临时协议与海峡开放
播音员: 我们以美国和伊朗达成一项旨在结束敌对状态并重新开放霍尔木兹海峡的临时协议开启本周。这降低了石油价格,并在亚洲市场引发了缓解性反弹。两国官员目前定于6月19日在瑞士会面,届时将正式签署该协议。
Original English
Announcer: We begin the week with the US and Iran having reached an interim deal to end hostilities and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Sent oil prices lower and sparked a relief rally across Asian markets. Officials from both countries set to meet now in Switzerland on June the 19th where the agreement will be formalized.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 每个人从过去六年里都发现,这些所谓的“一次性”重大中断事件,实际上可能会频繁发生。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: Everyone has discovered from the past 6 years that these big one-off, supposedly one-off, disruptions can happen with frequency.
温·金 (Won Kim): 那是彭博社的崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway)。崔西与他人共同主持《Odd Lots》播客,她花了很多时间研究地缘政治对全球经济的长期影响。
Original English
Won Kim: That's Bloomberg's Tracy Alloway. Tracy co-hosts the Odd Lots podcast and she spends a lot of time looking at the long-term impacts of geopolitics on the global economy.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 因此,大家都在吸取的教训是:你需要建立库存,你需要在关键供应方面保持独立性,你需要拥有额外的产能。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: And so the lesson that everyone's been internalizing is that you need to build up stockpiles, you need to have independence in terms of your crucial supplies, you need to have additional capacity.
温·金 (Won Kim): 在过去的几个月里,几乎没有哪个地方比亚洲更清楚地表明了对独立性和额外产能的需求。在美国和以色列与伊朗开战后,**霍尔木兹海峡 (Strait of Hormuz)**的航运陷入停滞,几乎掐断了所有主要大宗商品的供应,其中包括全球五分之一的石油。
Original English
Won Kim: And few places have shown the need for independence and extra capacity more clearly than in Asia over the past few months. After the US and Israel went to war with Iran, the Strait of Hormuz grounded to a halt, choking off supplies of virtually every major commodity, including 1/5 of the world's oil.
唐纳德·特朗普 (Donald Trump): 但我认为中东现在会发生很多伟大的事情,而且非常重要的一点是,油价正在直线下降。
Original English
Donald Trump: But I think a lot of great things are going to happen in the Middle East right now and very importantly the oil is plummeting down.
播音员: 在法国举行的G7峰会上,特朗普总统吹嘘了美国周末与伊朗政权达成的协议,他表示这将重新开放霍尔木兹海峡。
Original English
Announcer: At the G7 summit in France, President Trump touted a deal the US reached with Iran's regime over the weekend, which he says will reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
唐纳德·特朗普 (Donald Trump): 基本上,船只已经开始出航。到周五,它将完全开放。我们得到了一点……
Original English
Donald Trump: Essentially ships are starting to go out. Now on Friday it'll be completely opened. We got a little...
战争税与需求破坏
温·金 (Won Kim): 整个亚洲的国家都在欢迎这项有助于稳定全球能源价格并重新开放关键航线的美伊和平协议。但许多人对此持怀疑态度。而且即使协议成真,对于亚洲来说,这一转变也可能是杯水车薪、为时已晚。
Original English
Won Kim: Across Asia, countries are welcoming the US-Iran peace deal that would help to stabilize global energy prices and reopen a vital shipping route. But many are skeptical that will happen. And even if it does, for Asia, that shift might be too little, too late.
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 东南亚地区特别出现了一种正在酝酿但尚未影响到食品的危机。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: There is this brewing, but not yet impacting food issue that will arise in Southeast Asia specifically.
温·金 (Won Kim): 那是彭博社的乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal)。他与崔西共同主持《Odd Lots》。
Original English
Won Kim: That's Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal. He co-hosts Odd Lots with Tracy.
