什么是文化战争?
吉尔伯特: 作为一名文化历史学家,我一直在试图弄清楚艺术作品与它们诞生背景之间的关系。你知道,这两者究竟是如何相互塑造的?我是吉尔伯特·克鲁兹(Gilbert Cruz)。这里是**《纽约时报》书评**(The New York Times Book Review)节目,今天我们要探讨的是“文化战争”。它们是什么?是如何开始的?谁一直站在前线?我们又抗争了多久?今天来到这里解答这些问题的是艾萨克·巴特勒(Isaac Butler)。他是一位文化历史学家、戏剧导演、教师和作家。他曾著有**《方法:20世纪如何学习表演》(The Method: How the 20th Century Learned to Act,对斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基表演体系的审视)以及《世界只管向前旋转》(The World Only Spins Forward,关于里程碑式戏剧《天使在美国》的宏大口述历史)。他的新书探讨了20世纪80年代和90年代美国文化战争的兴起。书名是《完美的时刻:上帝、性、艺术与美国文化战争的诞生》**(The Perfect Moment: God, Sex, Art, and the Birth of America's Culture Wars)。我就不用书名来开那个显而易见的双关玩笑了,但我们要说,现在似乎是讨论这一切的“完美时刻”。艾萨克,非常感谢你加入我们。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: The thing I'm always trying to figure out as a cultural historian is that relationship between the works of art and the context in which they are made. You know, how do those two things really shape each other? I'm Gilbert Cruz. This is the book review from the New York Times and today we're going to be talking about the culture wars. What are they? How did they start? Who has been on the front lines? And how long have we been fighting them? Here to answer those questions is Isaac Butler. He is a cultural historian, theater director, teacher, and author. He has written The Method: How the 20th Century Learned to Act, an examination of the Stannislovski Acting System and The World Only Spins Forward, a sweeping oral history about the landmark play Angels in America. His new book tackles the emergence of America's culture wars during the 1980s and 1990s. It is titled The Perfect Moment: God, Sex, Art, and the Birth of America's Culture Wars. And I will not use the title for the obvious pun here, but let's say it seems an appropriate moment to be talking about all of this. Isaac, thank you so much for joining us.
艾萨克: 非常感谢你邀请我,吉尔伯特。是的,对我们来说,这是一个非常“合适”的谈话时刻,或者说,一个能引起共鸣的时刻,不管怎么说。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Thank you so much for having me, Gilbert. Yes, a convenient moment uh for us to be talking. A I don't know, resonant moment, something.
吉尔伯特: 上帝、性、艺术。内容真多。你在这里试图解决很多问题。然而,美国文化战争的诞生显然是我们首先需要开始讨论的。“文化战争”这个词经常被使用。但在我们开始对话时,为了让我们达成共识,请给我一个简洁的定义,这在我们在整个对话中继续使用这个词时会很有用。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: God, sex, art. That's a lot. You're trying to tackle a lot here. The birth of America's culture wars, however, is the thing obviously we need to start with. This is a term culture wars that gets used a lot. Um, but right as we start this conversation, I would love so that we're all on the same page. Give me a succinct definition that is going to be useful as we continue to use this phrase over this entire conversation.
艾萨克: 当然可以。我会用一种简洁的方式来定义这个词:当文化创作本身——无论是艺术作品、电视节目、音乐专辑还是其他任何东西——变成政治议题时。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Sure. The the succinct way that I would use the phrase is when cultural creations, you know, works of art, TV shows, albums, what what have you, become political issues in and of themselves.
