AI泡沫内爆风险与中期选举前瞻 Joseph Wang 2026-10-31

AI泡沫内爆风险与中期选举前瞻

关键字 asset-pricing tech-bubble election-impact macro-investing
7 节

市场回顾与AI泡沫论断

[笑声]

朋友们好,欢迎收看本期非常特别的《Markets Weekly》。

英文原文 [laughter]

Hello my friends and welcome to a very very special episode of Markets Weekly.

[笑声]

英文原文 >> [laughter]

好的各位,万圣节快乐。上周市场经历了一个惊悚之夜,尤其是周五纳斯达克指数下跌超过4%。

因此很多人都在想:一切都结束了吗?泡沫正在内爆吗?首先,我们来谈谈为什么我认为泡沫正在破裂,尽管我认为这会是一个持续数月的过程。

其次,让我们向前看,因为下周有几个非常重大的催化事件即将发生:美国中期选举,以及针对伊朗的潜在打击。让我们思考一下中期选举后续将如何塑造资产价格。

英文原文 >> All right guys, happy Halloween and last week was a spooky week in markets, especially Friday when we had the Nasdaq down over 4%.

So, many people are wondering is it over? Is the bubble imploding? So, first off, let's talk about why I think the bubble is imploding, although it was something that I think will happen over a period of time, say several months.

And secondly, let's look ahead because we have some big big catalysts coming up next week. We got the US midterm election and potential strikes on Iran and let's think about how how midterm elections could shape asset prices going forward.

从边缘云到科技巨头的AI交易退潮

好的,先从AI交易说起。正如我们过去两周讨论的那样,我们看到AI交易正在逐步由外向内崩溃。几周前,AI交易中最外围的部分——新型云服务商(neo clouds)——正在内爆。新型云服务商基本上属于投机性企业,就我听到的情况来看,这帮人很多时候管理得不如超大规模云服务商(hyperscalers)。他们四处借入数百亿美元去建设数据中心,然后将算力出租出去。

这是一种投机性商业模式,因为你根本无法确切知晓几年后算力的价格会是多少。你借了一大笔钱去建一个将存在好几年的数据中心,却并不真正知道它能带来多少回报。所以这是一场投机性赌博。几周前,我们看到这些新型云服务商的股价暴跌,融资利率飙升,而且据我所知,埃隆(Elon)似乎也对新型云生态系统表达了否定态度。当然,部分原因是更高的利率,而且相信沃斯(worth)会赞同将其称为“金融条件的收紧”,但总体而言,市场对AI交易的这一角落只是变得更加怀疑和担忧。这确实是AI生态系统中投机性最强的部分。

英文原文 All right, starting with the AI trade.

So, as we've been discussing actually for the past 2 weeks, we've seen the AI trade gradually implode from the outside in. A couple weeks ago, the most peripheral part of the AI trade, the neo clouds, were imploding. So, neo clouds are are basically speculative businesses bunch of these guys often times from what I hear are not as well run as the hyperscalers go out and borrow tens of billions of dollars and go and build data centers and then lease out compute.

Now, this is a speculative business model because you don't really know what the price of compute will be in a few years. So, you have this huge huge huge you bought a whole bunch of money to build a data center that's going to be around for a few years, but you don't really know what your return is going to be for it. So, it is a speculative endeavor. And now, a couple weeks ago, we saw the stocks of these neo clouds tank. We saw their financing rates surge and we saw Elon, I guess, go and uh kind of give the thumbs down on the Neo Cloud ecosystem. Now, part of this, of course, is higher interest rates, and sure worth would approve calling it tightening financial conditions, but overall, the the the market is just a lot more skeptical and concerned about this corner of the AI trade. Again, that is the most speculative part of the AI ecosystem.