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 霍尔木兹海峡的关闭将在下一个种植季节给全球大部分地区带来粮食压力。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: The closure of the Strait of Hormuz is going to create a food stress in much of the world during the next planting season.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 嗯。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: Mhm.
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 如果出现粮食压力,到那时人们会把钱花在购买食物上,而不是购买中国的各种制成品。因此,这里可能存在一种因素,即中国选择减少进口,以便其制造业的客户在明年拥有更多的消费能力。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: And if there's food stress, people will be buying food and not random manufactured goods in China come that time. And so, there may be an element where China is choosing to reduce its imports so that its customers of manufacturers have more capacity come next year.
温·金 (Won Kim): 欢迎收看彭博新闻社的《Big Take Asia》。我是温·金 (Won Kim)。今天,我与我的同事——彭博社《Odd Lots》播客的联合主持人崔西·阿洛韦和乔·维森塔尔坐在一起。我们在有消息传出伊朗和美国可能达成协议重新开放霍尔木兹海峡之前录制了这次对话。正如你们接下来会听到的那样,这场讨论在今天的重要性可以说与我们录制时完全一样。虽然重新开放海峡将是一个令人欣慰的解脱,但冲突引起的结构性转变已经从根本上改变了整个亚洲的企业。随之而来的食品和能源供应及价格压力在短期内不会消失。在今天的节目中,我们将深入探讨为什么亚洲在这场冲突中感受到的经济痛苦比西方国家更深,以及该地区和世界其他地区的“新常态”是什么样子。
虽然美伊拟定新协议的细节仍不明朗,但有一点是肯定的。伊朗的战争和霍尔木兹海峡的实质性关闭,实际上对关键产品征收了“战争税”,并影响了全球经济的每个角落。你可能已经以某种方式感受到了这种压力,但其影响分布并不均衡。像美国和日本这样的富裕国家选择消耗其原油储备。而在世界的其他角落,政府正转向需求破坏 (Demand Destruction),通过鼓励企业和消费者减少使用来应对。但这有减缓经济增长并引发衰退的风险。这是一个显而易见的差距,彭博社的崔西·阿洛韦表示,这凸显了结构性的脆弱性。
Original English
Won Kim: Welcome to the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Won Kim. Today, I'm sitting down with my colleagues Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal, co-hosts of Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast. We recorded this conversation just before news broke that Iran and the US may have struck a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. And as you'll hear, this discussion is arguably just as relevant now as when we taped it. While the reopening of the Strait would be a welcome relief, the structural shifts caused by the conflict have fundamentally changed businesses across Asia. And the resulting pressure on food and energy supplies and prices isn't going away anytime soon. On today's show, we dive into why Asia is feeling more economic pain from this conflict than Western nations, and what the new normal looks like for the region and the rest of the world. While the details of the proposed new deal between the US and Iran remain unclear, one thing is certain. War in Iran and the virtual closure of the Strait of Hormuz have effectively slapped a war tax on vital products and it's impacted every corner of the global economy. You've probably felt the pinch in one way or another, but its effects haven't been distributed evenly. Wealthy countries like the US and Japan have opted to drain their stockpiles of crude oil. In other corners of the world, governments are turning to demand destruction by encouraging industries and consumers to use less. But that risks slowing economic growth and triggering recession. It's a glaring disparity and Bloomberg's Tracy Alloway says it highlights a structural vulnerability.