艾萨克: 嗯,我书中所写时代的一个非常明确的例子是(像我这样的中年人可能还记忆犹新)2 Live Crew的专辑**《要多下流有多下流》**(As Nasty as They Want to Be),对吧?它最终成了淫秽案审判等各种事件的焦点。但甚至在此之前,这就已经是政治家们辩论的议题了。比如,“我们该拿这个怎么办?这应该合法吗?”因此,存在着这类斗争。而且因为美国没有像法国那样固定的国家认同——在法国,字面意义上有一个由德高望重者组成的委员会来决定什么是法国的,什么不是。我们在美国没有这个。文化战争会随时爆发,因为艺术是我们决定“我们是谁”的方式。这是探索和发展一个国家或一个人的灵魂的领域。所以美国特别容易发生文化战争。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Um, a very clear example from the era of my book that, you know, middle-aged people like me will remember very well is the two live crew album, As Nasty as They Want to Be, right? which was eventually the subject of an obscenity trial and all sorts of things. But even before that, this is a thing that's being debated by politicians. You know, what are we going to do about this? Should this be legal? You know, so there there are those kinds of fights and because America does not have a fixed national identity in the way that like France does, right? Where there's like literally a board of venerable people who decide what is French and what is not. We don't have that in the United States. Culture wars are going to flare up all the time because you know the arts are how we decide who we are. It's it's it's that's the terrain in which you know the soul of a nation or or of a person is really explored and developed. So America is particularly prone to them.
吉尔伯特: 所以它必须与一件艺术作品或一件作品联系在一起?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: So it has to be attached to a work of art or piece of
艾萨克: 我认为是这样,没错。
Original English
Isaac Butler: I believe. So yes.
为何此时涉足这一话题?
吉尔伯特: 那么为什么是现在呢?你看,你写过两本关于戏剧的书,现在你主要涉足艺术界,涉足不同类型的艺术——摄影、行为艺术以及其他一些东西。但在这个时刻,是什么让你觉得:“好吧,尽管这可能会带来压力,但我接下来必须涉足这件事”?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: So why now? You know, you wrote two books about theater and now you're you're dipping into into the world largely of art and different types of art, photography, performance art, a little bit of other stuff. But what was it about this moment that you said, "Well, I guess as stressful as it may be, this is the thing I have to dip into next."
艾萨克: 是的,这确实很有压力,老实说。但这个故事从我上高中起就是我生活的一部分,因为我在华盛顿特区长大,事实上,我在书里客串了几次,讲述了度过那段时期的感受。我母亲当时非常活跃于特区的艺术界,我也是。我当时是特区的一名童星专业演员。所以,感觉我成长过程中经历的80年代和90年代的文化战争正在重演,有许多相同的力量,有时是相同的人,犯着相同的错误。因此,我真的很想讲述那个时代本身的故事,因为我认为这是一个重要的故事。而且,我认为那个故事对今天有着难以置信的启示意义。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Yeah. And and it was stressful. I'll be I'll be honest. But um this was a story that had been sort of part of my life ever since I was in high school because I grew up in Washington DC and in fact I make a couple cameo appearances in the book just talking about what it was like to live through this time. My mother was very involved in the arts in DC at the time and so was I. I was a child professional actor in DC. And so it really felt like the culture wars of the 80s and 90s that I grew up in were repeating again with many of the same forces, sometimes the same people, the same mistakes being made. And so I really wanted to tell the story of this time for its own sake because I think it's an important story. And then I also think that story has incredible resonance for today.
70年代的教科书战争
吉尔伯特: 在书中,你追溯得更早了一些。你在70年代确定了一个特定的时刻,也就是在此之前——
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: In the book you you go back a bit. You identify a specific moment in the 70s before
艾萨克: ——那奠定了基础,更具体地说,是一套战术手段。是的。
Original English
Isaac Butler: that laid the foundation but more specifically a playbook. Yes.
吉尔伯特: 用于随后发生的文化战争。你能简要谈谈那是什么,以及后来应用到其他争议中的要素有哪些吗?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: For the cultural wars that were to follow. Can you sort of touch on on what that was and what are the elements that were then later applied to other controversies?
艾萨克: 是的。所以,这是件非常疯狂的事,通常被称为卡诺瓦县教科书战争(Kanawha County textbook war),听起来像是一部肯·伯恩斯(Ken Burns)的纪录片。你知道,它感觉就像——
Original English
Isaac Butler: Yeah. So, it'\s this really wild thing called often called the Kawa County textbook war, which makes it sound like a Ken Burns documentary. You know, it's like
吉尔伯特: 那应该写成一出戏。应该有人用这个写一出戏。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: that should be a play. Someone should write a play with that.
