加州州长竞选人 Steve Hilton:打破一党专政,让加州再次“负担得起” All-In Podcast 2026-04-29

欢迎共和党挑战者 Steve Hilton

Jason: 好了,各位。欢迎回到《All-In 访谈秀》。今天我们非常荣幸邀请到了一位加州州长候选人,他在很多方面都非常独特。首先,他是共和党人;其次,他是个英国人。欢迎来到节目,Steve Hilton。你决定从两个维度增加挑战难度,但你的民调表现非常出色。民调显示你在五六个候选人中处于领先地位。

Original English

Jason: All right, everybody. Welcome back to the All-In Interview Show. We're very lucky today to have a candidate for the governor of California who is extremely unique in a number of ways. First of all, he's a Republican. And second, he's a Brit. Welcome to the program, Steve Hilton. You've decided to increase the degree of difficulty in two ways, but you're polling fantastic. You've got five or six people in the polls. So, he's leading the field.

Jason: 你目前处于领先位置。显然,当民主党人再“捅”掉几个人,让他们退出竞选,然后在他们的密室里选出最终赢家时(无论什么时候,当 Nancy Pelosi 选定谁来参选时),竞争范围会缩小。但是,Steve,也许你可以先介绍一下自己,告诉我们你为什么要参选。

Original English

Jason: You're leading the field. Obviously, it's going to get narrowed a bit when the Democrats shiv a couple more people and get them out of the race and then pick their eventual winner in their cobble — whenever that happens when Nancy Pelosi picks who's running. But, Steve, maybe you could start by — sorry guys, I got jokes. But, Steve, maybe you could introduce yourself a bit and tell us why you're running.

Steve Hilton: 喔,等等。在那段精彩的开场白之后,我只能说,你刚才试图用寥寥数语就断送我的机会。多谢了,Jason,真的非常感谢。

Original English

Steve Hilton: Well, hang on. Can I just say just after that great intro where you just tried to kill my chances in just a couple of words. Thanks a lot, Jason. Really appreciate it.

从匈牙利难民到英国首相顾问

Chamath: 让我来起个头吧。我从 2012 或 2013 年就认识 Steve 了,当时他和他的妻子 Rachel Whetstone 搬到了硅谷。Rachel 最初在 Facebook 工作,后来 Jason,她和你一起在 Uber 工作,事业非常成功。Steve 也是如此。你虽然用了幽默的方式表达,但归根结底,这是一片令人难以置信的移民之地,Steve 有一个非常动人的故事。所以在进入问题之前,Steve,我知道你的背景,但我认为有必要回顾一下你的父母、你的母亲,以及你的成长环境。请为我们设定一个场景:你是如何从那样一个起点走出来的,以及你后来为什么来到美国。

Original English

Chamath: Let me actually tee this up. I've known Steve since 2012 2013 when he and his wife Rachel Wetstone moved to Silicon Valley. Rachel worked at Facebook initially and then she worked with you Jason at Uber and then has had a great run and then Steve similarly. And you said it in a funny way, but ultimately this is an incredible land of immigrants and Steve has a really compelling story. So before we jump into the questions, I know your background, Steve, but I do think it's important go back to your parents, your mom, how you grew up, and just set the stage for how you made it out from the way you started because I think that's important and then how you got to the United States and why.

Steve Hilton: 谢谢。谢谢你。我很感激。你说的对,我们认识很久了。来到这里是我的荣幸。顺便说一下,很高兴参加一个不需要穿西装打领带的节目。你知道,竞选州长最让我享受的一点是大部分过程,但盛装打扮绝对不是我的最爱。所以能和你们在一起太棒了。

关于我的背景,我思考得越多,就越觉得它对我如何看待事物以及我想实现什么目标非常重要。我的父母是匈牙利人,他们是共产主义的难民。我在英国南海岸一个叫布莱顿的小镇长大,我们就是一个普通的工薪阶层、移民背景、充满抱负的家庭故事。我的父母在我很小的时候就分开了。我的继父也是匈牙利人,他有一个传奇的故事。他也是一名难民,字面意义上的跑过了边界。他生长在匈牙利西边的一个小村庄。1956 年苏联入侵时,他才 14 岁——比我现在最小的儿子还小一岁。他在广播里听到“俄国人来了”,于是他和他的哥哥以及一些学校的朋友决定“我们要自由”,然后他们就逃跑了。他们跑向边界,冲过铁丝网和地雷阵,还遭到了守卫的射击。其中一半人被杀,他最终到了奥地利的难民营,然后去了英国。