然而上周,我们迎来了Meta的财报。Meta业绩很好,公司盈利丰厚,并在持续进行资本支出(CapEx),但市场却对其进行了猛烈抨击,财报后股价跌了7%。从那时起你就能察觉出基调可能发生了变化。而刚过去的这一周,我们看到了更多美股七巨头(Mac 7)的财报,现在我们可以非常笃定地看出,市场的思考方式发生了转变。我们看到谷歌发布财报,一切都很正常,资本支出依然坚挺,结果股价暴跌13%。接着是亚马逊,同样一切看似良好,股价下跌6%。微软的情况则是看似一切正常,股价先涨了几个百分点,次日同样转为下跌。这是一个非常重大的转变。

退一步来看,这些七巨头企业继续在AI基础设施建设上投入数千亿美元,他们耗尽了全部自由现金流,如今自由现金流已转为负值,并且正通过借债来维持这种开支。在过去,市场对此会拍手称赞——参与AI是一件大好事;但如今情况变了,市场显然对这些融资项目的可行性产生了更深的怀疑。

英文原文 Last week though, we got Meta reporting, and Meta reported great great company making a lot of money, spending on CapEx, and the market just panned them, like down 7% after earnings. That is when you can see that there is probably a tone change. This past week, we had more Mac 7 reports, and now we can see pretty pretty sure pretty confidently that there is a shift in how the market is thinking. So, we had Google report, and everything's fine, CapEx still good. Tanked, right? Stock down 13%. Then we had Amazon, again, everything seems fine.

Stock down 6%. Microsoft, well everything seems fine, stock up a few percent, and the day afterwards, got it also down. So, that's a big big big shift. Now, let's taking a step back, these Mac 7 companies continue to spend several hundred billion dollars in their AI buildout, and they've spent all their free cash flow, their free cash flow negative now, and they're borrowing money to do this. In the past, the market would have applauded this, right? Participating in AI, all great, but now now things are different, and the market is definitely becoming more skeptical about the viability of these financing projects.

上周,我们还看到了Anthropic的S-1文件,获取了关于其IPO进展的更多信息。对此各方观点分歧很大。我认为更理性的人在审视这份文件时会发现:虽然正如支持者所言,营收增速惊人,甚至按某些指标看可能已有盈利,但也有不少说法表明,在过去两个月(即第三季度之后),其营收增长出现了明显停滞。显而易见,这帮人正筹划上市,自然会尽力展示最好的一面。然而多处信源表明其营收增长实际上已经走平。对于一家承担着数千亿美元算力采购承诺的公司而言,一旦营收无法增长,就会陷入亏损。因此这对他们来说是个严重的问题。

当然,他们依然很有价值,但你不得不怀疑:它到底值2万亿美元,还是1.5万亿美元?归根结底,这是一场高度投机的尝试。我认为这引发了市场上部分投资者的担忧。

英文原文 Last week, we also had S1, the S1 of Anthropic, more information about this how the IPO would go. So you have a wide range of viewpoints on this. I think the smarter people will look at this and say that, wait a minute, you have massive revenue growth, yes, as fans would say, a huge revenue growth, and by some measures, you know, maybe even profitable.

But there are also many accounts that over the past 2 months, that is to say, after the third quarter, uh the revenue growth has stalled significantly in Athlon Optics. So, obviously, these guys are trying to IPO. They're going to put their best foot forward. But, there are many accounts that suggest that revenue growth have has actually flatlined. And for a company that has hundreds of billions of dollars in commitments to buy compute, if your revenue is not growing, you are going to be losing money. So, that is a big problem for them.

Sure, they're still valuable, but, you know, you have to wonder, is it 2 trillion? Is it 1.5? At the end of the day, it's going to It's a very speculative endeavor. So, I think that created concern among some people in the market.

AI颠覆现有企业与自身护城河

以上全是融资可行性层面的问题。我认为导致科技股抛售的背后,还有与AI相关的更根本性原因:我们开始看到AI正在对现有商业产生颠覆。

这种颠覆对消费者而言当然是好事,但对在位企业(incumbents)却并非利好。例如,投资者对谷歌财报不满意的一点,在于其核心业务——搜索业务——的增长似乎正在放缓。谷歌本质上是一家广告公司,对吧?你在谷歌中进行搜索,它向你展示广告赞助链接;如果你点击链接,他们就能获得收入。谷歌就是这样赚钱的。互联网是一个巨大无比的数据库,谷歌通过帮助你找到所需内容来组织这个数据库。

