城市“第三空间”的消亡与重塑:从多伦多老牌酒吧Sneaky Dee's的重建危机说起
Jeyan: 从外面看,它可能并不起眼,但这里却是多伦多的一处标志性机构。Sneaky Dee's 自1990年起就坐落在 College 和 Bathurst 街的交汇处,供应着大盘的墨西哥玉米片,举办现场音乐演出,并为几代多伦多人提供了一个聚会休闲的场所。以下是总经理 George Montrose 的一段话。
Original English
Jeyan: It may not look like much from the outside, but this is a Toronto institution. Sneaky Dee's has been at the corner of Collagen Bathurst since 1990, serving giant plates of nachos, hosting live music and giving generations of Torontonians a place to hang out. Here's general manager George Montrose.
George Montrose: 曾经有人告诉我,如果你翻开《孤独星球》(Lonely Planet)多伦多这一章,如果你想见识真正的多伦多,你就必须去 Sneaky Dee's,因为它是这座城市的一个缩影和横截面。
Original English
George Montrose: Somebody told me that if you picked up the Lonely Planet under Toronto, if you want to see the real Toronto, you got to go to sneaky because it's such a cross-section of the city.
Jeyan: 但现在,它的未来却悬而未决。而且这个原因,对于任何见证了这座城市多年来变迁的人来说,听起来都会非常熟悉——一个拟议中的公寓开发项目。但是,社区成员和 Sneaky Dee's 的粉丝们并不愿意放弃,他们准备为之抗争。我们将探讨为什么会有这么多人齐聚一堂,共同保护一家低档酒吧(dive bar),以及谁有权力去拯救它。但首先,Sneaky Dee's 与咖啡店、书店和公园有什么共同之处?实际上,它们都是“第三空间”(third places)的典型例子,意思就是它们既不是家,也不是工作场所。我们将深入探讨为什么“第三空间”对于建立社区如此重要,以及当它们消失时我们会失去什么。欢迎收看《The Rundown》。早在上世纪80年代,社会学家 Ray Oldenburg 创造了“第三空间”这个词。它是除了家和工作场所之外,我们在一种充满友爱和欢乐的氛围中聚集的地方,我们在这里享受彼此的陪伴。专家们表示,这些“第三空间”对于人们的健康和幸福至关重要。连线来自伦敦的嘉宾,Debbie Laliberté Rudman 是西部大学(Western University)职业治疗学院的一位杰出大学教授。Corey Horowitz 是 Dialogue 公司的助理兼高级城市规划师。Saeed Yasin 是一名文化项目策划人,也是 It's Okay Studios 的创始人。先生们,非常感谢你们来到演播室。Debbie,感谢您在线上加入我们。Saeed,我首先来问你。在你的职业生涯中,你大部分时间都在参与创造欢迎人们的空间。跟我们说说你的最新项目,It's Okay。
Original English
Jeyan: But now its future is up in the air. And the reason will sound familiar to anyone who has watched the city change over the years. A proposed condo development. But community members and Sneaky Dee's fans aren't willing to give up without a fight. We look at why so many people are coming together to protect a dive bar, and who has the power to save it. But first, what does Sneaky Dee's have in common with coffee shops, bookstores, and parks? Well, they're all examples of third places, meaning they're not home or work. We dig into why third places are so important for building community and what we lose when they disappear. Welcome to The Rundown. Back in the 80s, sociologist Ray Oldenburg coined the term third place. It's where we gather, apart from home and work in a spirit of camaraderie and joviality, and we enjoy one another's company. And experts say these third places are crucial for health and happiness. From London, Debbie Laliberté Rudman is a distinguished university professor in the School of Occupational Therapy at Western University. Corey Horowitz is an associate and senior urban planner at dialogue. Saeed Yasin is a cultural programmer and founder of It's Okay Studios. Gentlemen, thank you so much for joining us in studio. Debbie, thank you for joining us on the line. Said, I'm coming to you first. You have been involved in creating welcoming spaces for much of your career. Tell us about your latest venture. It's okay.
Saeed Yasin: 是的。It's Okay。你知道的,它的诞生,其实是源于一种……没有归属感,或者说感觉自己没有一个可以安身的空间。我觉得我的目标某种程度上已经转变成了成为一个空间提供者,以及一个社区枢纽。所以我创建了这个叫 It's Okay Studios 的东西。它一开始是一个多学科的系列音乐会,会突然出现在各种非传统的场馆里。整个理念就是,你知道的,第一次把人们带入一个空间,一个没有任何特定社区占领的空间,在那里,长得像我这样的人可以进来享受一整晚的音乐。而现在,它已经孕育发展成了一个位于 Queen 街和 Augusta 街交汇处的实体社区枢纽,人们可以来到这里,使用这个空间。
Original English
Saeed Yasin: Yeah. It's okay. You know, it was birthed out of, you know, just like a sense of like, not or not feeling, you know, having a space where I could be. And I feel like my, my goal has kind of shifted into becoming like a space provider and a kind of like a hub for community. So I built this thing called it's okay Studios. It started as like a multidisciplinary concert series that would pop up in like various non-traditional venues. And the whole thing was, you know, bringing people into a space for the first time, a space that no community has claimed to where folks who look like me can come in and enjoy a night of music. And it kind of spawned now into having like a physical community hub at the corner of Queen and Augusta, where folks can come in and access space.
Jeyan: 我觉得当我看到 It's Okay 这个名字的时候,其中一个问题就是,这个名字是怎么来的?它背后有什么故事?因为我会觉得它很棒(awesome),它更好(better),但它叫“it's okay”(还行/没关系)。这究竟意味着什么?
Original English
Jeyan: One of the questions I think when I saw it's okay, what's the name? What's the story behind it? Because I would say it's awesome. It's better, but it's okay. What does that mean?