这一切让我对自由机会有了发自内心的珍惜。我在英国长大,学习非常刻苦,最后考入了牛津大学。但我的第一份工作是一家建筑公司的项目经理。我当时只想挣钱,想“走出去”。我觉得你用的那个词非常准确。牛津毕业后,我在英国保守党工作了一段时间,然后去了一家大型广告机构,在全球各地出差,创办了自己的公司。后来,当我多年前认识的朋友 David Cameron(大卫·卡梅伦)参选议员并竞选保守党领袖时,我回到了政坛帮他竞选。我们赢了那场选举,并在 2010 年帮助保守党在大选中获胜,他成为了首相。我进入了唐宁街 10 号,担任首相的高级顾问,主要负责落实我们的改革方案。2012 年,我们搬到了这里,因为 Rachel 当时在 Google 担任全球传播和公共政策负责人,那时候我们的第二个孩子刚出生,出差和时差的负担太重了。所以我们搬到了这里。

Original English

Steve Hilton: Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate that. And you're right. We've known each other a long time now. And it's a great joy to be here. By the way, just want to say it's a great joy to be on a show where I don't have to wear the the suit and shirt. And you know, that's one of the things about running for governor that um I'm I'm loving most of it, but dressing up is not the favorite part for me. So, it's great to be with you. My parents are Hungarian. They were refugees from communism and I grew up in in England in a town called Brighton on the south coast and you know we just had a regular working-class um immigrant aspirational family story I guess. My stepfather's also a Hungarian. In 1956 when you had the Soviet invasion, he tells this amazing story. They heard on the radio, "The Russians are coming." And he and his brother and some friends from his school, he was 14 years old... and they just ran. They literally ran to the border, barbed wire fences, minefields got shot at by the guards. All that half of them were killed and he ended up in a refugee camp in Austria and from then to England. So all of that I guess just gives you that sense of real appreciation for actual for freedom for freedom and opportunity. After Oxford, I went back into politics when my friend David Cameron won that election and then worked with him to get the Conservatives elected when he became prime minister in 2010. Uh joined him in 10 Downing Street. I was senior adviser to the prime minister. And then in 2012, that's when we met. We moved here because Rachel was at Google.

Jason: 特别值得注意的是,你已经入籍了。你现在是美国公民。所以你有双重国籍。这样大家就不会被你的口音搞糊涂了。你在竞选州长,而且你是公民。

Original English

Jason: Well, you're also notably you became naturalized. You're a citizen of the United States now. So you have dual citizenship. less people are confused by the accent. You're running for governor and you're a citizen of—

政治进化:撒切尔夫人的遗产与加州的现状

Chamath: 让我们谈谈你的政治立场。作为一个在反抗共产主义的匈牙利移民家庭长大的孩子,你对“国家角色”与“家庭或个人角色”的关系一定有特定的看法。后来在英国长大,我相信你的态度要么得到了加强,要么发生了改变。请告诉我们 Steve Hilton 的政治进化史。他过去相信什么,现在相信什么,是什么塑造了这些信念?

Original English

Chamath: Let's talk about your political setup. So, being a child of Hungarian immigrants raising communism, you're going to hear a certain version of what the role of the state is versus what the role of the family or the individual is. Then, growing up in the UK, I'm sure your attitudes either get cemented or change. Give us the setup. What is the political evolution of Steve Hilton? what did he believe and then what does he believe now and what has shaped these beliefs.