然而,如果现在有了在同一个海量数据库上训练出来的AI,AI也能直接为你提供答案。因此越来越多的人(包括我自己)在想了解某件事时,直接向AI提问,由AI梳理好结果,而不再需要去使用谷歌搜索。这个AI可以是Gemini、OpenAI、Claude,也可以是Grok。但归根结底,这正在蚕食谷歌搜索的部分业务,未来这将成为谷歌面临的根本性挑战。不仅如此,试想一下AI智能体(agents)的兴起,比如Meta推出的Muse,这可能会让亚马逊等平台上的购物比价变得更加充分。也许你的AI智能体就会拿亚马逊上的商品去和沃尔玛等平台进行对比。因此,这些技术固然会让消费者受益,但也会通过加剧竞争来颠覆既有巨头。你会逐渐看到这一趋势。当然,那些利润最丰厚、护城河最深的企业——也就是“美股七巨头”——看起来也将不得不面临自我颠覆。

英文原文 So, that's all the financing viability side. I think there are also more fundamental reasons why the I think that we have this tech sell-off and is also related to AI. And that is to say, and that is that we're beginning to see AI disrupt businesses.

Now, disruption, of course, is good for the consumer, but not so good for the incumbent. So, one of the things that uh investors did not like about Google earnings is that it seems like Google's core business, its search business, it's decelerating in growth. So, Google is basically an advertisement company, right? So, you search in Google and it shows you advertisement sponsored links. And if you click it, they get paid. So, that's how That's how Google makes its money. So, the internet is a ginormous ginormous database. Google helps you organize that database by helping you find what you're looking for.

But, if you have AI now, which trained on that same monstrous database, the AI can also provide you answers as well. So, more and more people, and I do this myself, when they want to know something, they just ask the AI and the AI will organize it for them. They don't need to go to Google search. Now, the AI could be Gemini, it could be Open AI, it could be Claude, it would be Grok. But, at the end of the day, that is cannibalizing some of Google Search's business. And that that's going to be a fundamental problem for Google going forward. And not just that, if you think about the rise of AI agents, Muse for example, by Meta, maybe that's going to make shopping on platforms like Amazon more competitive. Maybe your AI agent will compare what's on Amazon with, you know, Walmart and whatnot. And so, these technologies are going to benefit the consumer, but they are going to be disruptive for the incumbents through competition. And so, you're going to see that a little bit. And of course, some of the most profitable companies with the biggest moats, these are the Magnificent Seven companies, and it looks like they're going to be disrupting themselves.

因此,有充分的理由认为AI交易已经见顶。我认为顶部已经确立,但这并不意味着我们会立刻崩盘。正如我多次提到的,我认为这实际上会是一个漫长、缓慢且痛苦的磨人熊市。纳斯达克指数似乎刚好触及200日均线并出现反弹。这会是一个过程。就像凯文·缪尔(Kevin Muir)有一次在他的节目中谈到互联网泡沫时说的那样:在繁荣期,很多人因为做空而破产;几年后,更多的人却因为逢低买入而倾家荡产。一路上会有许多人不断抄底。我不认为会出现互联网泡沫时期那样90%的惨烈崩盘,因为从基本面来看,其中许多企业都是非常优秀的公司;但回调20%到30%,我认为是完全合情合理的。

英文原文 So, there's a lot of reasons to see that the AI trade top, I think the top is in, but that doesn't mean that we'll implode. This could I I actually, like I've said many times, I think that this is a long, slow, grinding bear market. Nasdaq looks like it was just above its 200-day moving average and it bounced.

You know, it's going to be a process. It's going to be a process. As I believe Kevin Muir said this on his show once during the dot-com boom, many people went broke selling it. A few years later, even more people went broke buying it. There will be many people who buy it all the way down. Now, I don't think we're going to have this 90% implosion like we did in the dot-com because fundamentally many of these businesses are are very good businesses. Uh but, you know, 20-30% that would be, I think, totally reasonable.

网络安全威胁与加密货币冲击

我还要指出AI对市场造成干扰的另一面:它正让网络安全问题愈发引人担忧。在刚过去的这一周,主流加密货币交易所币安(Binance)遭遇黑客攻击。有报道指出攻击者来自朝鲜,他们很可能借助了AI工具,盗走了数十亿美元。这沉重打击了加密货币市场的信心,比特币大幅下挫。同样,加密货币和纳斯达克指数都属于风险偏好驱动的动量交易,彼此高度关联。从根本机制来看,这当然是AI带来实质破坏的又一种表现。因此,务必确保你的资产安全。我们持有的大多数资产本质上只是数据库里的一个数字,无论是银行账户还是证券账户皆是如此。请确保做好完备的安全防护,开启双重验证(2FA)等措施,并确认资金存放在具备强大网络安全防护能力的机构中。