Saeed Yasin: 没错,这不是一个多么伟大的故事。我不知道,我这辈子一直都在餐厅工作,而多伦多很多高级餐厅的心脏和灵魂,其实是斯里兰卡社区的员工。老实说,有很多次,我和这些伙计们一起工作,问他们是否需要支持或者需要帮忙。他们总是会告诉我一切都好(everything was okay)。而且,取决于他们说话的语调,那可能是“我没事,没事,没事”(I'm okay, okay, okay),或者“我很好”(I'm okay)。所以,这算是一个比较迂回的命名由来,但它就是从那里来的。不过,人们也算是在某种程度上接受了它,看到了它的存在,并且赋予了它属于他们自己的意义。
Original English
Saeed Yasin: Yeah, it's not a great story. I don't know, I worked in restaurants for my, my whole entire life and the heartbeat of a lot of fine dining restaurants in Toronto is the Sri Lankan community. And honestly, I, a lot of times it was like, you know, working with these folks and asking them if they were like, you know, needed support or needed help. And they would just always tell me everything was okay. And depending on the tonality of how they said it, it was either I'm okay, okay, okay, or I'm okay. And it was like, so it's kind of a roundabout name, but that's kind of where it comes from. But, but people have kind of taken it as, as you know, they've seen it and made it their own thing.
Jeyan: 我正想说,作为一个泰米尔人,我非常了解这些故事。
Original English
Jeyan: I was going to say as a as a Tamil person, I know those stories very well.
Saeed Yasin: 绝对的。
Original English
Saeed Yasin: Absolutely.
城市规划与公共空间的有机性
Jeyan: 就是这样。Corey,作为一名城市规划师,帮我理解一下,我想探究一下你的思维方式。在设计城市时,你是如何将公共空间纳入考量的?
Original English
Jeyan: So there you go, Corey, as an urban planner, help me understand, I want to get into your brain here. How do you design a city with public space in mind?
Corey Horowitz: 是的。所以在我的工作中,我认为,传统上我们可以做的是,在建筑中融入、或者划出一块空间来用于你所熟知的传统公共空间,比如公园、社区中心、图书馆等等。但更困难的是什么呢?而且,这还是在特定地块开发、单一项目或者某个街区大型长期规划的层面上。但更困难的其实是,如何通过规划、通过城市设计来界定这些空间的质量和特征。这就涉及到了类似有机特质(organic qualities)的东西。你如何允许社区去占据、去挪用这些空间,并以对他们有价值的方式来使用它们?当谈论到旧建筑的重新开发和替换时,很多都与此相关。我又要抛出一个城市规划师的老生常谈了,正如我们经常做的那样,提到 Jane Jacobs 以及老建筑的价值。城市需要老建筑。我只是觉得,对于获得那些充满特色、能给社区带来场所感(sense of place)的空间来说,这是一个必不可少的特质,而不是仅仅说,“我们要在这里建一个新的社区中心”,尽管我们显然也需要这些东西。
Original English
Corey Horowitz: Yeah. So in my work, I think, you know, traditionally it is something we can do to build in, carve out space for, you know, your traditional public spaces like a park, a community centre, a library, what have you, what's more difficult? And also, you know, that's at the scale of site specific development, a single project or a larger long term plan for a neighbourhood. But what's more difficult is defining the quality and the character of these spaces through planning, through urban design. It's getting at like the organic qualities. How do you allow for communities to to kind of appropriate these spaces, to use them in a way that's valuable for them? And, you know, a lot of that has to do with when you're talking about redevelopment, replacement of old buildings. I'll come back to an urban planner cliche mentioning Jane Jacobs, as we often do, the value of old buildings. Cities need old buildings. And I just think that that's a quality that's essential to getting, you know, character filled spaces that are, you know, a sense of place for communities rather than just saying, you know, we're going to put a new community centre here, which we obviously need that stuff as well.
Jeyan: 我想象公众咨询也是这个过程的一部分,为了更好地理解社区。
Original English
Jeyan: I imagine public consultation, part of the process, understanding sort of the community as well.
Corey Horowitz: 是的。而且我认为,你能越直接地与社区公众互动,让他们将自身的需求和优先级反馈到一个新项目的规划或设计中,以及促成直接的社区行动,就越好。我们看到很多社区草根团体、非营利组织,比如社区土地信托(community land trusts)这样的事物正在涌现,它们正在成为更直接地界定社区需求的方式。
Original English
Corey Horowitz: Yeah. And I think like the more directly you can engage with the public in communities and have their, their needs, their priorities feed into a plan for a new project or a design and, you know, direct community action. You know, we're seeing a lot of community grassroots groups, non-profit groups, things like community land trusts coming up as ways to more directly define what communities need.
第三空间与社会孤立危机
Jeyan: Debbie。你的研究着眼于这里面的利害关系,也就是说,当本地企业倒闭,社区失去了这些“第三空间”时,究竟会发生什么?
Original English
Jeyan: Debbie. Your research looks at sort of what's at stake in terms of, you know, when local businesses close and communities lose those third places, what exactly what exactly does happen?
Debbie Laliberté Rudman: 嗯,我认为有大量证据告诉我们,这些让人们和社区能够聚在一起并感受到联系的场所,对于个人和社区的健康极其重要。我认为这正是真正的利害所在。2023年美国外科总监(US Surgeon General)的一份报告特别指出,社会连结度(social connectedness)是预测社区健康状况的一个非常重要的指标。这种连结度关乎社区生命力和社会凝聚力,但却是一个常常被严重低估的因素。报告还明确指出了我们需要怎样的社会基础设施,才能让人们聚在一起,不再感到孤独。有很多证据表明,很大一部分人口确实感到孤独。美国外科总监甚至估计,经常感到孤独对健康的危害,等同于每天抽15支烟。 所以我认为,这些对健康的影响,以及对社区活力的影响,正是我们面临的利害关系。
Original English
Debbie Laliberté Rudman: Well, I think there's a lot of evidence to tell us that these places where people and communities can come together and feel connected are really important to individual and community health. And I think that's really what's at stake. A 2023 US Surgeon general's report really pointed to social connectedness as sort of this such an important predictor of the health of communities. So community vitality, social cohesion, but a really underappreciated thing. And it really pointed to the kinds of social infrastructures we need for people to come together and not feel lonely. And there's a lot of evidence to show that a significant proportion of populations do feel lonely. And the US surgeon General actually estimated that feeling lonely most of the time. Is this harmful to health as smoking 15 cigarettes a day? So I think, you know, the health effects as well as that effect on community vitality are what's at stake.