Steve Hilton: 这可以追溯到我最早开始思考这些问题的时候,正值 Margaret Thatcher(撒切尔夫人)上台。英国的 70 年代是一场灾难,那个十年经济完全停滞,僵化的工会主宰了一切。1979 年发生了著名的“不满的冬日”,大规模罢工导致死者无人埋葬,垃圾堆积如山,整个社会彻底崩溃。撒切尔夫人进来就是为了解决这些问题,我非常认同她的做法,以及她对共产主义的鲜明立场。所以,我完全被她鼓舞了,尤其是她对商业企业辛勤工作的关注。我记得我的继父,顺便说一下,他们一点政治倾向都没有,家里从不讨论政治。但他曾说过一句话,至今印在我的脑海里。当时在英国,共和党对应的保守党和民主党对应的工党。他说:“撒切尔夫人是为劳动者服务的,而工党是为懒汉服务的。”这个关于工作和奋斗(hustle)重要性的理念一直伴随着我。

Original English

Steve Hilton: It's really I think it goes back to just around the when I first really started thinking about it all it was just as Margaret Thatcher was coming to power and you'd had the 70s in England were a disaster and a decade that was just the the economy was completely stagnant and slurotic unions ran everything. Um there was this period called the winter of discontent in 1979 when you had massive strikes um famously you know the dead went unburied and trash was piled up in the street just real collapse of everything and that's what thatcher came in to fix. I remember my stepfather, they weren't at all political, but he had this thing that stuck in my mind when he talked about Mrs. Thatcher's for the workers and labor are for the layabouts and I just this phrase stuck in my mind about the importance of work and hustle and I think about that all the time.

Chamath: 你认为现在的加州处于什么位置?

Original English

Chamath: Where do you think California is if you contrast?

Steve Hilton: 这正是我要说的重点。我们现在的处境与英国 70 年代惊人地相似。你会看到加州今天也有工会对政策制定的巨大支配、僵化的经济、极高的税收。在英国最糟糕的时候,加上财富税,最高税率甚至达到了 98%。这种掠夺性的征税在现在非常相似。

有趣的是,Michael Moritz 曾发给我一份关于今日英国的报告,报告中提到的过度监管、建造任何东西的艰难,简直和今天的加州如出一辙。顺便说一下,Jason,有一点我要明确:我现在是一名自豪的美国人,而且我已经放弃了我的英国国籍。我这么做是因为我想借用这个节目的名字,表明我是“All In”(全身心投入)。

Original English

Steve Hilton: Well, this is the the point I was just about to get to is we really are there. There are so many things I see in California today that are exactly like the UK in the 70s. You've got the massive dominance of the unions in policym. You've got a slurotic economy. You've got massively high taxation. I mean it was higher then... at one point I think the top rate when you add in the wealth taxes in the UK was literally 98%. By the way, Jason, just to be clear, I am a proud American now, but I'm not — I actually renounced my UK citizenship. I did that because I just wanted to be clear that I'm just — to borrow the title of the show, you be all in. All in. Literally.

“十万美元免税”:激进的减税与效率革命

Jason: 让我们谈谈一些具体的政策。你有一些非常独特、甚至可以说相当平民主义的政策主张。关于税收,你希望加州年收入低于 10 万美元 的人免交州税,而对于 10 万美元以上的所有人,统一征收 7.5% 的单一税。这怎么可能实现?你是如何研究出这个方案的?

Original English

Jason: And you have some to get into some maybe some policy. Taxes, I think, is the most unique and dare I say pretty populist. You want to have no state tax in California for people with under $100,000 in income and then a flat tax for everybody over 100K of but 7.5%. How is that possible? And is that something you've studied? And where did this come from?

Steve Hilton: 那个税收计划是我竞选活动启动第一天发布的。我认为它是亲劳动者亲增长的。我们需要这两者,因为如果你看看加州今天的经济数据,虽然表面上拥有世界第四大经济体,这确实值得自豪,我也希望加州保持成功和增长。但在这个数据之下,加州的失业率贫困率却是全美最高的。

一份报告显示,超过三分之一的加州人无法负担基本需求。因此,我税收计划的起点是:我们能做些什么来迅速帮助那些苦苦挣扎的人?工薪阶层并没有得到福利系统的特别照顾,他们拼命工作,却被各种生活成本压得喘不过气。加州的油价是全美最高的,电费(除了夏威夷)是全美最高的,住房成本和保险也是最高的。那么,对于年收入 7 万、8 万、9 万美元的人,他们要缴纳 9.3% 的州个人所得税,这个税率甚至高于美国大多数州的最高档税率。再加上全美最高的销售税、财产税和汽油税,这简直是荒谬。

Original English

Steve Hilton: The tax plan that um that I put out there, that was the first day of my campaign. I think of it as proworker and progrowth. But that fourth biggest economy data point underneath that you've got this with the state with the highest unemployment rate in the country and the highest poverty rate in the country tied with Louisiana. They found that over a third of Californians cannot afford to meet basic needs. So the starting point for my tax plan is what can we do quickly to help people who are really struggling. You've got people earning 70 grand, 80 grand, 90 grand in California. They are paying 9.3% state income tax. That rate is higher than the top rate in most states in America.