昂贵的香港油价
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 这些往往是较贫穷的国家。它们没有那么庞大的石油库存储备。而我们看到全球发达国家一直在做的一件事是,真正开始动用这些储备并释放桶装油,我想是为了缓冲高油价的影响。因此对于较贫穷的国家,我认为这就是为什么在亚洲你会看到政府真正专注于需求破坏,而不是去支撑价格。因此,比如印度在鼓励人们不要乘坐飞机,敦促人们不要开车上班等等。而在需求破坏方面,中国几乎承担了所有的重任,或者说是其中的绝大部分。我看到摩根大通(JP Morgan)的一份估算显示,中国对石油的需求下降了约9%,我认为这相当于每天减少了150万桶。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: They're often poorer countries. They don't have as big stockpiles of oil inventory. And the one thing we've seen developed countries do across the world is really start to dig into those stockpiles and release barrels in order to, I guess, cushion the higher prices. And so for a poorer country, I think that's one of the reasons in Asia you're seeing the governments really focused on demand destruction rather than propping up prices. So you've had I think India was encouraging people not to go on flights. People are being urged not to drive to work, things like that. China is doing pretty much all the heavy lifting in terms of demand destruction or really the bulk of it. So I saw a JP Morgan estimate, I think, saying that demand for oil from China had fallen like 9%. I think that's 1.5 million barrels a day.
温·金 (Won Kim): 这太巨大了。
Original English
Won Kim: It's huge.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 是的,这确实是件大事,而且这与美国等真正动用储备的发达国家形成了鲜明对比。我不知道你们在这里逗留期间有没有注意到加油站的价格。你们知道香港的汽油价格是多少吗?
Original English
Tracy Alloway: Yeah, it's a pretty big deal and again, it stands in stark contrast to a lot of the developed nations like the US that are really digging into their stockpiles. You know, I don't know if you guys have noticed in your time here the prices at gas stations. Do you know how much gas in Hong Kong cost?
温·金 (Won Kim): 不知道。
Original English
Won Kim: No.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 大约每升33港元,折合下来大约是每加仑16美元。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: About 33 Hong Kong dollars per liter, which is it's equivalent of about $16 per gallon.
温·金 (Won Kim): 哇。
Original English
Won Kim: Wow.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 对吧?自伊朗战争爆发以来,这个价格上涨了约15%,而柴油价格实际上飙升了近50%。我想知道,这与我们在美国看到的情况相比如何?而且,我想更重要的是,这又是如何传导至通胀压力中的?
Original English
Tracy Alloway: Right? That's up about 15% since the Iran war began and diesel prices have actually jumped like near 50% and I wonder how does this stack up to what we've seen in the US? And and I guess more importantly, how does that feed into inflationary pressures?
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 我的意思是,如果美国有每加仑16美元的汽油,那肯定会发生革命。显而易见,由于种种原因,美国的通货膨胀正在呈上升趋势。其中一个原因就是石油。因此你可能会说,好吧,你可以把石油剔除出去,因为它影响的是名义通胀而不是核心通胀,但是当你想到,尤其是因为运输成本,几乎所有东西里都含有石油或能源成本时,它就会积累起向上的压力。再算上所有的**数据中心 (data center)**支出,整个情况就像是在对所有东西不断加温加压,而石油只是其中的一部分。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: I mean, if we had $16 gasoline in the US, there would definitely be a there would be a revolution for sure. Clearly inflation is trending up in the US for a number of reasons. One of them is oil and so you might say, well, you strip that out cuz that goes into headline rather than core inflation, but then when you think about like everything has oil or energy in it especially because of transport costs, it just builds that upward pressure. Throw in all the data center spending and the story is just like building heat and pressure on everything and oil is just part of it.
美元走强与AI开支
温·金 (Won Kim): 在一些资源有限的国家,政府别无选择,只能拉闸限电。但较富裕的国家正在玩着一场完全不同的游戏。能够负担得起这些费用的国家并没有要求公民削减开支,而是投入巨资来吸收加油站带来的价格冲击。在香港,政府拨出了相当于2.3亿美元的资金用于补贴计划,以帮助应对飙升的燃料价格。这看起来在冲突负担的分担上确实存在这种失衡,对吧?像香港和德国这样的发达经济体能够支付得起这些补贴,而一些新兴国家却连灯都亮不起。你们怎么看这种差距?我想问的是,美国决策者是否会考虑这个问题?