Jeyan: 请帮我理解一下,Debbie。在创造这些空间的过程中,责任到底在谁身上?因为你看,我们有草根组织,我们也有城市规划师,但是这到底应该是谁的角色?
Original English
Jeyan: Help me understand, Debbie. Where does the responsibility lie in creating those spaces as we have, you know, say, grassroots, you know, we have an urban planner, but where does whose role is that?
Debbie Laliberté Rudman: 嗯,我认为这完全取决于伙伴关系(partnerships)。在听了其他两位嘉宾的发言后,我非常认同让社区参与进来的理念,以及对空间进行“挪用”(appropriating)的理念,也就是让社区有一定的空间和自由度,去创造适合他们的场所,而不是采取一种预设好的、自上而下的方式。但是,正是因为考虑到这会对健康、社会活力和社区安全产生深远影响,这也同样是市政府以及省级政府的职责所在,这正是他们的责任领域。他们需要思考:如何设立资金支持?如何制定能够支持这类社区空间的区划法规(zoning)?
Original English
Debbie Laliberté Rudman: Well, I think it's all about partnerships. And I really, in listening to the other two panel members, this idea of the community being part of this, the idea of appropriating spaces, so communities having some latitude and freedom to create the spaces that work for them, rather than this kind of predetermined top down. But because I think of the impacts on health and social vitality and community safety, this is also a role for municipalities as well as at the provincial level, where those responsibilities lie and thinking about how can the funding be created, how can the zoning be created that supports this kind of community space?
创建独立空间的现实困境
Jeyan: Saeed,你来帮我梳理一下这其中的一些挑战,也就是要让一个空间从无到有建立起来面临的困难。你在这一领域已经深耕几年了。
Original English
Jeyan: So you'd help me understand a little bit of the challenges in terms of, you know, getting a space off the ground. You've been in this space for a couple of years now.
Saeed Yasin: 是的,我们在这里已经四年了。没错。我的意思是,建立一个社区空间,一个DIY的空间,绝非易事。这是肯定的,里面根本赚不到什么钱。发展路线令人困惑,而且很多时候这些空间都处于风雨飘摇之中。即便是我们目前所在的空间,我们之所以能拿到它,仅仅是因为这里未来将会被改建成一个公园。所以,我们就拿到了一份有点滑稽的过渡性租约(meanwhile lease),在拥有这个空间的这段时间里,我们也算想尽办法让一切运转起来。但是,挑战确实非常多,我觉得。我不认为人们真正理解这些空间的必要性。我不认为,在很深的层面上,这种缺乏归属感、没有一个安全的去处可以依托的感觉,会成为那些掌握决策权的人的首要考量,他们本有能力为这些空间的生存开辟道路。所以,我觉得这不是一个优先事项,因此,这个重担就落在了社区成员的肩上。很多时候,创建这些空间就像是一种创伤后反应(trauma response),去建立一个你年轻时渴望拥有的东西。而 It's Okay,绝对就是那个我希望我年轻时能拥有的地方。
Original English
Saeed Yasin: Yeah, we've been here for four years. Yeah. I mean, building a community space, a DIY space is like, no, no, easy endeavour. It is definitely there's like, no, no money in it. The roadmap is confusing and a lot of times these spaces are precarious. Even in the space that we're in currently, it's we were only able to access it because it's going to become a park. So, you know, we have had this kind of funny meanwhile lease and we've been able to kind of like make things work while we've had the space. But yeah, the challenges are many, I think. I don't think people really understand the, the need for these spaces. I don't think like on a, on, on a, on a deep level, you know, the space, the feeling of, you know, not belonging, not having a safe space to go to isn't top of mind for a lot of folks who have the decision power to, you know, to, to be able to create through ways for these spaces to exist. So it's not a priority, I don't think, you know, and so the, the burden is left for, you know, community members who a lot of times, you know, it's like a trauma response, you know, creating these spaces, like building something that you wish you had when you were younger. And it's okay. It's definitely something that I wish I had when I was younger.
Jeyan: Corey,我知道你是个音乐迷。当像多伦多的 Sneaky Dee's 这样的一家独立音乐场馆——它曾经是无数乐队和音乐人的起步跳板——面临被重新开发的风险时,究竟有什么东西会随之消亡?
Original English
Jeyan: Corey, I understand you're a music fan, and when an independent music venue like Toronto, Sneaky Dave, which has been a launch pad for many, many bands and musicians, is at risk of redevelopment, what dies with it?
Corey Horowitz: 是的,我认为这其中的挑战在于,什么是替代品?或者说,你该如何接近、哪怕只是部分替代像 Sneaky Dee's 这种经过几十年发展沉淀下来的事物的价值?有些人可能会看着它说,那不过是个低档酒吧(dive bar),但它的意义远不止于此。它的节目安排有很多微妙之处。它提供了一个表演场地,举办过问答之夜(trivia nights),等等各种各样的活动。我认为,当你对这样一个地块进行重新开发时,毫无疑问,即将拔地而起的是一栋高耸的共管公寓或公寓大楼。我们确实需要住房,这一点我不会反驳。但在我看来,试图在一栋闪亮的新建筑中复制或替换那种性质的空间,正是挑战的一大核心。你甚至无法想象把 Sneaky Dee's 塞进那样一栋新建筑的裙楼里,对吧?我认为现在开始涌现出一些工具,比如通过多伦多市政府,或者通过社区驱动的倡议,来识别和保护这些空间的价值。但对我来说,关键在于你失去了什么。我的意思是,你失去的是一个社区的纹理(texture),是那种有机生长的场所感。当这种事情在一个街区或一个社区里一遍又一遍地发生时,一切就会变得更加同质化(homogeneous)。对吧?