Jason: 如此大幅度的减税意味着你必须大幅削减开支。

Original English

Jason: So cutting taxes this significantly means you have to then also cut spending.

Steve Hilton: 是的。我不仅要实行首个 10 万美元免税,还要推行 7.5% 的单一税。加州的营商环境在过去 10 年里一直被评为全美倒数第一,税收是主要驱动因素。我们还有那种疯狂的“亿万富翁税”提案,正在把财富创造者和企业投资赶出加州。

至于开支,这个税收计划的总成本大约是财政收入减少 18.5%,也就是大约 600 亿美元。这甚至还没有回到疫情前的预算水平。在过去的 10 年里,加州的预算几乎翻了一番;在过去的 5 年里,它增长了约 75%。将预算带回到疫情前的水平,就足以覆盖减税的成本。

Original English

Steve Hilton: Yes. Apart from anything else, the complexity is ridiculous of our tax system. These endless different rates is ridiculously complicated. Basically the the the cost of that in total is about an 18.5% reduction in revenue, which takes us back — it takes us down about 60 billion, which is not even going back to what the budget was just before the pandemic. If you look at the budget of the state of California, it's nearly doubled in the last 10 years. In the last 5 years it's gone up something like 75%. And so this is just bringing the budget back just to where it was roughly before the pandemic.

Jason: 我来总结一下。根据你的计划,如果加州居民年收入在 0 到 10 万美元之间,免征州所得税;如果年收入超过 10 万美元,则统一征收 7.5%。这会影响多少加州人?

Original English

Jason: Let me just summarize. So if you make between 0 and $100,000 a year as a California resident under your plan, no tax — no state income tax. If you make $100,000 and a dollar and above, you pay 7.5% flat tax. Okay. How many Californians does that impact?

Steve Hilton: 大约有 700 万个家庭将从“10 万美元以下”的免税政策中受益,这大约占加州家庭总数的三分之一以上。

Original English

Steve Hilton: It's about 7 million households would benefit from from the under 100,000. I think that's about um probably just over a third, something like that.

Cal DOGE:打击 800 亿美元的欺诈与浪费

Jason: 那么问题来了。如果直接从运营预算中减去这些钱,公共项目将会受损。你的观点是,我们只需要回到 2020 年的预算。以前花 1 美元,现在花 2 美元,但现状并没有改变,所以回到 1.5 美元也没问题。

Original English

Jason: Now the push back would be if we then take it dollar for dollar from the operating budget, programs will suffer. Well, not really because we're going to go back to 2019 2020 budgets and the difference was we spent a dollar in 2020, we now spend $2 and nothing has changed. So, yeah, go from $2 back to $150 and everything should be fine is your point.

Steve Hilton: 是的,我甚至想走得更远。疫情期间的预算扩张已经成了固定的基准,这是不可持续的。如果不加减税,我们也会破产,正如你们现在看到的赤字,哪怕在非衰退时期,他们也在动用储备基金。

更重要的是,我们要看看钱到底去哪了。我成立了一个组织,字面意思就叫 Cal DOGE(加州政府效率部)。我知道这个名字有争议,但“高效政府”是每个人都会支持的概念。我们通过研究已公开的开支数据,对系统中的欺诈、浪费和滥用进行了评估。我们已经发布了四份欺诈报告。

举几个例子:第二份报告显示,过去 10 年里,“气候变化缓解基金”中本应投入 10 亿美元用于为低收入公寓安装太阳能电池板。我们利用 AI 合作伙伴追踪了这笔资金,发现只有 7200 万美元真正花在了太阳能板上,剩下的 9.28 亿美元全流向了那些与民主党关联的非营利组织,用于选民登记、环境正义运动等。

