探索快乐的起点:从负面情绪到行为干预
作为一名行为神经科学家,我的职业生涯起初主要聚焦于负面情绪的研究——恐惧、压力、焦虑及抑郁的症状。这并非偶然,因为抑郁症的发病率居高不下,而与绝望(包括自杀、成瘾和孤独感)相关的死亡人数在美国呈现上升趋势。尽管我们投入了大量资源和研究来理解精神疾病,但进展似乎仍显缓慢,这促使我们需要新的视角。几年前,在我撰写《摆脱抑郁》(Lifting Depression)一书时,我开始探索奖励与体力活动之间的联系。由此,我提出了一个新概念:“行为药物”(behaviorceuticals),其核心思想是我们可以有意识地改变自身行为,以达到改变神经化学、从而产生治疗效果的目的。如果你曾享受过编织、烹饪或创作艺术的乐趣,那么你就已经体验过自身的“行为药物”了。然而,这仅是轶事证据,我需要将其带入实验室,与研究伙伴——即那些实验室里的老鼠——一同深入探究。
Original English
When I first started teaching rats to drive cars, I never dreamed that those little rodents would steer me toward a surprisingly big discovery, a lesson about the importance of joy in our lives. It turns out that we had a lot to teach each other. But I'm getting ahead of myself. I'm a behavioral neuroscientist. I’m interested in brains, behavior and environment and how they influence one another. For most of my career, I've focused on the negative emotions: fear, stress, anxiety, symptoms of depression, and for good reason. Depression rates remain unacceptably high, and recent reports suggest that deaths of despair, deaths related to suicide and addiction and loneliness, are on the rise in the United States. Even though we've invested a lot of research and resources toward understanding mental illness, it seems that we have a long way to go. Perhaps we need some fresh perspectives in this area. Several years ago, when I was writing my book “Lifting Depression,” I started to investigate the connections between reward and physical effort. I introduced this term "behaviorceuticals," the idea that we can intentionally change our behavior to alter neurochemistry in therapeutic ways. If you have enjoyed knitting or cooking or producing a piece of art, you've experienced your own dose of behaviorceuticals. But that's anecdotal evidence. I needed to take this to the lab and consult with my research colleagues, that's the laboratory rats.
努力、控制与愉悦感的意外发现
在实验室里,我们开始训练老鼠通过付出体力活动来获取“水果圈”(Froot Loops),这是我实验室的通用货币,它们对这种零食非常喜爱,因此愿意为之努力。经过大约五周的训练,老鼠们需要付出体力去挖掘才能获得水果圈。实验结束时,我们观察到这些老鼠在情绪韧性、应对策略方面均有显著增强,甚至出现了神经可塑性(neuroplasticity: 大脑根据动物生命体生活需求的变化而改变的现象)的迹象——这通常被认为是神经系统健康和良好运转的表现。
随后,我们将其与对照组进行了比较。对照组获得了相同数量的水果圈,但无需付出任何体力劳动。我们将这群老鼠戏称为“信托基金老鼠”(Trust Fund Rats)。令人惊讶的是,它们并未表现出前述的益处。这一结果表明,仅仅是奖励本身不足以带来这些积极变化,更关键的似乎在于我们与奖励的关系,以及我们控制这些奖励的能力。这项关于“基于努力的奖励协议”(effort-based reward protocol)的研究虽然有趣,但它也促使我反思,在长期专注于负面情绪和压力研究后,我是否忽略了事物积极发展的可能性。是老鼠们最终指引我将目光投向了“哪些方面可以做得更好”。
Original English
So we trained them to exert physical effort for Froot Loops, and that's the currency of my lab. They love Froot Loops, so they'll work for Froot Loops. So we had about five weeks where the animals had to connect physical effort, digging up those Froot Loops. And at the end of that time, we saw that there was enhanced evidence of emotional resilience, more effective coping strategies and even signs of neuroplasticity, this idea of the brain changing in response to the changing demands of the life of the animal. And that's traditionally thought to be good and healthy for the brain. Now when we compared these animals to the control group, this was a group that received the same number of Froot Loops, but they didn't have to work for it. We called this the Trust Fund Rats group, and we did not see the benefits in these animals. So it seemed to be more than just the reward. It's our relationship with the reward and perhaps the ability to control these rewards. So this was interesting. And we did a good bit of research on what we call “effort-based reward protocol” and found some interesting findings, but I still found myself going back to these negative emotions, especially chronic stress. Investigating all the ways things can go wrong with brains. But it took the rats to point me in the direction of looking at what could go right.