Original English
Corey Horowitz: Yeah, I think the challenge with that is what is the replacement or how do you come close to even replacing the value of something that has developed over decades, like a sneaky Dee's? You know, some people might look at it and say it's a dive bar, but it was a lot more than that. There was a lot of nuance to the programming. It offered a performance venue, you know, trivia nights, whatever it may be. And I think when you redevelop on a site like that, and presumably what's coming in is, you know, a tall condo or apartment building and, you know, we need housing. I wouldn't argue otherwise, but trying to replicate or replace that kind of space in a shiny new building to me is, is a big part of the challenge. And so it's like, can you imagine Sneaky Dee's being even in the podium of a new building like that? And I think there are some tools that are starting to emerge, you know, through the city of Toronto, for example, through community driven initiatives that Recognize and protect the value of of those spaces. But to me, it's what you lose. I mean, it's the texture of a community. It's that organic sense of place. It's, you know, it becomes more homogeneous when this happens over and over again on a, on a block or in a neighbourhood. Right?
Jeyan: Saeed,你来更详细地帮我了解一下社区所面临的挑战。你提到过,你希望自己曾经能拥有一个像 It's Okay 这样的地方。当人们打电话来询问你们提供的这个场地时,他们在寻找空间时都遇到了哪些难题?当你听到他们说:“太好了,很高兴有这么个地方存在,我们之前一直找不到场地”时,你通常会听到些什么反馈?
Original English
Jeyan: So you help me understand a little bit more in sort of detail the challenges for communities. You talked about, you know, you wish you had a place like, it's okay when people are calling to inquire about the space that you are offering, what are the challenges of finding space? What do you hear from them being like, okay, you know, we're happy that this place exists. We haven't been able to find one.
Saeed Yasin: 当然。我的意思是,首先有财务上的障碍。东西都变得很贵,尤其是在疫情结束之后,对于音乐人来说更是如此。我听过无数次抱怨:“哎呀,我订了这个场馆,但他们要从我的门票收入里抽成。而且还有吧台最低消费要求和场地租赁费。”他们会觉得:“这根本不可持续啊。”所以,一方面是财务上的压力;另一方面,仅仅是出于最基本的尊重问题。去到一个场地,我有钱支付费用,但他们对待我的态度却好像我还得去赢得他们的尊重,好像我不是一个花了钱的顾客。所以我觉得,当人们来到我这里时,他们感受到的是一个真正理解他们的人。我无数次穿过他们正在穿的鞋子,体会过他们的处境。那些不被尊重、被低估的记忆深深地刻在我的脑海里。所以,对,这是两个最主要的挑战。除此之外,还有对灵活空间(flex space)的缺乏。我不认为这座城市里有足够多的灵活空间——它既可以是一个音乐表演场地,也可以是一个艺术画廊。很多时候,空间都被死死地框定在某一种单一的功能里。并且,很多提供空间的人无法在他们原有的定位之外去想象空间的潜力,比如他们会想:“我们就是一个音乐场馆”,“我们就是一家画廊”。所以我觉得,灵活性的缺失也是目前的一个重大问题。
Original English
Saeed Yasin: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, you know, there's financial barriers. You know, there's, you know, things are expensive, especially coming out of the pandemic, you know, especially for, for musicians, like the amount of times I've heard, you know, oh, I booked this venue, they're taking a cut of my door. There's a bar minimum and a rental fee. And they're like, this is not sustainable, you know? And so, so there's financial just just respect, you know, I'm going to a space, I have the money to pay for it. But they treat me as if, you know, I need to earn their respect and I'm not a paying patron. And so I think what people get when they come to me is like, you know, someone who understands, you know, I've been in those shoes a countless amount of times. So many that those memories are just like burrowed into my brain, you know, of just times I was treated less than. And so, yeah, I mean, those are two, I think two of the two of the main ones. But and also just like flex space, I don't think we have enough of that in the city where it could be a music venue, it could also be an art gallery. I think spaces, a lot of times are kind of boxed in into one thing. And a lot of those times, those people who offer space can't see their spaces beyond, you know, we are a music venue, we are a art gallery. So, you know, I think flexibility is something also that is missing.
第三空间的商业化危机与多元需求
Jeyan: Debbie。正如你指出的,疫情暴露了很多问题,而且我们未必已经从那几年的阴影中恢复过来。关于城市在填补第三空间空缺方面的做法,你有什么担忧?会不会有一天,我们将不再有第三空间了?
Original English
Jeyan: Debbie. As you noted, you know, the pandemic highlighted a lot and we haven't necessarily recovered from those years. What are your concerns with how cities are sort of filling in the gaps when it comes to third places? Will there be a day when we don't have necessarily third spaces?
Debbie Laliberté Rudman: 嗯,我认为我们必须比目前更加深刻地认识到它们的重要性。此外,我觉得这其中也涉及空间不稳定性与社会不稳定性的交叉问题。所以我们还要思考:这些第三空间是为谁设立的?是为了什么目的设立的?就像 Saeed 提到的弹性空间的想法就非常棒,因为不同的群体可能会因为不同的原因、为了寻求不同形式的连结而走进那个空间。所以,跳出传统的思维框架去思考。我认为另一个巨大的威胁是许多第三空间的严重商业化。由于疫情期间当地的小餐馆或小俱乐部纷纷倒闭,随之而来的切入点就是那些更大型、更同质化的企业进驻,而这些企业实际上并没有解决人们面临的种种障碍,比如负担能力的问题,或者是人们可能面临的各种形式的歧视。所以我觉得,我们需要审视空间不稳定性与社会不稳定性的交汇处。我们知道,社会中有特定的群体面临着高得多的社会断联风险,比如低收入的老年人,或者性别多元的人士。还有年轻人也是一个需要关注的群体。所以,我们要思考那些面临社会孤立风险的群体,然后思考实际上到底有哪些空间可以供他们去建立联系。
Original English
Debbie Laliberté Rudman: Well, I think. We have to Recognize the importance of them more than we do at this point in time. And I think it's also that intersection of spatial precarity and social precarity. So it's also thinking about third places for whom and for what. So, you know, that idea of flex spaces works really well because different communities might enter that space for different reasons and for different forms of connection. So thinking kind of outside of the box, I think the other big threat is the commercialisation of a lot of third places and the sort of big commercialisation. So the loss of things like local diners or local clubs during the pandemic and this sort of entry point of these larger kind of homogeneous businesses that really don't deal with those barriers, like affordability or various forms of discrimination that people might be facing. So I think it's looking at those intersections of spatial and social precarity. And we know that there are particular groups in society who are at much higher risk of experiencing social disconnectedness, such as older adults who are low income or persons who are gender diverse. And so thinking about youth as another group. So thinking about the groups that are at risk of social precarity, and then thinking about what spaces actually exist for them to connect.