另一个例子是大麻税。用于预防药物滥用的 3.5 亿美元流向了一个由 500 多家非营利组织组成的网络,用于激进活动。还有针对流浪汉问题的 Project Homekey,其中 38 亿美元大部分落入了开发商的口袋。我们估计过去五年加州的无效、欺诈和浪费总额高达 4250 亿美元,平均每年约 800 亿美元,约占预算的 20%

Original English

Steve Hilton: Yes. And so we got to get back to even even without tax cuts, I would argue you've got to get back to a more reasonable growth in spending because we go bankrupt. I literally called it Cal DOGE — California Department of Government Efficiency. I know that's a controversial brand, but efficient government is something I think everyone would support. We've now published four separate fraud reports. Here's some specific examples. The second fraud report — $1 billion over the last 10 years... 100 million a year was allocated to be spent on climate change mitigation (solar panels for low-income apartments). Of that 1 billion total, the actual amount spent on the purported benefit was 72 million. 928 million actually went to nonprofits doing all all the usual Democrat associated stuff, voter registration, environmental justice campaigns. What percentage of it? averaged over the years it's about 80 billion a year. So it's around, you know, 20% or so.

住房危机:工会、诉讼与“气候教条”

Chamath: 让我们谈谈普通人感触最深的生活成本——住房。为什么加州的租金和房价这么高?

Original English

Chamath: Let me ask about the broader cost of living for a second. Probably the most impactful cost to people's lived experience is the cost of housing. Double click into that for a second. For the 40 million residents of California, what is going on? Why are rents so high? Why are homes so expensive? And what can actually be done to make the cost of living and rent cheaper?

Steve Hilton: 这个问题集中体现了为什么民主党修不好加州。三个结构性因素:工会势力滥诉气候教条

首先,我们没有建造足够的房屋。除了供需问题,建筑法规也极其繁重。例如由于“气候教条”,在建造公寓时必须安装规模巨大的 EV 充电桩。这导致停车场结构需要加固地板,车位变得更宽,从而减少了每个建筑的车位数,大幅拉高成本。还有强制安装太阳能板、极其严苛的隔热要求。所有这些初衷良好的事情被推向极端,让人们买不起房。

最严重的是 CEQA(加州环境质量法)。私人有权根据该法律提起诉讼。70% 的 CEQA 诉讼都是为了阻挠住房建设,而且大部分是由工会发起的。工会将其作为谈判“项目劳工协议”(PLA)的杠杆,要求必须雇佣工会工人(成本高出 2-3 倍),即使当地没有足够的工会工人,也得从外州空运过来,这简直荒谬。

我在研究政策时曾试图推动一项投票提案,将“建设规费”(Impact Fees)上限定为建设成本的 3%,并取消 CEQA 下的私人诉讼权。我曾去萨克拉门托找一位被认为对住房政策友好的民主党议员。他私下对我说:“这会是变革性的。”但我问他是否支持时,他指着窗外的州议会大厦说:“我不能公开支持,工会统治着这里。”

Original English

Steve Hilton: Three structural forces show why a Democrat can't fix it: union power, litigation and climate dogma. It just costs more to build anything in California. The same exact house cost two or three times more to build in California than in neighboring states. Building codes driven by climate dogma — you have to install EV charging and the scale of what's required just makes it more expensive. 70% of CEQA lawsuits are used to block housing. Most of those lawsuits are filed by unions — they're used as leverage to negotiate project labor agreements (union only). I had a meeting with a legislator: "Oh, I couldn't support you publicly." Why not? "Well, the unions would hate it. The unions run this place."

Sacks: 关键就在这。德州(我目前居住的地方)没有 CEQA。在加州,每个门的规费是 3 万美元,德州不到 1000 美元。德州人均产出的新房是加州的三倍。加州的使命是保护环境,但德州的空气、水和土地变差了吗?显然没有。加州政府为什么不直面这个问题?它拥有全美最高的租金、最高的贫困率,以及最慢的住房增长。

Original English

Sacks: This is the key. There's no equivalent to CEQA in Texas where I now reside. It's 30,000 per door in fees to the government in California. It's under a thousand in Texas. California still has the worst air quality in the country largely because of the addiction to cars and traffic. So I'm just trying to understand why hasn't the California government confronted this?