探索“快乐”的科学:期待的力量与积极心理学
为了更好地理解“什么方面可以做得更好”,我需要一些背景信息。最初训练老鼠驾驶的实验,其目的是为了更深入地理解自主权(agency: 独立行动并做出自主选择的能力)以及控制感(sense of control)和技能习得(skill acquisition)对它们大脑和行为的影响。我们教会它们驾驶微型车辆,即“啮齿动物操作车辆”(ROVs)。这项研究成果颇丰,并已发表。但很快我们意识到,这个研究项目在科学传播方面潜力巨大,而这正是当下社会所迫切需要的。因此,我们决定保留一部分接受过驾驶训练的老鼠,以便继续进行科学普及工作。它们成了小有名气的“啮齿动物名人”,出现在纪录片、新闻报道和播客中。
然而,我至今仍清晰地记得,在疫情期间,当校园里空无一人、异常寂静时,我和几位同事轮流进入实验室照料这些动物。一个早晨,我走进实验室,看到老鼠们跑到笼子前,伸出小爪子,兴奋地原地跳跃。它们看起来像是在为见到我而感到高兴,如同小老鼠般的喜悦。在过往多年我对负面情绪的研究以及疫情带来的普遍消极氛围的背景下,我当即决定,无论我看到的是什么,我都想深入探究。但一个神经科学家能否在老鼠身上研究“快乐”这样复杂的情感呢?我查阅了文献,发现了一些令人鼓舞的研究。甚至找到了对非人类动物“快乐”的定义:“与喜爱的事物或事件相关的、短暂而强烈的活动爆发”。联想到我家的小狗布罗迪(Brody),每当我问它是否想出去散步,或者仅仅是拿出牵引绳时,它就会兴奋地原地打转、跳跃、发出无休止的吠叫——这似乎也符合“快乐”的定义。如果我能在狗身上看到这种迹象,那么在老鼠身上发现它就更有信心了。
为了科学地研究“快乐”,我确立了一个研究方向:期待(anticipation),即奖励发生之前的那个时间段。我深知,在实验室环境中,这个时间段是可以被操控的。我深受某项研究的启发:科学家们训练老鼠按压杠杆,以获得直接注入大脑的可卡因。当可卡因进入大脑时,其天然的“感觉良好”的神经递质——多巴胺(dopamine: 大脑天然的让人感觉良好的神经化学物质)水平会升高。但更有趣的是,当老鼠靠近杠杆、在可卡因尚未注入之前,其多巴胺水平同样会出现上升。这似乎表明,大脑在以类似的方式解读奖励本身和奖励到来之前的期待。这不禁让我思考,我们的“国父们”在强调“生命、自由和对幸福的追求”时,是否早已洞察到了这一点?