Jeyan: Corey,成功看起来是什么样的?当我想到城市规划师时,我觉得很多工作都集中在前期,你们参与规划阶段、咨询流程,这一切看起来是怎样的?但对一个城市规划师来说,什么才是真正的成功?
Original English
Jeyan: Corey, what does success look like? When I think of an urban planner, I think of it sort of front loaded where you are in the planning stages, consultation process, how does this all look? But what does success actually look like for an urban planner?
Corey Horowitz: 这是个难题。这需要逐个项目具体考虑,也关乎规模的问题。但归根结底,如果我能简单概括一下,那就是在一个项目中实现用途的完整混合(a complete mix of uses)。如果你谈论的是街区层面,显然这可以涉及多种不同的土地用途,不仅是拥有一堆高层住宅楼,还要有补充性的空间、社区空间、公园、图书馆,以及拥有我们刚才提到的那种更灵活的、可以被社区“挪用”或改造的空间。无论是可供使用的室内活动场地,还是那些功能设定没那么僵化、可以随着时间推移去适应调整的空间。所以我认为,我考虑的是一个完整社区的视角(complete community lens)。
Original English
Corey Horowitz: Tough question. It's it's a project to project consideration and it's a matter of scale. But ultimately I, if I could simplify it, it's having a sort of a complete mix of uses on a project. So if you're, you know, if you're talking at the neighbourhood level, obviously that can involve a number of different land uses, not just having, you know, a bunch of residential towers, but having the supplementary spaces, community spaces, parks, libraries, and having those more flexible spaces that can be, like we've said, appropriated by the community, whether that be indoor, you know, event spaces available or just sort of less fully programmed type spaces that can be adapted over time. So I think it's just, you know, I think about a complete community lens.
Jeyan: 我们放眼整个安大略省来看,有没有哪个地方的例子是你看完之后觉得,“我希望我们能多做一些类似的”?
Original English
Jeyan: Is there and we can look at it sort of across the province. Is there an example of a place that you look at and be like, I wish we did that more.
Corey Horowitz: 你是指在什么方面?
Original English
Corey Horowitz: As in like.
Jeyan: 在什么方面?对。比如在社区方面,在第三空间方面,以及所有这些元素融合在一起的方面。
Original English
Jeyan: In terms? In terms, yeah. In terms of this community, in terms of a third place, in terms of all of these all meshing together.
Corey Horowitz: 既然我个人对可负担住房和包容性社区有着强烈的兴趣,我经常会想到多伦多的 Saint Lawrence 街区。就他们那种非常宜居的尺度而言,它在人口密度上是很高的,但设计质量很高。而且它拥有一个巨大的线性公园空间,可以被用于各种不同的活动。它内置了娱乐设施,并且拥有连接行人和自行车的流动网络。它就是那种我们经常寻找的极佳的混合体。但这似乎在很多项目中是无法复制的,部分原因在于,它在当时获得了一大笔省级资金的注入,这才是让它能够拥有混合房屋类型和多种负担水平的关键。
Original English
Corey Horowitz: I mean, so I come from a place of a strong interest in affordable housing and inclusive communities. And I think of the Saint Lawrence neighbourhood in Toronto often just in the way that they have a very liveable kind of scale. It's dense in terms of the population, but it's a high quality design, and it has, you know, a massive linear park space that gets used in different ways. It has recreational uses built in. It has like connect mobility connections for pedestrians, for cycling. It's just that that jumble, that that great mix that we often look for. And it's something that can't be replicated, it seems on a lot of projects, partly because of, you know, it received at the time a lot of provincial funding for one thing, for to have a mix of housing types and affordability levels.
草根组织的资金与政策困局
Jeyan: Saeed,正如你所提到的,社区与 It's Okay 这个空间产生了强烈的共鸣。我很好奇,在创造更多第三空间方面所面临的阻碍和挑战中,如果你有机会对政策制定者或各级政府官员建言,你会告诉他们什么?我知道资金绝对是一个问题,但你还遇到了哪些你认为决策者可以去解决的阻碍?
Original English
Jeyan: So as you mentioned, community has really resonated with it's okay. And the space there, I'm curious in terms of the roadblocks and challenges in creating more third third spaces or places, what would you be telling policymakers, you know, or levels of government when it comes to? I think money is one thing for sure, but what are some of the roadblocks that you've hit that you think could be addressed with these decision makers?
Saeed Yasin: 当然。我的意思是,艺术资金正在被削减,这是我们都知道的。我认为应该为实体空间开放更多资金,我们在各个层面都在流失空间。我觉得需要为草根组织、中小型艺术机构或社区组织创造更多获取资金的途径。你去看看是谁在拿这些钱,很多时候都是那些大型机构,年复一年地拿钱。而且我不认为有任何人曾去审查过这些机构的产出或实际做出的工作,只是因为他们历史上一直得到资助。我觉得必须有人开始审视它们的影响力。因为当你投资一个中小型组织时,产出会大得多得多。老实说,我们能够做到的一切,我们的空间,对我而言每天都像是个奇迹。人们在这里第一次实现了他们的梦想,你明白我的意思吗?他们在这里举办了他们的第一次画廊展览,第一场音乐会,第一次活动策划。而这种机会是非常少见的。所以我认为,我们需要看看如何资助那些深耕于底层的人,所有的事物都是从地下萌芽,然后破土而出的,你明白吗?所以,如果你投资这些小事物,它们最终会成长为庞然大物。It's Okay 现在某种程度上已经成为了一个很重要的机构,但它也是从一个婴儿般的小项目开始的。
Original English
Saeed Yasin: Yeah. I mean, you know, arts funding is being cut. We know that. And I think opening up more, more funding for for physical spaces, you know, we're losing spaces just kind of across the board. And I think, yeah, creating more throughways for, for, yeah, for also just like grassroots and small midsize arts organisations or community organisations to access funding, you know, you look at who gets money and a lot of times it's just kind of these like big organisations that get money year after year after year after year. And I don't think anyone ever examines like, you know, the, the output or the, the work that's being done at, you know, with those organisations, it's kind of just like they've been historically funded. And I think someone needs to start looking at, you know, the, the impact because when you invest in a small or midsize Organization, the, the output is so, so, so, so much more, you know, like the amount of things that we've been able to do. Our space is honestly just so remarkable to me. Every day, you know, that people have been able to do their thing for the first time, you know what I mean? And, you know, put together their first gallery, their first concert, their first activation, you know what I mean? And those opportunities are few and far between. And so I think just like looking at how we can fund folks who are everything kind of bubbles from the underground to, you know what I mean? So if you're investing in these small things, they become big things eventually and it's okay, kind of has become a big thing. But it started as like a little baby thing, you know?