能源乱象:为什么加州油价全美最高?

Chamath: 为什么加州的汽油价格每加仑要 7-8 美元,而其他地方只要 3 美元?

Original English

Chamath: Why is gas in California 7-8 gallon and why is it $3 everywhere else?

Steve Hilton: 尽管加州拥有丰富的石油储备,我们的油价却比连石油都没有的夏威夷还贵。根本原因还是挂着“气候”羊头卖狗肉。我们现在近 80% 的石油依赖进口,主要来源国竟然是伊拉克

加州曾经有强大的能源工业,但现在由于州政府机构 CalGEM 拒绝签发许可证,生产被切断。因为加州没有通往外州的输油管道,我们必须用油轮从半个地球外运。而且因为加州的炼油厂是为加州原油(重质原油)设计的,正好伊拉克的原油匹配,南美洲的也匹配。

最讽刺的是:为了保护气候,我们现在竟然在亚马逊雨林扩大石油钻探,为加州炼油厂提供石油,然后用排放最严重的油轮横跨大洋运过来。加州空气资源委员会(CARB)要求所有企业核算整个供应链的碳排放,唯独石油进口的碳排放只从进入加州海岸 12 英里处开始计算。这简直是疯了。作为州长,我可以一夜之间通过任命亲能源的官员来扭转这一局面,因为规则是只要我们还在用油,就应该优先用自己的油。

Original English

Steve Hilton: We are now importing nearly 80% of the oil that we use. Our number one provider is Iraq right now. In the name of Democrat climate policy, we are now expanding oil drilling in the Amazon rainforest in order to provide the right kind of oil for California's refineries. It's just so utterly insane and incoherent. CARB (California Air Resources Board) — miraculously the carbon emissions for the oil imports are only counted from when they're 12 miles off the coast of California. It's just so crazy.

教育改革:密西西比模式与问责制

Chamath: 加州的教育系统怎么了?为什么我们在取消 AP 课程?我们如何将薪酬与产出挂钩?

Original English

Chamath: What's happening in the California education system? Why are we stripping away things like AP? And how do we tie compensation to outcomes?

Steve Hilton: 数据非常可怕。今年加州在每个学生身上的投入超过 2.7 万美元,位居全美前列,但结果却是全美最差的。不到一半的学生英语达标,只有 35% 的学生数学达标。

核心问题是教师工会对公立学校垄断的严密控制。在疫情期间,洛杉矶教师工会提出的复课要求竟然包括加征财富税、全民医保和巴勒斯坦问题,完全变成了一个政治利益集团。长远来看,我们需要推行学校选择权(School Choice),打破垄断。

短期内,我们可以学习密西西比州。他们的学生人均投入只有加州的三分之一,但成绩在过去 10 年里突飞猛进。他们做对了三件事:第一,推行最有效的“拼读教学法”(Phonics),加州公立学校几乎不用;第二,严格考核,如果三年级结束时阅读不达标,必须留级,直到学会为止;第三,问责制,我主张给每个学校、每个老师打分,奖励优秀的,淘汰差劲的。

Original English

Steve Hilton: We spend about 27,000 per student per year in California and we get some of the worst results in the country. For math it's 35%. The driver of this is really the grip on the government school monopoly of the teacher unions. Look at what works elsewhere: Mississippi. For one-third of their spend per student than California, their results are spectacularly better. Number one: phonics. Barely used in California. Second: reading by the end of third grade. If you don't pass, you repeat the year. That single change has transformed their results. And then a grade for every school and a grade for every teacher.

治安与无家可归:停止意识形态驱动的决策

Jason: 谈谈犯罪和流浪汉问题。加州主要城市对 950 美元以下的盗窃不予追究,药店的东西都被锁起来了。

Original English

Jason: Crime and then homelessness. Major cities, they let people out for petty crimes under $950. Everything's locked up in drugstores.

