私募股权投资的代价:当资本渗透日常商业,我们失去了什么? TVO Today 2025-10-23

引言:什么是私募股权?

主持人:你知道谁拥有你家附近的兽医诊所吗?街角的牙科诊所呢?私募股权公司正在收购那些能产生稳定现金流的企业,这让一些专家对服务质量和市场竞争感到担忧。

View/Hide Original English

Do you know who owns your NEIGHBOURHOOD V8? What about the dental clinic on the corner? Private equity firms are buying up businesses that generate steady cash flow, and it has some experts worried about quality and competition.

主持人:为了了解更多,我采访了Wasserman Business Law的创始人,也是《私募股权策略:收购公司如何榨取而非创造价值以及如何应对》一书的作者Rachel Wasserman。Rachel,欢迎来到我们的演播室,你好吗?

View/Hide Original English

To find out more, I spoke with Rachel Wasserman, founder of Wasserman Business Law and the author of The Private Equity Playbook How Buyout Firms extract Rather Than Build Value and What to Do about it. Rachel, welcome to our studios. How are you?

Rachel Wasserman:我很好,谢谢邀请。

View/Hide Original English

I'm good. Thanks for having me.

主持人:好的,对于那些不是金融专家的观众,请给我们解释一下,什么是私募股权(Private Equity: 一种对非上市公司股权进行的投资,通常由专业的股权投资机构管理)?它是如何运作的?

View/Hide Original English

All right. For our viewers who are not financial experts, break it down for us. What is private equity? How does it work?

Rachel Wasserman:这是一个非常宽泛的术语,对不同的人可能意味着很多不同的事情。所以我们从最基本的开始。私募股权实际上只是投资于非公开交易的资产。所以它不是你在股票市场或债券市场看到的股票或债券。

View/Hide Original English

So a very broad term that can mean a lot of different things to a lot of different people. So let's start very basic. So private equity is really just investing money in assets that are not publicly traded. So not stocks or bonds that you would see in the stock market or the bond market.

Rachel Wasserman:这包括收购私人资产,比如房地产、私人公司和基础设施项目。私募股权本身并没有什么内在的错误,因为现在人们都在说私募股权是“大灰狼”,但这对于广义的私募股权来说并不真实。在私募股权内部,有一些参与者和行业投资于这些类型的资产,他们有自己特定的赚钱“剧本”。正是在这种剧本中,我们看到了经济中可能存在的问题,即某些方面运作得不如预期。

View/Hide Original English

So this is buying up private assets. So real estate, private companies, infrastructure projects. There's nothing inherently wrong about private equity because, you know people are saying private equity is the big bad wolf right now. But that's not true of the generic private equity. Within private equity, there are actors and industries that invest in these types of assets and have specific a specific playbook of how they make their money. And within that are the critiques of where things in the economy perhaps aren't working as great as they could be.

Rachel Wasserman:因此,在私募股权内部,存在着一个由风险投资基金(Venture Funds: 投资于初创企业或高增长潜力公司的股权基金)、收购基金(Buyout Funds: 通过收购现有公司多数股权,通常利用大量债务来完成交易,以期在未来出售获利)和房地产基金组成的行业,它们正在投资经济。这实际上只是一个隐藏的层面,超越了我们作为消费者所看到的常规经济。它涉及对现有企业的所有权,也就是收购。

View/Hide Original English

And so within private equity, there is an industry of venture funds, buyout funds, real estate funds that are investing in the economy. That is really just a layer, a hidden layer up above what we as consumers see as the regular economy. It's ownership of existing businesses, buyout.

收购模式的渗透与影响

主持人:收购是我们即将深入探讨的一个话题。它似乎频繁登上新闻头条。多年来,我们看到许多加拿大企业被这些私募股权公司收购。我们正在谈论的是哪些类型的企业呢?