Jeyan: 说得非常好。Debbie,我很好奇,你刚才稍微提到了一点,但我们究竟该如何在“拥有一个可以让人闲逛、逗留而不会觉得必须点杯喝的才能待下去的地方”和“确保经济压力下的平衡,让这些小企业在月底有钱交房租”之间取得平衡?
Original English
Jeyan: Very good. Debbie, I am curious, you talked a little bit about it, but how do we move forward with sort of balancing having places to hang out and linger and not feel like I have to order a drink and you keep the things flowing, but also making sure that there's there's a balance with the economic pressure that, you know, those small businesses do have money to, to sort of pay their rent at the, at the end of the month.
Debbie Laliberté Rudman: 是的。我认为应该有容纳多种多样第三空间的空间。其中一些可能会与盈利动机或商业动机挂钩,而另一些则不会。所以对我来说,问题不在于只拥有利润驱动的第三空间,也不是要否定它们,而是要考虑那些非营利组织,或者真正提供低成本选择的场所。有些地方的最终目标并非盈利,这可能听起来有些打破常规。但我认为,当我们考虑公共场所时,我们必须考虑到它们不一定非得是商业化的场所。作为一名职业治疗师,我也会思考那种“为了行动而存在”(spaces for doing)的空间,那些吸引人们聚在一起共同做某事的空间。所以在我看来,不仅仅是提供社交的空间,通常是那种“做事”(doing)的元素把人们吸引到一起的,不管那是一个艺术空间、咖啡馆,或者是大家聚在一起打牌的地方,又或者是人们聚集在公园里一起锻炼的地方。对我来说,通过大家共同想做的事情的吸引力,把人们聚集在一起,这才是最重要的事情。然后再去思考在商业化的第三空间和非商业化第三空间之间取得平衡。
Original English
Debbie Laliberté Rudman: Yeah. Well, I think there's, there's room for diverse kinds of third places. And some of them might be connected to that profit motive in that, that kind of business motive and others might not be. And so to me, it's not the idea of only having like profit driven third places, but also not negating profit driven third places, but also thinking about not for profits or places where it really is about that low cost option. And the endpoint isn't profit, which may seem a bit out of the box. But I think when we think about public places, we have to think about the fact that they they don't necessarily need to be commercialised places. And as an occupational therapist, I'm also thinking about spaces for doing right spaces that draw people in to do things together. So to me, it's not just about spaces to socialise, but it's often that that doing element that draws people in, whether it's an art based place or cafe or a place where people come together to play cards, or a place where people come together to do exercise together in a public park. To me, it's that bringing people together through this draw of something they all want to do together is the most important thing. And then thinking about a balance between sort of commercialised third places and then non-commercial third places.
Jeyan: 好的,我希望今天这里对你们三位来说也是一个第三空间。我知道你们都很忙,但我非常感谢你们付出的时间以及就这个问题提供的深刻见解。Debbie, Corey, Saeed,非常感谢。
Original English
Jeyan: Well, I hope this was a third place for all three of you today. I know that you guys have busy schedules, but I really appreciate your time, your insights on this. Debbie Cori said, thank you so much.
嘉宾: 非常感谢。
Original English
Guests: Thanks so much.
嘉宾: 谢谢,谢谢,谢谢你们。
Original English
Guests: Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Sneaky Dee's 的保卫战与城市的灵魂
Jeyan: 组织者们正在发起请愿,挤满了多伦多市政厅的各个委员会会议室。他们的目标是拯救这座城市传奇的低档酒吧之一——Sneaky Dee's。George Montrose 是 Sneaky Dee's 的总经理,他在 Sneaky Dee's 的二楼加入了我们的连线。你最近过得怎么样,George?
Original English
Jeyan: Organisers are starting petitions and filling committee rooms at Toronto City Hall. Their goal to save one of the city's legendary dive bars, Sneaky Dee's. George CEO Montrose is the general manager of Sneaky Dee's, and he joins me from the second floor of Sneaky Dee's. How are you doing, George?
George Montrose: 我今天过得很好。谢谢。你呢?
Original English
George Montrose: I'm doing well today. Thank you. How are you?
Jeyan: 我很好。好的。帮我们理解一下,过去几周我们在头条新闻中看到的 Sneaky Dee's 粉丝如潮水般的支持是怎么回事。看到这么多人的热爱,你有什么感受?
Original English
Jeyan: I'm doing well. All right. Help us understand sort of what we've seen over the headlines is this outpouring of support from Sneaky Dee fans over the last couple of weeks. What has it been like to see so much love?
George Montrose: 嗯,这真的有点不可思议。我们知道自己的分量,你知道的,我们清楚自己在当地音乐圈以及整个社区的地位。但是看到这一切如此真实地展现在眼前,真的令人难以置信。而且,这其实是一件好事,因为我们参与到了一场时下多伦多必须进行的对话之中。并且,我们绝对感到非常高兴。
Original English
George Montrose: Well, it's really been kind of incredible. We know we've you know, we know where we stand in, you know, in the local music scene and in the community in general. But it's it's really incredible to see it all unfold like this. And, you know, it's been, it's been really good because we've been part of a conversation that I guess has to exist in Toronto these days. And, and we, we're definitely very happy.