Original English
Won Kim: In some countries with limited resources, governments are left with little choice but to turn the lights off. But wealthier countries are playing a very different game. Instead of asking citizens to cut back, the countries who can afford it are spending heavily to absorb the sticker shock at the pump. You know, here in Hong Kong, the government is putting aside the equivalent of 230 million US dollars in a subsidy program to help manage soaring fuel prices. It does seem like there's this imbalance in how the burden of the conflict is being carried, right? You've got developed economies like Hong Kong and Germany able to afford these subsidies while you've got emerging countries who literally can't keep the lights on. What do you guys make of that disparity and I guess the question is is this something the US policy makers even think about?
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 老实说,可能并没有。对我来说,这里面有趣的一点是,美国到底能维持多久来抵消高物价带来的痛苦。他们显然已经从战略石油储备中释放了大量原油。问题是,你实际上能坚持这样做多久?显然,美国现在的储备已经非常接近其运行的最低限度了。所以我觉得——
Original English
Tracy Alloway: Probably not to be honest. One of the interesting things here is to me is how long the US can actually offset the pain of higher prices. They've obviously been releasing a lot from the strategic petroleum reserve. The question is how long can you actually keep doing it? And apparently the US is now getting pretty close to its operational minimum. So I think
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 我认为最低限度大约是2.5亿桶,而我们现在的水平是——
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: I think the minimum is like 250 million barrels and we're now at
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 3.49亿桶。是的,这是最低水平。我们已经回到了新冠疫情之后的低点。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: 349 million. Yeah, it's the lowest. We're back to the post-COVID lows.
温·金 (Won Kim): 哇,确实如此。所以美国面临的问题是,关键时刻可能会到来,对吧?就像是——
Original English
Won Kim: Wow, that's right. So the issue in the US is like crunch time could come, right? Like
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 他们很快就会失去这个缓冲空间。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: They're going to lose that buffer pretty soon.
温·金 (Won Kim): 是的。
Original English
Won Kim: Yeah.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 而且我认为亚洲似乎陷入了一个并非由其自身造成的陷阱中,对吧?全球利率都在上升,这当然是由战争冲击以及以美国和西方为中心的AI投资热潮所推动的。同时美元目前表现得非常强势。你们认为美元升值对新兴亚洲经济体有什么影响?
Original English
Tracy Alloway: And I think Asia does seem caught in this trap that really is not of its own making, right? You've got interest rates that are rising globally, of course driven by the war shocks and the AI investment boom centered in the US and the West. You've got the US dollar really strong right now. What do you think is the impact of the US dollar strengthening on emerging Asian economies?
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 非常不好。可以说,这既影响了经济增长的前景,也影响了财政方面的前景。因此,如果你花钱来补贴油价,而且在某些情况下还在消耗你的储备,那么这种情况持续得越久,代价就会越昂贵。我最近看到的一个关于金价下跌的理论是,政府或中央银行正在出售储备资产以换取更多外汇,以便他们能够以更高的价格购买更多石油。因此,这加剧了新兴市场的外汇风险敞口,并可能削弱他们未来的财政状况。
然后从经济增长来看,显然如果你无法获得石油,无法获得作为塑料原料的化工原料——这几乎存在于所有商品中——你就会看到经济活动减少。但另一方面,如果我们看到一些国家通过实际建设更多清洁能源产能(例如销售更多电动汽车)来应对高油价,那么这可能会在一定程度上刺激经济。我不是说这足以完全抵消影响,但至少能起到一些作用。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: Not good. So there's the outlook for economic growth and there's the outlook for the fiscal side, let's say. And so if you're spending money to subsidize oil prices and you're running through your stockpiles in some instances, then it becomes more expensive the longer it goes on. One of the theories I've seen for the falling gold price recently is that governments are selling or central banks are selling reserve assets in order to raise more foreign effects so that they can buy more oil at the higher prices. So it exacerbates foreign currency exposure for emerging markets and probably weakens their fiscal position in the future. And then in terms of economic growth, so obviously if you can't get oil, if you can't get feedstock for plastics, that's pretty much in everything and so you'll see less economic activity. But on the other hand, if we see some countries respond to higher oil prices by actually building out more clean energy capacity, selling more EVs for instance, then like that could be a little bit of an economic boost. And I'm not saying that it's enough to fully offset the impact, but like it's something at least.