View/Hide Original English

That's one that we will be delving into. It's one that seems to be hitting the headlines. We have seen over the years a number of Canadian businesses being bought up by these private equity companies. What types of businesses are we looking at?

Rachel Wasserman:几乎是所有行业。其中一个非常引人注目、我们经常在新闻中听到的,就是对专业执业机构的收购。比如牙医诊所、兽医诊所、按摩治疗师、暖通空调(HVAC)公司等等。这实际上是一个“剧本”,一个关于如何在规模经济中榨取价值的剧本。只要有利可图,这个剧本就会被频繁地部署。

View/Hide Original English

It's literally everything. And so one that is quite notable that we're hearing a lot of in the news are buyouts of professional practices. So dentists, vets, massage therapists, HVAC, like effectively it's a playbook. It's a playbook of how you can extract value in economies of scale and economies of scale. And it gets deployed as frequently as it's profitable.

Rachel Wasserman:所以我们真正看到的是,经济中的创业精神正在被整合,其目的是为他人创造价值。这导致了经济的真正变化:当我是一个业主经营者时,我拥有一个企业,我可以决定如何运营这个企业。或者它可能是一个家族企业,我的兄弟姐妹和堂表亲都在董事会,我们内部争论解决。但现在,一个新的层面正在被加入,那就是越来越多的企业,或者说很大一部分企业,现在是由那些为他人赚钱的人来运营的。

View/Hide Original English

And so really what we're seeing is this consolidation of entrepreneurship in the economy for the purposes of building value for other people. And so there's a real change in the economy, which is when I'm an owner operator, someone owns a business, I get to decide how that business is run. Or maybe it's a family business. And my brothers and sisters and cousins were on the board, and we fight it out amongst ourselves. But this is a new layer being added on, which is an increasing number of businesses, a strong or a large percentage of businesses are now being run by people who are in the business of making money for other people.

Rachel Wasserman:所以这改变了底层企业的使命。它不再关乎企业文化,不再关乎任何其他方面。

View/Hide Original English

So it it changes the mission of the underlying-- It's not about the culture. It's not about any of that.

主持人:它关乎为投资者带来利润。

View/Hide Original English

It's about returning profits to the investor.

Rachel Wasserman:我能给出的最好例子就是“榨取式增值”(Edification: 指通过降低产品或服务质量、减少投入或提高价格来增加利润,从而使消费者获得的价值减少)。我可以说这个词吗?

View/Hide Original English

So the best example I can give in certification, am I allowed to say that.

主持人:你已经说了,没关系。

View/Hide Original English

You've said it, you're good.

Rachel Wasserman:所以,“榨取式增值”这个概念就是取出价值并提高价格,而你得到的价值却减少了。这是金融行业在我们的经济中部署的一种策略,他们正在优化盈利能力。所以,如果我能出售一个产品,从中去除一些“好东西”,并以一种让我的利润保持不变的方式提高价格,那么收入的减少就会被支出的减少所抵消。

View/Hide Original English

So in edification is this concept of taking out the value and raising prices where you're just getting less value. And this is a strategy that's been deployed by the finance industry in our economy, where they're optimising profitability. So if I can sell a product and take some of the goodness out of it and raise prices in such a way that my profit stays the same, the decrease in revenue is balanced by the decrease in expenses.

Rachel Wasserman:所以这真的不是关于销售最好的产品,而是关于尽可能多地赚钱。因此,这实际上是对资本主义的一种扭曲(Perversion of Capitalism: 指资本主义原则被滥用,导致社会福利受损,投资者利益凌驾于企业和社会责任之上),我们将投资者的需求置于企业本身的需求之上。

View/Hide Original English

And so it's really not about selling the best product possible. It's about making as much money as possible. And so the it's really a perversion of capitalism where we're putting the needs of the investor ahead of the business itself.

私募股权眼中的“理想目标”与债务杠杆

主持人:好的,我想站在私募股权公司的角度来看待问题。我正在审视加拿大的商业环境。对我这样的人来说,如果我想收购一家企业,什么样的企业才具有吸引力呢?