Jeyan: 跟我说说这场对话吧。在声援方面,我们都看到了什么?我知道人们一直在佩戴纪念徽章。人们一直在市政厅发表演讲。但当谈到我们在这座城市里看到的这场对话时,你指的具体是什么?
Original English
Jeyan: Tell me about that conversation. What have we seen in terms of sports? I know people have been wearing pins. People have been speaking at City Hall. But when you talk about sort of that conversation that we are seeing here in the city, what are you talking about?
George Montrose: 嗯,这就是,我是说,更大的对话显然是关于多伦多文化空间的流失,独立音乐场馆和独立餐厅的流失,还有这座城市逐渐被企业化(corporatisation)吞噬的趋势。这一切究竟将走向何方?而在其中,公众力量(people power)又将扮演怎样的角色?对吧?
Original English
George Montrose: Well, it's I mean, the larger conversation is obviously the loss of like, you know, cultural spaces in Toronto, independent music venues, independent restaurants, just sort of the corporatisation of the city and where it all goes from here and what role people power is going to play in it. Right?
Jeyan: 我想谈谈很多多伦多人以及城外的人与 Sneaky Dee's 之间的那种情感联结。为什么人们对你们的店有如此强烈的感情?
Original English
Jeyan: I want to I want to talk about sort of that connection that a lot of Torontonians and people outside of the city that have with Sneaky Dee's. Why do people feel so strong about your business?
George Montrose: 我是说,具体到我们这里,我一直觉得,人们会把这里当成是他们自己的地盘(their place)。无论这是他们第一次来,还是他们已经来了好几年,他们在这里都会感到舒适和宾至如归,并且能体验到一些独特的东西。这并不是说城市的其他地方就没有这些特质,而是因为我们已经存在了太久,它真的已经在很大程度上成为了多伦多本身的一部分。
Original English
George Montrose: I mean, with us in particular, I've always felt that that people think this is their place, whether it's their first time here or they've been coming here for years, they feel comfortable and at home they get to see something unique here. Not to say that that doesn't exist in other parts of the city, but because we've been around so long, it's very it's very much a part of Toronto in general.
Jeyan: 就像你提到的,Sneaky Dee's 是多伦多市内仅存的不由 Live Nation 运营的独立音乐场馆之一。这告诉了我们它在多伦多音乐界漫长历史中的什么意义?
Original English
Jeyan: As you mentioned, you know, Sneaky Dee's is one of the only independent music venues in the city not operated by Live Nation. What does that tell us about its long history in Toronto's music scene?
George Montrose: 这仅仅意味着我们是……我是说,我们依然存在,这里依然是一个人们可以去花相对便宜的门票和酒水钱看本地乐队演出的地方。而这种场所正逐渐从这座城市的版图上消失。随着年轻乐队想出人头地变得越来越难,能让他们成长和发展的空间也越来越少。我知道还有一些地方幸存了下来,但是,你知道,在疫情之前和疫情之后,这样的空间变得越来越稀缺。他们似乎并没有得到整个城市、甚至可以说是市议会层面的广泛拥抱。但是,市民们的生活绝对需要且渴求这些东西。我们填补了这一空白,我们希望能继续长期填补下去。
Original English
George Montrose: It just means that we're I mean, we still we're still a place where people can go and see, you know, local bands for, you know, relatively inexpensive, you know, ticket prices and beer prices. And that's sort of it's something that's sort of vanishing from the landscape of the city as it's getting harder and harder for young bands to break in. There's less spaces where they could come up and develop in, you know, there are a few places left. But, you know, prior to the pandemic and then post-pandemic, there are fewer and fewer. They seem to be. Not as embraced by the city at large by, by, by city council, let's say. But the the citizens definitely require that and need that in their lives. And we fill that gap, and we hope to continue filling that. For a long time.
Jeyan: 你提到了市政厅。所以我必须问一下,目前这个企业、这家店的未来处于什么阶段?我知道,这是你们在2020年就曾经应对过的讨论,而现在我们又面临同样的问题。关于重新开发项目,目前的进展如何?
Original English
Jeyan: You were talking about City Hall. So I have to ask, where do we stand right now with the business, with the business's future? I know that this is a conversation that you guys have had to sort of deal with at once in 2020, and here we are again. But where do we stand with sort of the redevelopment project?
George Montrose: 就目前的情况来看,这仍需要交由市政府去进行投票。在7月份,我们将不得不为各种必然发生的情况做准备。我们希望能继续……你懂的,在这个开发计划等待批准期间,我们希望能继续运营。我们希望即使这块地最终被开发,我们也能回到这里,再次在我们扎根了近40年的街区里经营。但是,我们也必须做好心理准备,可能会有这样一种可能性:我们要么得在过渡期间搬到别的地方,要么就是永久地搬走。
Original English
George Montrose: I mean, as it stands right now, it's still going to go to a vote to the city. And in July, you know, we have to prepare for all sorts of inevitabilities. You know, we we hope to keep, you know, pending approval of development. We hope to keep operating. We hope that if the if the property is developed, that we return here and we're able to operate once again in our in what's become our neighbourhood for the last almost 40 years. But we have to prepare for. The possibility that we might have to move somewhere in the interim, or possibly permanently.
Jeyan: 你们开始在城市其他地方寻找新地址了吗?我知道有很多人只要一看到那个街角,就会说,对,就是它,那就是标志性的一景。
Original English
Jeyan: Have you started to look in terms of locations across the city? I know a lot of people look at that corner and say, that's it's it's that is that.
George Montrose: 没错,就是那个街角。比如,你很难走到小意大利(Little Italy)或者肯辛顿市场(Kensington Market)附近而不注意到矗立在那里的 Sneaky Dee's,因为它已经在那里屹立了近40年了。但我们不……我们绝对希望留在这个街区。可是你知道,多伦多的房地产市场并不轻松,空间的租金越来越昂贵。我们走一步看一步吧,看看会发生什么。我们不得不采取一种观望的态度。
Original English
George Montrose: Corner thing. Like, it's hard to come down to Little Italy or Kensington Market and not notice the sneaky Dee's just standing there because it's been there for almost 40 years. But we wouldn't we definitely would want to stay in the neighbourhood. But you know, the real estate in Toronto is it's not easy. Spaces are increasingly expensive. We'll see. We'll see what happens. You know, it's we we have to sort of take a wait and see approach.