氦气与芯片危机
温·金 (Won Kim): 那我们回到问题的背景。不管美元的价格如何,人们都会在来自韩国的**内存芯片 (memory chips)**上花费极其庞大的资金,就是这样。韩元可能上涨,也可能下跌,这都不重要。我们将向韩国和台湾输送大量的美元,以获取用于AI建设的关键基础设施。所以我认为,没错,绝对是这样,美元的强势是真实存在的,但我们正处于这样一个非常奇特的时刻:因为AI竞争让人感觉关乎生死存亡,我们过去会关注的传统宏观信号(如利率和汇率)正被所有人出于生存考量而在AI的诸多方面选择进行的支出所淹没。
Original English
Won Kim: So like let's get back to the context of the question. It doesn't matter what the price of the dollar is, people are going to spend a crazy amount of money on memory chips from Korea, period. The won could go up, the won could go down, it doesn't matter. We're going to be shipping a lot of dollars to Korea and Taiwan for key infrastructure for the AI buildout. And so I think yes, absolutely, like the strength of the dollar is real, but I think we're in this very odd moment where because the AI race feels existential, that the traditional macro signals that we would look at like rates and FX are being swamped by the spending that everyone has just chosen to make for existential reasons on so many aspects of AI.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 是的,正如你所说,亚洲是全球AI生态系统的支柱。这里的工厂生产着驱动AI革命的芯片。但这些工厂高度依赖能源和原材料,对吧?那么,如果霍尔木兹海峡持续存在不确定性或中断,会发生什么?
Original English
Tracy Alloway: Yeah, and to your point, Asia is the backbone of the global AI ecosystem. Factories here produce chips that power the AI revolution. But those factories rely heavily on energy and raw materials, right? So what happens if there's ongoing uncertainty or disruption at the Strait of Hormuz?
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 我们要聊聊氦气吗?
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: Should we do helium?
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 好啊,我刚才也正想……是的,你先说吧。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: Yeah, I was going to Yeah, go for it.
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 不,你先。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: No, you start.
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 好吧,我只是想说,我们俩同时想到了氦气 (helium)。在先进的半导体制造中,氦气是相当重要的。请别问我具体的原因,但它与它能够达到极低温度的能力有关,这在各种不同的方面都很有用。但是,氦气供应的弹性非常小。因此,如果霍尔木兹海峡的持续关闭最终与这一环节产生交叉,那将是因为他们真正耗尽了氦气。到那时,制造芯片的难度就会大大增加。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: Well, I was just going to say like both of our minds went to helium at the same time. So it's like this is uh pretty important in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, helium. Please don't ask me exactly why, but it has to do something with like its ability to go down to incredibly cold temperatures, which is helpful in all kinds of different ways. But there is not a lot of elasticity in helium supply. And so if there's going to be like one link where the persistent closure of the Strait of Hormuz might actually intersect with that, it would be if they truly run out of helium. And then you just really have a much harder time making chips.
亚洲的长期通胀压力
温·金 (Won Kim): 现在,我想稍微转向利率话题。日本的批发通胀率在5月份以三年来最快的速度加速,其**生产者物价指数 (PPI)也飙升至6.3%,这是相当高的。这给日本央行 (Bank of Japan)**加息带来了巨大压力。而在整个亚洲,你可以看到各国正在上调通胀预期,并将利率推得更高。你们认为亚洲长期通胀的更广泛影响会是什么?这对美国消费者又意味着什么?