View/Hide Original English

All right. I want to put the lens of a private equity company. I am looking and surveying the Canadian business landscape. What is a an attractive business for someone like me? If I am looking to buy?

Rachel Wasserman:好问题。可预测的现金流。归根结底,这就是一个安全的赌注。我之所以不喜欢这些收购基金——它们是私募股权行业的一个子集——是因为它们会收购整个公司。我不喜欢这种模式的原因是,它们利用巨额债务来补贴收购价格。

View/Hide Original English

Great question. Predictable cash flow. That is what it comes down to a safe bet. So the reason why I'm not a fan of these buyout funds, which is a subset of the private equity industry, these are it's called buyout because they buy out the whole company. And the reason why I don't love this is because of the massive amounts of debt used to subsidise the purchase price.

Rachel Wasserman:我举一个非常简单的例子。如果我要以1亿美元收购一家企业,我只出2000万,然后企业本身会偿还剩下的钱。现在的问题是,你知道,资产抵押贷款(Asset-Backed Loans: 以公司资产作为抵押的贷款)本身并不坏。只有当它们被滥用和系统性地使用时,我们才会遇到问题。所以,资产抵押贷款本身不坏。

View/Hide Original English

So I'm going to give a very simple example. So if I'm going to buy a business for $100 million, I'm only putting down 20. And then the business itself pays that out. Now the problem with this is that, you know, like asset backed loans are not bad. It's when they get used abusively and systemically that we have this problem. So an asset backed loan is not bad.

Rachel Wasserman:但我们必须考虑这种资产抵押贷款的机会成本(Opportunity Cost: 指为了获得某种收益而放弃的次优选择的价值)。这意味着企业支付的钱是为了补贴股东的收购价格。所以企业从这笔贷款中没有获得任何好处。它没有用于资本支出,也没有投资于企业的增长。它只是在补贴股东的价格。

View/Hide Original English

But we have to think about what is the opportunity cost of that asset backed loan. And that means the money that the business is paying to subsidise the purchase price from the shareholders. So the business gets no benefit from this loan. It's not going into capital expenditures. It's not investing in the growth of the business. It's just subsidising the price for the shareholders.

Rachel Wasserman:所以把它看作是一个纯粹的负担,没有任何好处。就像背着一块煤渣砖跑马拉松一样。

View/Hide Original English

So think of it as a pure burden with no benefit. Running a marathon with a cinderblock on your back.

监管困境与“千刀万剐”式收购

主持人:我不得不设想,由于我们看到的这些收购,监管机构的警钟应该已经敲响了。比如说,竞争局(Competition Bureau: 负责执行加拿大竞争法的独立执法机构)是否已经介入?他们正在调查此事吗?

View/Hide Original English

I have to imagine there are regulatory alarm bells ringing off because of all of these sales that we are seeing has, say, the Competition Bureau gotten involved. Are they looking into this?

Rachel Wasserman:他们正在调查,但我们现有的法律并不适用于当前市场发生的情况。你知道,几周前我在竞争峰会上发言。他们知道正在发生什么,但私募股权长期以来一直保持“私密”,不幸的是,我们的政策制定者直到现在才开始弄清楚正在发生什么。

View/Hide Original English

They are looking into this, but our laws are not appropriate for what's going on in the market right now. Our you know, I spoke at the competition summit a few weeks ago. They are aware of what's going on, but private equity has been private for so long that unfortunately, our policymakers are only starting to figure out what is going on as we speak.