Jeyan: 你知道,你谈到了音乐人和对这类场地的需求。我记得,我不知道,可能是上高中的时候吧,我记得现在某个桌子上,或者墙上,或者洗手间里,很可能还刻着我的名字。但是,如果这座城市,如果市议员们最终真的决定通过那些重建计划,对于这座城市来说,除了失去一个音乐场地之外,还将失去什么?这可是一个让很多人能够仅仅点杯啤酒,吃点非常平价的玉米片,作为第三空间来享受的地方。
Original English
Jeyan: You know, you talk about the musicians and sort of the the need for spaces like that. I remember, I don't know, I think when I was in high school, I remember there's probably still, you know, my name etched on a table or on a wall or in the bathroom or something like that. But if the city, you know, if councillors do decide to accept the redevelopment plans, what does the city lose in that case? Not just as a music venue, but a third space for a lot of people just to kind of, you know, have a beer and have some very well-priced nachos.
George Montrose: 你知道,我听过很多人把这个地方描述为他们的第二个家。我也听过一些人把它描述为他们的第一故乡。我觉得,你知道的,我不想夸大我们的意义,但是,我让我们的顾客,我们的粉丝,还有那些在这里演出过的乐队,以及发生在这里的各种文化活动来说话。我让他们来表达自己对这里的感受。引用他们中一些人的话来说:这绝对是一场重大的损失。在如今这个充满孤立感的世界里,在一个被 TikTok 和 Instagram 充斥的世界里,要找到这样一个空间,让人们能够形成社区,感觉到自己是某个集体的一部分,实在是越来越难了。这是一个能让人就这么过来待着,吃着平价的墨西哥玉米片,喝着便宜啤酒,看着本地乐队演出的地方。所以,失去的是所有这一切,你知道的。
Original English
George Montrose: You know, I've heard a lot of people describe this place as their second home. I've heard some people describe it as their first home. And I feel like, you know, the I don't want to overstate what we are, but, you know, I, I let our customers and I let our fans and I let you know, the bands that play music here and the sort of cultural events that happen. I let them sort of describe what they feel about it. And to quote some of them, you know, it's it's going to be a loss. It's, it's, again, exceedingly difficult to find spaces like this where people, you know, can form communities and feel like they're a part of something when, you know, in a, in a, in an isolating world, in a world of, you know, TikTok and Instagram, this is the kind of place where people can come and just hang out and have well-priced nachos and cheap beer and watch a local band. So it's all those things, you know.
Jeyan: 刚才你提到,对于一些人来说,这不仅仅是第二个家,而是第一个家。这也让我想起了,Sneaky Dee's 是一个家族经营的企业。能够自豪地说自己是一个机构(institution),并且能够看到社区倾注了如此多的支持和爱意,这是一种怎样的体验?
Original English
Jeyan: Now, you had mentioned that, you know, for some people, this is not just their second home, but their first home, which also makes me think of, you know, this sneaky Dees is a family run business. What is it like, you know, to, to be able to say that, you know, you are an institution and that you see that sort of community outpouring?
George Montrose: 嗯,它感觉非常特别,因为,我父亲和他的兄弟们是在1987年创办这门生意的。实际上最早是在 Bloor 街的另一个位置,在 Honest Ed's 的对面,当然现在那家店也不在了。而且,我是伴随着这门生意长大的,尽管这里对我来说就像家一样,但我非常理解当人们说这是他们第一个家时的那种感受。它的确很不幸,但也可能无可避免。但是,归根结底,Sneaky Dee's 最核心的灵魂将会保留下来,它可能会搬到其他地方,或者就回到完全相同的这片土地上。我倾向于保持乐观,特别是当我看到人们如潮水般涌来的支持时。
Original English
George Montrose: Well, I mean, it, it feels very special because, I mean, my father and his brothers started this in back in 1987, actually in a different location on Bloor Street across the street from Honest Ed's, which is also gone. But the and, you know, and I grew up in this business and like, as much as it feels like home to me, I understand where people are coming from when they say this is their first home and it's, you know, it's, it's unfortunate, but it might be inevitable. But, you know, at the end of the day, the heart of what is Sneaky Dee's is going to remain and possibly move to somewhere else or might be right back in this exact space. I, I tend to be on the optimistic side, especially when I see like an outpouring of support.
Jeyan: George,我们必须在这里结束访谈了。但我非常感谢你的时间。祝愿你们在接下来的发展中一切顺利。而且我代表我们这边的几位制片人说,希望我们能尽快过去吃点玉米片喝杯啤酒,也许我们会去跑一趟。
Original English
Jeyan: George, we're going to have to leave it there. But I appreciate your time. Wish you all the best in in the sort of the next steps here and I hope I was talking to a fellow producers here that hope we can get some nachos and beer soon, so we might make a trip.
George Montrose: 如果你找不到当初刻下名字的地方了,那你只能再刻一次了。
Original English
George Montrose: If you can't find where you wrote your name, you'll have to just do it again.
Jeyan: 就这么定了。好的。真的非常感谢你。保重,George。
Original English
Jeyan: There we go. All right. Really appreciate it. Take care. George.
George Montrose: 好的,非常感谢。祝你今天过得愉快。
Original English
George Montrose: Okay. Thank you very much. Have a great day.
Jeyan: 我是 Jeyan。感谢收看《The Rundown》。我有一个问题想问你们。你们最喜欢的“第三空间”是哪里?当你们不在工作或家里时,你们都在哪里消磨时光?请告诉我们。请将你们的建议和反馈发送至 rundown@TVO.org,或者一如既往地,在我们的 YouTube 页面上给我们留言。在这之前,我们明天见。
Original English
Jeyan: I'm Jeyan. Thanks for watching The Rundown. I have a question for you. What are your favourite third places? Where do you spend your time when you're not at work or at home? Let us know. Send your suggestions and feedback to rundown@TVO.org or as always, leave us a comment on our YouTube page. Until then, I will see you tomorrow.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
公司/组织: Sneaky Dee's, It's Okay Studios
媒体/书籍: Lonely Planet, The Rundown