Original English
But it took the rats to point me in the direction of looking at what could go right. Let me provide a little context here. So those rats that I talked about, the driving rats, in the beginning of the talk, we originally trained them to drive to understand more about agency and a sense of control and skill acquisition on their brains and behavior. And so we taught them to drive these rodent-operated vehicles, or ROVs, as we call them. And we found some interesting findings, and we published it. But we quickly realized that this program of research had a lot of potential for science outreach. And this is something that we really need today. So we decided to keep a group of rats trained up on driving so that we could continue with this science outreach. And they became little rodent celebrities. They were in documentaries and newscasts and podcasts, and that was all great. But I remember during the pandemic, when all the students were gone, it was very quiet on campus, and a few colleagues and I were taking turns going into the lab to take care of the animals. And I vividly remember this one morning, I walked into the lab, and I saw these rats run up to the front of the cage, and they were reaching their little arms out and jumping up and down. And it looked like they were excited to see me, like little rat joy. And it made me excited that they were excited to see me. And on the heels of all the negative-emotion research that I had conducted through the years, and all the negativity of the pandemic, I decided right then and there that whatever that was I was seeing, I wanted to investigate it. I wanted to know more. But could a neuroscientist study something as complex as joy in a rat? I went to the literature and was encouraged. I even found a definition of joy in non-human animals: “a brief and intense burst of activity associated with a favored event or object.” So when my husband and I would ask our little dog, Brody, if he wanted to go for a walk or just showed him the leash and saw him running around in circles and jumping up and down and yelping endlessly, that seemed to fit the definition of joy. If I could see it in a dog, I was encouraged that we could see it in the rats. But I still needed a plan. I landed on this idea of anticipation, the time before an award, because I knew that we could manipulate that time in the laboratory. So I was encouraged and really fascinated by some research conducted by scientists, where they trained rats to press a bar to have cocaine delivered directly to their brains. And when the cocaine hit the brain, their natural kind of feel-good neurochemical known as dopamine, would rise. But what was even more interesting was when that rat would approach that bar, before the cocaine was there, you'd also see this rise in dopamine. It seemed that the brain was interpreting the reward and the time before the reward in a similar manner. It really makes me wonder what our Founding Fathers knew when they emphasized life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It's really interesting. So we had an idea: anticipation. We still needed to translate this into something that we could use in the laboratory. We came up with this protocol that we referred to as “unpredictable positive event responses,” or UPERs, in keeping with this behaviorceutical theme. So this was pretty simple. For about five weeks we introduced the rats to three good things, fun things, every day, in an unpredictable order and time. So they were exposed to a LEGO block, and they had to wait 15 minutes to get that Froot Loop, or a sunflower seed, they had to wait patiently to shell it, or they were placed in a transport cage and wheeled across the hallway into another space in the lab where they got to play around, run around in what we called Rat Park. And they had to wait in that transport cage for three minutes. We were encouraged that we were on to something when we started to observe the rats in that transport cage. And we saw brief bursts of behavior, running around, they seemed so excited. So we were encouraged that indeed, we were influencing something that looked like joy, or at least positive anticipation in these rats.
希望的科学与文化反思:超越效率的快乐