Steve Hilton: 加州擅长立法——上一届会议通过了 1118 项法案,打印出来比我还高,但加州不擅长执法。左翼有一种荒谬的态度,比如最近出现的所谓“微型掠夺”(micro-looting),认为为了所谓的“社会正义”偷东西是可以接受的。

作为州长,我最能直接控制的是监狱关闭计划。加州监狱人数从 2006 年的 16.5 万降到了现在的 9.3 万,但这并没有减少预算。数以万计的危险罪犯被释放到社区或转移到原本就拥挤的地方县监狱。警察对此感到失望,因为他们抓了人,法院很快就释放了(Catch and Release)。我承诺停止并逆转监狱关闭计划,增加监狱容量,这不仅是为了惩罚,也是为了真正的康复,比如解决囚犯普遍存在的读写障碍和失读症。

关于流浪汉,2024 年最高法院在“Grants Pass 诉俄勒冈州案”中已经明确,即使没有充足的长期安置住房,地方政府也有权清理露宿营地。加州政客不能再躲在借口后面了。我上任后会给他们一定时间清理,如果不做,我会动用州执法资源去清理。80% 的流浪汉有毒瘾或精神健康问题,我们必须回归“强制康复或坐牢”的原则,加州不能把这些钱喂给所谓的“流浪汉产业复合体”,去建每间房 90 万美元的公寓,而应该投入到大规模的现代化精神健康设施中。

Original English

Steve Hilton: California is brilliant at passing laws but not very good at enforcing them. Gavin Newsom shut down four or five state prisons. I've committed to stopping and reversing the prison closure program. Increase prison capacity in California. For homelessness — over 80% of people who are homeless have drug or alcohol problems or severe mental health problems. You got to have a 100% sober requirement for any kind of state services. Take the money that's currently going into the homeless industrial complex, these ridiculous apartment units costing $900,000 a door, and put it into modern large-scale mental health facilities.

胜选之路:团结跨族裔的工薪阶层

Jason: 最后,请描述一下你的胜选路径。加州民主党与共和党的选民比例是 2:1,共和党真的能赢吗?

Original English

Jason: Steve, as we wrap up, give us the quarterback view of your path to victory. Walk us through the sequence of events. What has to happen for you to get to Sacramento?

Steve Hilton: 加州实行“排名前二”的投票制度。虽然登记比例悬殊,但在过去 20 年里,共和党在加州的平均得票率仍超过 40%。这意味着差距并非不可逾越。

现在的民调显示,超过 55% 的加州人认为加州正走在错误的轨道上,这一比例比四年前大幅上升。选民渴望改变。在 2024 年大选中,特朗普总统在没有任何广告投入的情况下在加州拿到了 610 万张选票。而要赢得州长竞选,大约只需要 590 万张选票。这意味着票就在那里,甚至是纯共和党的票就足够了。

但我的目标是建立一个跨族裔的、工薪阶层的胜利联盟。工薪阶层受现行政策伤害最深,他们可以直接通过选票支持我的“10 万美元免税”和“小费免税”计划。我的核心竞选口号是“加州可负担”(Californable):3 美元的油价、砍掉一半的电费、第一笔 10 万美元收入完全免税、买得起的房子。这些简单的常识将让我们赢得选举。

Original English

Steve Hilton: I'm leading in all of the polls. There's a majority for change in California. In 2024, President Trump in California got 6.1 million votes. To win, you're going to need just over half of that. Call it 5.9 million. The votes are there actually, even with just Republicans. I think that you've got a real opportunity to put together the kind of multi-racial working-class coalition because they get to vote directly for no taxes — no state income taxes. My whole plan is geared toward $3 gas. I call it Californable. $3 gas. Cut your electric bills in half. Your first 100 grand tax-free. A home you can afford to buy.

Jason: Steve,代表节目组感谢你的坦率和开放。祝你一切顺利。

Original English

Jason: Steve, on behalf of all, I just want to say thank you for being so incredibly candid and open with us. We're wishing you the best of luck.

Sacks: 顺便说一句,我也因为加州的这种混乱而离开了。一个不平衡、由一党长期把持的政府注定会出问题。如果你住在加州,你已经没有什么可以失去的了。祝你好运,Steve Hilton。

Original English

Sacks: I left for a reason and part of it was the dysfunction of the state. Having an unbalanced government that's all in one party is a way to do that. If you're in California, you have nothing to lose. I wish you great luck, Steve Hilton.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

关键字: california-politics tax-policy government-efficiency housing-affordability criminal-justice