作多少小时才能支付某样东西。我觉得,如果一杯咖啡要花掉我一个小时的工作时间,决定它值不值得就容易多了。或者自动售货机里的一个东西要花掉我一小时,它值得吗?如果我们停止随意挥霍金钱,而是有意识地消费,我们会发现人们的财务结果会好得多,而且取舍会变得更易于管理,他们也能获得那些带来快乐的东西。但这是一个不同的视角。所以,你现在做得很好了,只是你不得不做出取舍,弄清楚什么对你重要。有些人很乐意和别人合住,这样他们就不需要存那么多钱了。
Original English
[Kristine Beese]: Know that. That you're not able to do it all. You aren't. The math doesn't math. It doesn't work. It's about trade offs. Really. Focus on what's important to you and let the noise fall away. And so one thing I like we like to do is base your costs in hours for how many hours you work to pay for something. So I think it's a lot easier to decide if a coffee costs me one hour of my time. Is that worth it for me? Or if an item at a, you know, out of a vending machine is an hour of my time, is that worth it to me? And and if we stop, sort of, you know, frittering our money away and we spend it intentionally, we find that people have much better outcomes and they're able to get and the trade offs feel more manageable, and they're able to get to the things that bring them joy. But it's a different way of looking at it. So you're doing great where you are, it's going you're going to have to make trade offs, figure out what's important to you. Some people are happy to live with another person and they don't need to save as much money then.
[主持人]: 没错。最后一个建议。
Original English
[Host]: Exactly. You got the last one.
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: 我想补充一点。你的生活方式是为你服务的,对吧?不要把自己和别人比较,那是自我的毁灭。而且在更大的层面上,去支持那些能帮到你的政策。无论是对你有效的住房政策,还是像你喜欢的合作住房(Co-op housing)概念——它可以比市场价低 30%,而且你仍然拥有资产——那就去支持这些政策。
Original English
[Renee Sylvestre-Williams]: I would add on to that. You know your lifestyle works for you, right? Don't compare yourself to others. That is just the death of ego, but also on a bigger scale, you know, support policies that will help you, right? You know, is it, you know, again, is it a housing policy that works for you? Do you love the idea of co-op housing, which can be 30% under market and you still own something, then support those policies.
[主持人]: 好的。我还可以……
Original English
[Host]: All right. And can I.
[Erin Kelly]: 补充一下政策方面吗?我确实认为我们需要政府层面的政策改革,简化税收系统。如果能鼓励人们储蓄并投资于加拿大的企业,我们就有机会实现政府试图克服的许多目标。但要做到这一点,我们真的需要彻底改革税收系统。
Original English
[Erin Kelly]: Add to the policies? I do think we do need a government level policy change here, simplifying the tax system. And we can we have an opportunity if we can encourage people saving and investing in in Canadian business, in a way we can actually achieve a lot of things that the government is trying to overcome. But we really to do that need to overhaul the tax system.
[主持人]: 好的,我们只能谈到这里了。Renee,Christina,非常感谢你们。Erin,这只是我们的开始。你以后还会带着更多数据回来参加未来的访谈。我们期待那一刻。
Original English
[Host]: All right. We are going to have to leave it there. Renee. Christina, I really appreciate it. Thank you so much. And Aaron, this is just the just the beginning for us. You are going to be back with some more data sets for some future interviews. So we look forward to that.