基于“期待”这一理念,我们开发了一个名为“不可预测的积极事件反应”(unpredictable positive event responses, UPERs)的实验协议。该协议非常简单:在五周的时间里,我们每天随机向老鼠介绍三种好事(有趣的事件),且顺序和时间均不固定。例如,它们可能会接触到一个乐高积木,但需要等待15分钟才能得到一个水果圈;或者得到一颗葵花籽,但需要耐心剥壳;又或者被安置在一个运输笼里,被推到实验室的另一区域,在那里它们可以在所谓的“老鼠乐园”(Rat Park)里玩耍、奔跑,但需要在此运输笼中等待三分钟。当我们开始观察老鼠在运输笼中的反应时,我们受到了极大的鼓舞——它们表现出短暂的行为爆发,兴奋地跑来跑去。这让我们确信,我们确实在影响某种看起来像是快乐,或至少是积极期待的现象。
目前研究结果仍在不断汇总中,但已初现一些趋势。在一项“老鼠乐观性测试”(rat-optimism task)中,我们发现雄性老鼠的策略从悲观转向了乐观。然而,雌性老鼠并未表现出同样的转变,它们在两组中都保持着更偏向现实的策略。这一发现(伴随笑声)表明,性别的差异在情绪反应中可能扮演重要角色。需要注意的是,此项研究的对照组是那些同时获得所有奖励的老鼠,它们没有经历期待期。我们尚不确定这一发现是否能推广到人类,特别是关于雌性老鼠的反应,但这值得进一步研究。
其他结果则在雄性和雌性老鼠中都普遍存在:当它们探索一个新环境时,会表现出更强烈的探索行为,仿佛期待会发现什么好东西。这些结果令人鼓舞。
一天,一个学生跑进我的办公室,惊讶地问道:“兰伯特博士,为什么接受UPERs训练的老鼠的尾巴会笔直地竖起来?”我从事老鼠研究已三十余年,从未见过或听说过这种现象。但深入文献后,我发现一些研究者通过注射阿片类药物(opioids)也能引起动物尾巴竖起。这让我震惊,难道我们通过“行为药物”取得的效果,与药物的效果有相似之处?这是一个需要进一步探索的领域。
这项研究也让我联想到20世纪50年代科特·里希特(Curt Richter)在约翰霍普金斯大学进行的经典研究。他对实验室老鼠和野生老鼠的游泳行为感兴趣。在充满湍流的泳池中,实验室老鼠可以持续游泳数小时甚至数天,而野外被捕获的老鼠一旦放入水中,却会立即沉没而死。里希特对此感到震惊,因为他认为野外生存环境更艰苦,野生老鼠应更具韧性。他认为它们似乎是在“放弃”。然而,当他仔细思考实验室老鼠和野生老鼠的经历后,他意识到实验室老鼠曾被人类多次抓取,它们的生活条件因此发生了变化。这意味着,如果当下状况不佳,未来是有可能改变的——这便是希望(hope)的体现。但野生老鼠从未有过这种经验。于是,里希特设计了一个干预实验:他的助手们会从约束笼或水中捞起野生老鼠一到两次。再次进行实验后,他发现大多数野生老鼠因此得以存活。他总结道,正是“获救的希望”驱动了它们。
这不禁引人深思:这对人类是否同样重要?确实,有大量研究表明,希望和积极的态度对健康和寿命至关重要。我最喜欢的研究之一是对以色列患病儿童的调查,他们是“美梦成真”(Make-A-Wish Foundation)项目的参与者。研究人员监测了他们在得知具体愿望和愿望实现之间的生理及心理健康状况——这段时间大约有五个月,他们得以延长期待期。结果显示,这些儿童的健康状况有所改善,暗示着他们在此期间的生活质量得到了提升。与此相比,那些在愿望清单上但尚未被告知具体细节(因而无法明确许愿和期待)的儿童,在收到愿望细节后,也可能从中受益。
因此,大量研究表明,理解负面情绪固然重要,但正面情绪同样不可或缺。当我们审视大脑在积极期待和快乐时的活动时,会发现有许多不同区域在此期间被激活,包括负责奖励处理、内在感受监测、规划和运动的区域。
所有这些证据——行为学、轶事、神经学——都表明正面情绪的重要性,但这种重要性并未总是在我们的文化中得到充分体现。我发现很有意思的是,我们有一个词来形容对负面事件的期待,那就是“dread”(恐惧、担忧)。但据我所知,我们似乎没有一个专门的词来描述对正面事物的期待。然而,德语中有这样一个词:“vorfreude”(vorfreude: 快乐的期待),意为“欣喜的期待”。或许是时候让我们创造一个属于自己的词汇来表达这种“快乐的期待”了。
个人而言,我时常会回到那种清教徒式的工作伦理中,习惯性地将忙碌和辛勤工作等同于美德。当我有机会看一两个小时的Netflix或做些喜欢的事时,我常常将其描述为“罪恶的快感”(guilty pleasure)。但为什么要把它视为“罪恶”呢?这些愉悦的经历和积极的事件,远非奢侈的放纵,而是对大脑健康维护至关重要且不可或缺的。
最后,我想回到那些驾驶老鼠的实验。许多人会问我:“凯莉,它们喜欢开车吗?它们享受开车吗?”我的回答通常是:“我无法给它们做问卷调查,我不太确定,但我认为它们是喜欢的。”但我们可以从行为学的角度来探究。最近,我们确实这样做了。我们给了它们一个选择:是选择一条更高效的路径走到“水果圈树”(即它们驾驶的目标),还是选择绕一段路,折返回去,跳进小汽车,然后驾驶它去获取奖励。我迫不及待地想知道它们会怎么做。结果发现,绝大多数老鼠确实选择了绕路、兜圈子,然后跳进小汽车,驾驶它们去获取水果圈奖励。(笑声)如果你看到有人在背景里跳起来,那可能就是我——因为看到老鼠选择快乐或乐趣而非效率,我欣喜若狂。(笑声和掌声)我教会了老鼠开车,但它们教会了我享受过程。谢谢大家。(掌声)
Original English
So what are we finding? The results are still rolling in, but we're starting to see some trends. If we expose these rats to a rat-optimism task, and yes, there is such a thing, we've seen that the males shift from a pessimistic strategy to an optimistic strategy. But we don't see that with the females. They remain more reality-based in both groups. (Laughter) Now I should mention that the control group for this bit of research is a group that receives all the good things at once, so they don’t have that anticipation period there. So we’re not sure if that generalizes to humans, about the females, but we need to pursue that further. But the other results we see both in males and females, and it is important to look at sex differences when we’re doing this research, so both males and females show increased and intense exploration, as if they think they’re going to find something good, when they're exploring a novel environment. So we're very encouraged by these results. And surprisingly, one day, a student ran into my office and said, "Doctor Lambert, why are the UPER-trained rats' tails sticking straight up?" I thought, I've been working with rats for over three decades, and I've never seen this or heard of it. But I went to the literature, and I saw that some researchers would inject an opioid into the animals, and their tails would go up. And I thought, oh my goodness, maybe we're doing something with behaviorceuticals that has been done with pharmaceuticals. So this is something that we need to explore further. This research made me think about some classic research conducted in the 1950s by Curt Richter at Johns Hopkins University. He was interested in swim behavior between lab rats and wild rats, and he had some interesting laboratory conditions for this. But in the swim tank, it was turbulent water, so it was challenging. And he saw that the lab rats could swim for hours or days. They're great swimmers. But the wild rats, when he trapped them, brought them in and put them in the tank, they sank immediately, dying. And he was shocked by this because it's tough living