Original English
Won Kim: Now, I want to shift to interest rates for a bit. Japan's wholesale inflation accelerated in May at its fastest pace in 3 years, and its producer price index also surged to 6.3% was quite high. That puts a lot of pressure on the Bank of Japan to hike interest rates. And across Asia, you are seeing countries raising their inflation projections and pushing interest rates higher. What do you think would be the broader impact of prolonged inflation across Asia? And what does it mean for US consumers?
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 所以,通胀影响是存在的,对吧?而且甚至不一定是石油,还有那些几乎用于所有商品的石化产品。然后就通胀而言的另一件事是,全球的政府和企业正在认识到建立库存的重要性,以及扩建你的能源产能、石化产能或芯片产能等的重要性。如果每个人都同时试图这样做,这就会消耗资源,对吧?这在实际上是具有通胀效应的。我想这大概是我们近年来共同吸取的教训:如果发生重大中断,你不想被晾在原地无所适从。拥有额外的备用物资确实非常重要。而拥有额外的备用物资,你知道的,就意味着更高的价格。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: So, the inflationary impact is there, right? And it's not even necessarily oil, it's also those petrochemicals which go into everything. And then the other thing in terms of inflation, governments and companies around the world are learning that it's important to build up stockpiles, and it's important to build out your energy capacity or your petrochemical capacity or your chips capacity, things like that. If you have everyone all at once trying to do this, that consumes resources, right? That is de facto inflationary. And I think that's probably the lesson we have collectively learned from the past few years is that you don't want to be left high and dry if there's a big disruption. It is really important to have extra stuff. And extra stuff, you know, means higher prices.
温·金 (Won Kim): 休息之后,我们将讨论为什么我们可能尚未看到霍尔木兹海峡关闭造成的全部伤害,以及战争的余波如何重塑亚洲与世界其他地区的关系。
Original English
Won Kim: After the break, why we may not yet have seen the full extent of damage caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and how the fallout from the war is reshaping Asia's relationship with the rest of the world.
东南亚潜在粮食危机
温·金 (Won Kim): 霍尔木兹海峡关闭所带来的**供应冲击 (supply shock)**可以说是有史以来最大的。但通过动用储备、寻找替代方案和管理需求,政府试图保护其公民免受痛苦,或者至少推迟痛苦。即使海峡在本周末重新开放,彭博社的乔·维森塔尔和崔西·阿洛韦也表示,痛苦可能仍在后头。较富裕的国家将能够通过支出消费来缓解它,但亚洲较贫穷的国家没有这些资源。而这可能会给每个人带来麻烦。你们在最近的一期节目中采访了一位前农民——洛肯·凯利 (Lorcan Kelly)。
Original English
Won Kim: The supply shock caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is arguably the biggest ever. But by draining reserves, finding workarounds, and managing demand, governments have tried to shield their citizens from the pain, or delaying it at least. Even if the Strait does open this weekend, Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway say that pain might still be coming. Richer countries will be able to spend to ease it, but poorer countries in Asia don't have those resources. And that could spell trouble for everyone. You guys spoke with a former farmer, Lorcan Kelly, on one of your recent episodes.