Rachel Wasserman:举例来说,我们有一个超过某个美元门槛的明确界限测试(Bright Line Test: 一种清晰、客观的法律或监管标准,用于确定某种行为是否合法或允许),我认为是9300万或9600万美元。但我们没有追踪**“千刀万剐”式收购**(Death by a Thousand Cuts: 指通过一系列小规模、分散的交易,逐渐实现对市场或行业的控制,而非一次性大规模收购)。所以我们看不到有人一年内收购了20家牙科诊所,因为如果它们都低于9300万或9600万美元的门槛,那么监管干预就很少,甚至没有。

View/Hide Original English

And so, for example, we have a bright line test over a certain dollar threshold. I think it's 93 or 96 million, $96 million, but we don't track death by a thousand cuts. So we don't see that someone has bought 20 dental practices in one year, because if they all fall below that 93 or $96 million threshold, there's very little, if any, regulatory intervention.

Rachel Wasserman:因此,我们需要在应对实际情况方面更加进步,而不是仅仅设定明确的界限并等待它们被触发,因为当它们发展成庞然大物时,就为时已晚了。

View/Hide Original English

And so we need to be more progressive in terms of what's actually going on, as opposed to just setting bright lines and waiting for them to be triggered, because by the time they grow into these beasts, it's too late.

私募股权的合法角色与深远社会影响

主持人:现在,有些人可能会争辩说,私募股权是必需的。它在我们的经济中扮演着合法的角色,能够挽救企业投资。它真的有这样的作用吗?

View/Hide Original English

Now, some may argue and say that private equity is needed. There is a legitimate role for it in our economy. Saves businesses investments. Is there a role for it?

Rachel Wasserman:绝对有它的作用。为了发展我们的经济,我们需要投资。这是我们谈论得不够多的一点:投资于企业,让它们在研发、提高工资和培训方面投入资金。增长需要时间、风险和投资,如果没有一点痛苦,我们就无法发展加拿大经济。

View/Hide Original English

Absolutely. There's a role for it. In order to grow our economy, we need to invest. And that's something we don't talk about enough investing into businesses where they are spending money in research and development, in increasing wages, in training. Growth takes time, risk and investment, and we're not going to be able to grow the Canadian economy without a little bit of pain.

Rachel Wasserman:你知道,不去健身房锻炼就无法增肌。这很公平。我认为我们已经习惯了持续的回报,却没有经历增长期,没有经历为了增长而付出的亏损期。而这正是我们扭转经济局面所需要的。

View/Hide Original English

You know, you can't go to the gym and build muscle without some work. Fair enough. And I think that we have been accustomed to just consistent returns without that growth period, without that loss period for the growth to kick in. And that's really what we need to turn this economy around.

Rachel Wasserman:所以作为加拿大人,我们有一个非常有趣的视角,因为我们不仅允许外国人掠夺我们的经济,我们自己也在对他人做同样的事情。

View/Hide Original English

So we have a very interesting perspective as Canadians because not only are we allowing foreigners to plunder our economy, we are doing the same thing to others.

主持人:我们只剩下大约30秒的时间了,请你快速解释一下,为什么加拿大人应该关心正在发生的一切?

View/Hide Original English

Very quickly in about 30 seconds we have left, why should Canadians care that this is happening?

Rachel Wasserman:每个人都需要关心正在发生的一切。这不仅关乎我们经济的未来,也关乎我们的政治格局和社会图景。这是资本在幕后进行的整合。这关乎向上流动的未来。这关乎平等的未来。如果我们不关心并进行干预,我们将创造一个“拥有游艇者”和“一无所有者”的社会。

View/Hide Original English

Everyone needs to care that this is happening. This is the future of not just our economy, our political landscape, our social landscape. This is the consolidation of capital happening behind the scenes. This is the future of upward mobility. This is the future of equality. And if we don't care and intervene, we will create a society of have yachts and have nots.

主持人:Rachel,我们就谈到这里。非常感谢你。这确实提供了一些值得深思的观点。

View/Hide Original English

Rachel, we're going to leave it there. Thank you so much. Some food for thought for sure.

Rachel Wasserman:谢谢邀请。

View/Hide Original English

Thanks for having me.