out there in the wild, and he'd thought those wild rats would be more resilient. He said it looked like they were just giving up. But when he thought about the experiences of the lab rats and the wild rats, he realized that those lab rats had been periodically picked up by human hands, and their conditions had changed. So there was some hope that if you didn't like what was going on now, it could change. But the wild rats hadn't had that experience. So he devised this intervention where his assistants would pick up the wild rats from the restraining cage or from the water just once or twice. And he ran the study again. And he found that a majority of those wild rats at that time, they went from dying to surviving. And he said it was the hope of rescue that led them down that path. It makes you think: is this important for humans? There is a good bit of research to suggest that hope and positive attitudes are important for health and longevity. One of my favorite studies was conducted on Israeli children who were very ill, and they were part of the Make-A-Wish Foundation program, and the researchers monitored their general physical health and mental health outcomes from the time they were told specifically what their wish was to the time the wish was granted. And that was about five months, so they could extend that anticipatory time. And they found that these outcomes improved, to suggest that maybe their quality of life during that time was enhanced. And when they compared it to the children who were in the queue to get a wish, but they hadn't been told the specifics, so they really couldn't wish specifically and hope specifically for that to happen. Hopefully, when those children received the details of their wish, they also benefited from this. So there's a lot of research to suggest that, yes, those negative emotions are important to understand, but these positive emotions are as well. And when we step back and look at the brain and everything that's going on during positive anticipation and joy, you can see that there are a lot of different areas of the brain that are on board or activated during this time. Areas involved with processing reward and monitoring internal feelings and planning and movement are all activated during this time of joy and positive anticipation. So with all of this evidence, behavioral, anecdotal, neurological, suggesting that positive emotions are important, this isn't always reflected in our culture. It's really interesting to me that we have a word for anticipating something negative, it’s dread. But to my knowledge, I don't know that we have a word related to anticipating something positive. But in the German language they do. It's "vorfreude." It means joyful anticipation. Perhaps it's time for us to step up and come up with our own word for joyful anticipation. And personally, I find myself going back to this Puritan work ethic too often where we equate busyness and hard work with virtue. And if I find an hour or two to watch Netflix or something I enjoy, I often describe it as a "guilty pleasure." But why does it have to be a guilty pleasure? Far from an indulgence, it's looking like these pleasure and positive events are important and critical for healthy maintenance of our brains. Let me end by going back to those driving rants. A lot of people ask me, "Kelly, do they like to drive? Do they enjoy driving?" And my response has typically been, "I can't give them a questionnaire, I don't really know, I think they do." But we could ask them from a behavioral perspective. And that's what we did recently. We gave them a choice of walking to the Froot Loop tree, that's what they drive to, in a more efficient path, or they could take a detour and backtrack and jump in the car and drive to the rewards. And I couldn't wait to see what they would do. And what we found was a majority of the animals did indeed backtrack, take a tour and jump into the car and drive to their Froot Loop rewards. (Laughter) And if you saw a human, jumping in the background, that was me, jumping for joy seeing rats choose pleasure or fun over efficiency. (Laughter and applause) I taught rats to drive cars, but they taught me to enjoy the ride. Thank you. (Applause)
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
媒体/书籍: Lifting Depression