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 问题将在6个月或12个月后显现,届时我们在今天做出的决定——我是要耕种那片田地,路易丝,还是明年养殖更多的牲畜?农民们会说:“不,我们不打算这么做。”如果你看一下——
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: The problem's going to arise in 6 months, in 12 months time, when the decisions we made today about do I plant that field, Louise, or do I breed more cattle next year? And farmers are going to say, "No, we're not going to do that." If you look
温·金 (Won Kim): 你知道,现在整个东南亚的农民都在放弃这个种植季节,对吧?因为他们负担不起拖拉机的柴油,也负担不起水泵的柴油——这些是他们耕种作物所必需的。有些人甚至选择让农作物烂在田里,因为他们承担不起收割的成本。我是说,这影响巨大,对吧?我是说,亚洲——
Original English
Won Kim: You know, across Southeast Asia right now, farmers are now skipping this planting season, right? Because they can't afford the diesel for the tractors, they can't afford the diesel for the water pumps, right? That they need to to cultivate the crops. And some are actually choosing to leave crops rotting in the ground because they can't afford to harvest. I mean, that's huge, right? I mean, Asia
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 所以,这就是我之前所说的,另一只可能尚未落下的靴子是亚洲的粮食危机,这也许可以用马斯洛的**需求层次理论 (hierarchy of needs)**来解释,对吧?如果你连买食物都困难,你就不会去购买电子产品,对吧?无论是来自中国的还是其他地方的产品。因此,也许中国减少进口的部分逻辑是为了缓解一点这种挤压。但我所听到的是,东南亚地区特有的一种正在酝酿但尚未影响到食品的问题将会显现。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: So, this is what I was saying earlier, that perhaps one of the shoes that may be yet to drop is a food crisis in Asia, and it's perhaps the hierarchy of needs, right? If you're struggling to buy food, you're not going to be buying electronics, right? From China, whatever it else. And so, perhaps one part of the logic for China to reduce its imports is to ease a little bit of that squeeze. But what I have heard, which is that there is this brewing, but not yet impacting food issue that will arise in Southeast Asia specifically.
历史的种植季节教训
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 当谈到化肥的影响时,我们说的是更长的时间跨度,因为正如你刚才提到的,存在种植季节。我从**亚当·图兹 (Adam Tooze)**那里学到的一个历史轶事是,显然在古罗马时代,皇帝们会尽量调整战争的时间,使它们不在种植季节进行。这样既不会打乱粮食供应,也能让农民能够去当兵,但显然我们似乎已经忘记了这个教训。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: When it comes to the impact of fertilizer, we're talking about longer time frames cuz there are planting seasons, as you just mentioned. One historical anecdote that I learned from Adam Tooze is that apparently in ancient Roman times, emperors would try to time wars so that they weren't during the planting season. So that it wouldn't disrupt food supplies and also so that farmers could actually go off and be soldiers, but clearly we seem to have forgotten that lesson.
泰国渔民与政治隐忧
温·金 (Won Kim): 我想在粮食话题上再停留一会儿。你知道,就在几周前,我在泰国的曼谷,和我们那里的同事聊过。我是说,他们做了一些非常棒的报道,讲述了泰国的渔民如何让他们的渔船停航靠港,因为燃料消耗占了每次出海成本的一半以上。因此,他们基本上无法提高捕捞渔获的价格,对吧?所以他们决定不出海。我想知道,在何种程度上,决策者和领导人应该担心这会演变成一个政治问题,对吧?这个农业问题。
Original English
Won Kim: I want to stay on food for a bit. You know, in Thailand, I was there in in Bangkok just a couple weeks ago and talked to our colleagues there. I mean, they've done some really great reporting on how fishermen in Thailand are keeping their boats anchored because fuel eats up more than half of the cost of every trip. So, you know, they basically can't raise the the price of their catch, right? So so they they're deciding not to go out. And I wonder to what extent should policy makers and leaders worry about this, you know, turning into a political problem, right? This ag issue.
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 是的,我的意思是,听着,我不知道自己是否完全相信这个理论,但你知道,有很多人认为,例如,**阿拉伯之春 (Arab Spring)**的催化剂就是那一年的小麦价格。而我们的领导层脑子里还在想着别的事情。我们所说的是一种非常经典的、会引发真实政治动荡的事件,而且我认为我们不应该傲慢地假设这些可能拥有数千年历史数据的循环周期,会突然戛然而止。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: Yeah, I mean, look, I don't know if I ever fully bought the theory, but you know, there was a there were many people who argued, for example, that the catalyst for the Arab Spring was wheat prices that year. And you know, our leadership has other things on their mind. We're talking about this is very classic type of thing that creates real political disruption, and I don't think we should have the hubris to assume that these cycles, which have probably have data points going back thousands of years have suddenly stopped.