艾萨克: “亲爱的玛莎,今天我要去参加教科书战争了。”你知道,它有点那种感觉。基本上,发生的事情在今天的人们听起来会非常熟悉,对吧?也就是一个学校董事会准备批准一套新课程,包括数以百计的书籍和成千上万件教学材料。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Dear Martha, today I go to fight in the textbook wars. You know, it sort of has that that feeling in it. Basically, what happened and this will sound very familiar to people today, right? Is that a school board was going to approve a new curriculum. So, you know, hundreds of books, thousands of pieces of educational material.
吉尔伯特: 顺便问一下,这是在哪个州?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: And what state was this in, by the way?
艾萨克: 西弗吉尼亚州。在西弗吉尼亚州的卡诺瓦县,为了使该县的课程符合州政府的规定,该规定要求“嘿,你们必须使课程多样化”。基本上就是这样,对吧?也就是说,迎合学生的需求,帮助他们用自己生活中的材料与故事联系起来。学校董事会中有一位成员是福音派基督徒,是一位牧师(前牧师)的妻子,她是在反对性教育的平台上竞选成功的。她领导了这场反对采用该课程的斗争,我想甚至她自己也会说这场斗争迅速失去了控制。对吧?所以,刚开始时只是“嘿,让我们推迟这批书”。然而,几个月后,成千上万的矿工进行非官方罢工,该县的每家杂货店都关闭了,有人朝汽车开枪,甚至学校被炸毁。我是说,这真的失去了控制。这本身就是一个极其迷人的故事。我之所以对此感兴趣,是因为它把后来在书中出现的多方势力聚集在了一起。各种福音派领袖、当时还是一家新机构的传统基金会(Heritage Foundation)也派人去帮忙。这就形成了一套策略包(Playbook):利用从大部头作品中挑选出来的、有时甚至是完全断章取义的引言来煽动听众,炒作一种夸大的委屈感和被迫害感(而且往往来自其实很有权力的人),然后占领那些社会中本应做出这类决策的、理应是非党派的专家委员会,占领它们以便推进你的意识形态。你知道,类似的举动在特朗普第二任政府中确实达到了顶峰,我想这是显而易见的。而在左翼方面,我们经常尝试这种套路:“好吧,我们就满足他们一点点要求,然后他们就会退却了。”这是贯穿我整本书的故事中的一个不断重复的错误,也是在特朗普第二任政府中反复出现的错误,因为事实证明,当你这样做时,实际上是在让他们更有资本去要得更多。
Original English
Isaac Butler: West Virginia. In Canawa County, West Virginia to bring the county's curriculum in line with a state regulation that said, "Hey, you got to diversify your curriculum." Basically, right? You know, meeting the students where they are, helping them use the materials of their own life to connect to the the stories and whatnot. There was one member of the school board who was an evangelical Christian, the wife of a minister, a former minister, and she had gotten elected specifically on an anti-sexed platform, and she led this fight against adopting the curriculum that I think even she would say rapidly spun out of control. Right? So, it started with, hey, let's delay these books. And, you know, months later, thousands of minors are going on wildcat strikes. every grocery store in the county is closed down. People are shooting at cars. I mean, it really schools get bombed. I mean, it really spirals out of control. Um, and it's a fascinating, fascinating story in its own right. Why I was interested in it is it brings together a lot of the players that are going to show up later in the book. Um, various evangelical leaders, the Heritage Foundation goes down there, which is a new organization at this point, uh, to help out. And there is this playbook that has to do with using selective and sometimes completely dishonest quotations from larger works to inflame an audience, hyping up, I would say, exaggerated sense of grievance and persecution often from actually quite powerful people, you know, and then um capturing the supposedly mostly nonpartisan expert boards that are supposed to be making these kinds of decisions in our society, capturing them so that they can then advance your ideology. You know, it's moves like that which really find their apotheiois in the second Trump administration. I think that's pretty clear. And then on the left side, you know, we often try this playbook of like, well, let's just give them what a a little bit of what they want and then they'll go away. And that is a mistake that recurs throughout the story of my book and it's a mistake that's recurred throughout this second Trump administration because it turns out when you do that what you actually do is empower them to ask for more.