英文原文 Now, I would also point out another thing that AI is disrupting uh markets. And that is that it's making cybersecurity more of a concern. So, this past week we had Binance, a major crypto exchange, hacked. Reports suggest it was by North Korea, and they probably had the help of AI and a few billion were stolen. That really hurt sentiment in crypto. Bitcoin was down a lot. Again, crypto, Nasdaq, these are all kind of tied together as a risk-on momentum trades. And that is, of course, another way that AI, as from fundamental way, is actually disrupting. So, I would actually be make sure that you have your So, most of what we own is just a number in a database, right? Your bank account, your brokerage account, so forth. Make sure it's Make sure you have good security, fact, two-factor, and all that. Make sure it's with an institution that has strong cybersecurity capabilities.

美债与黄金走势

审视其他资产,我们看到避险买盘推动债券受到追捧,10年期美债收益率下降了几个基点,落至5%下方。此前那些大肆宣扬财政赤字将推高收益率的人,如今声音不再那么响亮了。利率本质上反映的是对政策路径的预期;如果风险资产出现缩水,就会产生负财富效应,这可能会使美国经济陷入衰退。在这种情况下,美联储的加息次数将会减少,最终走向降息,而这都会在收益率曲线上体现出来。

我还认为,近期黄金的大幅下挫也非常值得关注。黄金很久以前就跌破了所有均线支撑,如今更是失守了4000美元大关。因此我预计,在市场开始对降息进行定价之前,黄金的交易表现将持续疲软。而降息预期的出现,可能还需要几周或几个月的时间,这在很大程度上取决于股票市场的走势。

如果股票市场出现大幅下跌,市场就会开始消化降息预期,根据局势发展,最早甚至可能在12月发生。我认为股票市场的走向,虽然AI交易自身的内爆已清晰可见,但也可能因下周发生的事件而进一步加速。

英文原文 Looking at other assets, we saw bonds get a bid flight to safety, 10-year down a few basis points below 5%. Um all those guys who are crying about the deficit blowing out yields, they're not so loud anymore. Again, rates are the expected path of policy, and if you were to have a deflation in risk assets, that's a negative wealth effect, that probably puts the US in a recession, and in that case, there'll be fewer hikes, and eventually there will be cuts, and that uh will show up in the yield curve.

I also thought it was very interesting to see gold basically implode as well. Big lately. Now, gold lost all its moving averages long ago, and now has lost the $4,000 mark. So, I I I I would expect it to continue to trade very poorly until the market is at a time where it begins to price in rate cuts, and that could be um you know, that could be in a few weeks, could be in a few months. It really I think depends on how the equity market performs.

If we have a significant decline in the equity markets, the market will begin to price in cuts, maybe as soon as December, depending on what happens. And I think a lot of what happens to the equity markets, again, not We see the AI trade imploding on its own, but it could accelerate with what happens next week.

中期选举预期与政策演变

下周我们将迎来两项重大事件。首先,总统承诺将对伊朗实施更多打击。我不知道他是否真会采取行动,但许多重量级人士认为这是极可能发生的结果。具体如何我们拭目以待,如果他真的实施打击,显然并非利好。

其次,更为具象且切实的影响来自中期选举。大家知道我一直密切跟踪美国政治,我认为市场始终是政治的下游产物。国会、行政部门和央行的举措,在我看来远比某家公司的财报数字重要得多。贸易政策、税收政策、利率政策、财政支出——这些才是过去几年真正驱动市场的力量。

目前博彩市场的赔率显示,民主党横扫两院的概率达到70%。我个人认为民主党确实会迎来全面胜利,并形成一股巨大的浪潮,这将对后续局势产生深远影响。你大可不必迷信民调数据,但看看总统的动向便知:他这个周末就在堪萨斯州,而堪萨斯州是一个极度深红的保守州。但现实情况是,这些农业州正遭受关税的沉重打击。关税提高,中国随即反制,减少采购美国农产品;再加上伊朗冲突导致柴油价格攀升,农民面临严重的成本挤压。这些全都是总统本人推行的政策所致,他无法推诿责任,且正在付出极其沉重的选票代价。

英文原文 So, next week we have a couple big events. First off, the president has promised more strikes on Iran. I don't know if he'll do that. Um but there's a lot of important people who think that it's a likely uh it's a pretty likely outcome. I don't know, but we'll we'll find out. If he does, obviously that's not good. Uh but secondly, with something that is more tangible, I think, is the midterm elections. So, I follow US politics super closely as you guys know. I think that markets are downstream from politics. So, what they what the Congress does, the executive does, central bank does to me is much more important than earnings this earnings that, right? I mean, trade policy, tax policy, interest rate policy, fiscal spending. These are all the things that have actually driven the markets for the past few years.