制裁失效与瓶颈经济
温·金 (Won Kim): 我想关于制裁,我的确在想,石油危机在多大程度上会导致美国最大的非军事武器之一——也就是制裁——失效或被削弱?
Original English
Won Kim: And I guess with sanctions, I mean I do wonder to what extent that the oil crunch would lead to the weakening of essentially one of the US's biggest non-military weapons, right? Sanctions.
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 《华尔街日报》上有一篇很有意思的文章提到,朝鲜经济的表现出人意料地好。他们实际上正在建设大量的住房,而且有相当多的证据表明他们的生活水平等正在提高。当然,这是地球上长期以来受到制裁最严重的国家之一。我只是觉得,制裁在何种程度上是一件强大的工具,或者它们是否真的能被用来击垮任何敌人,这一切现在都受到了质疑。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: There was an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal that the North Korean economy is doing surprisingly well. They're actually building a lot of housing and there's sort of quite a little evidence of like improving standard of living and so forth. And of course here is a one of the most sanctioned countries on Earth for a very long time. I just think like the degree to which sanctions are a powerful tool or that they can really be used to like crush any enemy, all of it's being called into question right now.
温·金 (Won Kim): 现在假设战争下周结束。你们认为世界因为这场战争以及它的发展方式,发生了怎样根本性的改变?
Original English
Won Kim: Now let's say the war ends next week. How do you think the world has fundamentally been changed because of this war and how it's played out?
崔西·阿洛韦 (Tracy Alloway): 所以我认为这又回到了所谓**瓶颈经济 (choke point economy)**的概念。每个人从过去六年里都发现,这些所谓的“一次性”重大中断事件,实际上可能会频繁发生,对吧?每一次中断的具体内容虽然略有不同,但它们发生的频率越来越高。我的意思是,我相信我们两个人在疫情期间都呆在香港,从现在到永远,我基本上都会在家里多备一些卫生纸。我们都吸取了教训,因此我认为这种冲动将会持续很长一段时间。
Original English
Tracy Alloway: So I think it goes back to I guess the idea of the choke point economy. So everyone has discovered from the past 6 years that these big one-off, supposedly one-off, disruptions can happen with frequency, right? So each disruption is slightly different in what it actually is, but they're happening more often. I mean, I'm sure both of us having been in Hong Kong during the pandemic, I will always keep an extra supply of toilet paper from now until forever, basically. We all learned that and so I think that impulse is going to stick around for a long time.
去全球化新常态
乔·维森塔尔 (Joe Weisenthal): 世界已经高度全球化。我觉得对于我来说,来到香港是一个非常好的提醒,让我看到这个世界仍然是多么地紧密相连。但在这些方面,齿轮的运转方向与20世纪下半叶完全相反。贸易壁垒正在增加,国家之间互不信任,这将对生产率和价格产生深远的影响。
Original English
Joe Weisenthal: Uh the world is very globalized. I feel like for me coming here to Hong Kong, it's been very helpful reminder like how integrated the world still is. But these are where the the wheels are all spinning in the opposite direction of where they were in, you know, the second half of the 20th century, trade barriers are going up and countries don't trust each other and that is going to have consequences for both productivity and prices.
温·金 (Won Kim): 这里是彭博新闻社的《Big Take Asia》。我是温·金 (Won Kim)。想要获取更多《Big Take》的内容并无限制访问bloomberg.com,请立即在bloomberg.com/podcastoffer订阅。如果您喜欢本期节目,请务必在您收听播客的任何地方订阅并评价《Big Take Asia》。这真的能帮助大家找到这个节目。感谢您的收听,我们下期再见。
Original English
Won Kim: This is the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Won Ha. To get more from the Big Take and unlimited access to all of bloomberg.com, subscribe today at bloomberg.com/podcastoffer. If you like the episode, make sure to subscribe and review the Big Take Asia wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps people find the show. Thanks for listening. See you next time.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
公司/组织: Bloomberg, Bank of Japan