So, at the moment, uh the betting odds betting markets are saying that there's a 70% chance of a Democratic sweep. I personally think that we will get a Democratic sweep and it will be a huge huge tidal wave. And that uh and that's going to have implications as to what happens. So, if you Okay, so I mean, you don't have to believe polling data, but you can just look at the president. He is in Kansas this weekend, right? Kansas. Kansas is a very very red state. Uh but what's happening is that So, these are also farming states. So, the farmers are getting hit from tariffs. Again, tariffs up, China retaliates. Now, they don't want to buy as many US agriculture goods. And of course, Iran war, diesel prices up, they're getting squeezed on costs. So, this uh all these things are actually policies that the president himself put on. So, he kind of doesn't have anyone to blame, but he is really paying a very steep electoral price.

假如这种全面大胜成为现实,民主党打算做些什么?他们实际上已经表明了意图。大家普遍意识到,生活成本与负担能力(affordability)是公众最核心的政治关切。因此他们的方案首先是力图取消关税,并设法终结在伊朗的战事。理论上,国会可以通过立法收回或限制总统的关税征收权限,也可以立法切断对伊朗战争的拨款。我不知道他们是否掌握足够的票数来落实这些,但如果一个主要政党、一个重要政府部门朝这个方向推动,确实会带来改观。

此外,他们一直在讨论的另一件事是对数据中心的抱怨。在美国,数据中心并不受民众欢迎,大家往往将其视为推高电价、制造噪音并可能抢走工作岗位的机器。不仅在纽约等蓝州对数据中心建设出台了禁令,得克萨斯等红州同样如此。这是一个非常具有广泛群众基础的民生议题。我不确定民主党控制的国会能否在此有多大作为,毕竟很多属于地方事务,但确实有一个主要政党正在发出类似的呼声。

回想一下美联储加息的初衷:其一在于关税,其二在于AI建设,其三在于能源成本。如果民主党大获全胜,这三项因素都将转向退潮。因此我认为这对债券市场将非常有利,利率有望下行。

英文原文 So, should this huge sweep happen, what do the Democrats want to do? Now, they they're already telling you what they want to do. It's um So, basically, for people everyone has realized that affordability is the key political issue of the public. So, their plan, of course, is again to try to get rid of tariffs and try to get end the war in Iran. Now, again, in theory, Congress could pass legislation that takes back the president's tariff authority or curtail it. In theory, they could pass legislation that defunds the Iran war. I don't know if they'll have the numbers to do it, but if you have a major political party, if you have a major branch of government pushing towards that, I think it does make a difference.

So, if you do have Okay, and that's something else they've been talking about, of course, is complaining about, you know, data centers. Now, in the US, data centers are not popular. These people look at these things as, you know, noisy machines that drive up electricity costs and probably are going to take your jobs. So, they're not popular.

And, you know, in some states, not just say blue states, in New York, there's a moratorium on data center construction, but also red states like Texas. So, this is a very much a popular issue. I don't know if the Democrats a Democratic Congress can do much about it. A lot of this is local, but, you know, again, you have a major political party making noises to that extent.

Now, think back to why the Fed is hiking rates. One, tariffs. Two, AI build-out. Three, energy costs, right? These three things are going to be heading towards a different like retreating. I should we have a Democratic sweep. So, I think that this will be very good for bonds, right? So, interest rates lower.

财政、税收与政治博弈前景

民主党还提到了扩大支出,比如免费联邦医疗保险(Medicare)和其他福利开支,这些主张深受欢迎。但在全美范围内,民主党政策纲领的另一个组成部分是提高税收——不一定是财富税,但本质上是向富人征税。因此他们很可能会扩大财政支出。最终具体结果取决于其优势席位规模,以及总统是否会行使否决权;但扩大支出伴随加税,性质就完全不同了。加税举措预计会立刻导致消费支出疲软和企业利润下滑,因此对股票市场并不利好。

此外,根据特朗普1.0时期的经验,届时必将出现大量的国会调查。坦率地说,确实存在大量值得调查的事情。例如新出版的书中提到总统的女婿贾里德·库什纳(Jared Kushner)大肆敛财;不仅是他,总统家族已经赚取了数十亿美元。在美国历史上,从来没有人像特朗普家族这样将总统职位变现。民主党必定会对此展开调查,伴随而来的将是激烈的对抗与纷争。我认为这也将严重挫伤市场情绪。

加之上述诸多政策不确定性,势必会对商业投资和消费者信心产生抑制。因此在我看来,我们很可能会步入一种衰退氛围之中:风险资产表现低迷,而债券市场将表现更好。

别忘了,周二选举一过,所有人的目光都将转向2020年总统大选(此处为原讲话表述)。一方希望经济垮掉,而总统则希望提振经济,以便让他的继任者(无论会是谁)在竞选时有所依仗。无论如何,前景看似不容乐观。

我们周二就能见分晓。另外从历史经验来看,政府陷入僵局对市场往往是利好的;但当前我们处于极度极化的时代,僵局是否还能带来利好仍未可知,几天后便有答案。

英文原文 Now, they also talk about you know, spending stuff, you know, free Medicare, free stuff, right? That's that's popular. Um, but something else about the Democratic platforms throughout the US is higher taxes. It doesn't have to be a wealth tax. It basically tax the rich, right? So, they're going to probably spend more money.

It all depends on how much how big a lead it is, whether or not the president will veto their actions, but spending more money combined with higher taxes, that's that's a different thing now. And, if you raise taxes though, I think right off the bat, you're going to have, you know, weaker consumer spending and lower corporate profits. So, it's probably not that good for for for the equity markets. Now, in addition, we also know through Trump 1.0 that there's going to be a lot of investigations. And to be clear, there is a lot to investigate, right? So, there's this new book out, for example, Jared Kushner, President's son-in-law, just just going out, just kind of just raking in the cash. Not just him, but of course the President's family has has made billions of dollars, right? No one has monetized the presidency like the Trump family in the history of the United States. So, the Democrats will be investigating that. There will be a lot of acrimony. It will be a whole mess. And I think that's going to impact sentiment as well.

In addition, you know, if you have all this policy uncertainty, that's going to be chilling business investment, consumer sentiment, and all that. So, it looks to me like we will probably be in a recessionary climate, whereas risk assets will perform poorly, bond market will perform better.

And rem- recall, right after Tuesday, everyone is going to be thinking about 2020 presidential elections. One party will want to tank the economy. And uh you know, and the President will will try to want to uh get the economy good so that his successor, whoever it may be, will have something to run on. But So, anyway, it looks like it's not going to be good.

Um but we'll find out on Tuesday. I will also note that historically speaking, uh I government with gridlock is good for the markets. But we are also at a time where I think there's just so much polarization. I don't know if it will be good. But we'll find out in a few days.

好的。还有一件事,当然就是针对伊朗实施打击的可能性,这不仅可能发生在中期选举之后,甚至可能在选举之前。

我个人的观点是,我认为这不会发生。原因在于总统过去曾拥有大量实施打击的机会,但他每一次都选择了放弃。因此看起来他并不想这么做,我认为他不会动手。但如果他确实发动了打击,局面将变得极其混乱。从伊朗方面释放的信号来看,他们显然已为此做好了准备,届时必将引发猛烈的报复,油价也将大幅飙升——这又是预示未来数月经济面临困难的另一层理由。好的,以上就是我今天准备的所有内容。非常感谢大家的收看,我们下周再聊。

英文原文 All right. One other thing, of course, is that um it's also possible that we could have strikes on by on Iran, not just after the midterm, but before.

Um so, my personal view is that I I don't think that will happen. Uh the reason being that the President has had so much opportunity to do this over the past. He just keeps turning it down all the time. So, it doesn't seem like he wants to and so I don't think he will. But if he does, it will be a huge mess. I do think that from everything the Iranians say that they have been preparing for this. It would just be huge retaliation. Oil prices will spike and that is again another reason to think that the economy will not be good in the coming months. All right, so that's all I prepared for today. Thanks so much for tuning in. Talk to you guys next week.