NEA与艺术基金会的黄金岁月
吉尔伯特: 你在书中确实深入探讨了在这场前奏发生之后的发展过程。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: You really dig deep on the way in which after this sort of precursor happens.
艾萨克: 是的。你知道,我们来到80年代末和90年代初,有一个组织在当时——我之前没有意识到这一点,当时它还相当年轻——成为了许多关于艺术、艺术资助以及使用纳税人资金是否合适的斗争的中心。那就是国家艺术基金会(National Endowment for the Arts, 简称 NEA)。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Yeah. you know, we go to the the late 80s and early 90s, and there's an organization that at the time, I didn't realize this, at the time was still fairly young, had become sort of the the the center of so many fights over arts and arts funding and the appropriateness of using taxpayer dollars for this and that. And that is the National Endowment for the Arts.
吉尔伯特: 跟我说说这个国家艺术基金会(NEA)吧。老实说,我一直以为它存在了很久。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Tell me about the NEA, which honestly I just I thought it had been around for so long.
艾萨克: 不,它成立于1965年。
Original English
Isaac Butler: No, it's only 1965.
吉尔伯特: 我之前没意识到。为什么呢?它是怎么开始的?又是因为什么原因,这个在我看来(至少在被描述时)相当不起眼的政府机构,突然之间变成了这一切的风暴中心?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: I had I didn't realize why. What was it? Why did it start? And then what was the reason that this fairly,
艾萨克: 那么,国家艺术基金会实际上是**“伟大社会”计划**(Great Society program)的一部分。它于1965年启动。这并非政府首次尝试资助艺术,但由于种种原因,他们试图采取不同的做法。我现在要说的是,我认为最初形式的国家艺术基金会——在它成立的前25年里——确实是联邦政府所能做的事情的典范。它的预算极小,但产生了极其深远的影响。这里面有部分原因是,在第二次世界大战之后,美国成为地球上的两个超级大国之一。他们有这样一种想法,就像你可以追溯到殖民时期、文艺复兴时期等等,每一个走上舞台并宣称“现在由我们主导”的国家,都会开始大规模投资艺术。他们这样做是为了帮助塑造国家认同。他们这样做是为了给后人、为历史书创造一些东西。他们这样做是作为一种生活方式的宣传或展示。我们当时也在做同样的事情,但重要的是,我们是在冷战的阴影下做这件事。苏联直接资助并直接控制其艺术家的表达。而我们想尽可能远离这种模式。我们开创了这种非常出色的模式,通常被称为“保持距离模式”(arms length model)或“放手模式”(hands-off model),即国家艺术基金会设立可以申请的类别,但它不选择胜出者。胜出者是由基金会组织的民间同行评审小组(civilian peer review panels)选出的,由这些小组做出决定。这些小组由不同的人组成,例如在视觉艺术领域,可能有一些策展人、一些同行艺术家、一位主要的出资人等。
Original English
Isaac Butler: you know, in my opinion at least seeing it described, you know, like pretty anodized governmental organization all of a sudden became the center, the hot center of all this. So the National Endowment for the Arts is really a great society program. It's launched in 1965. It's not the first time the government tries funding the arts, but they try to do it differently for a bunch of different reasons. And I will just say right now, I think the National Endowment for the Arts in its original form for those first uh 25 years is really the best of what the federal government can do. It had a tiny budget, but it it had an enormous enormous impact. So part of what's going on is after World War II, America is one of the two superpowers on earth. They have this idea as almost every, you know, if you even go back to the colonial period or the Renaissance or whatever, every country that's like steps up to the plate and is like we run the show now, they start massively investing in the arts. They do that to help create a national identity. They do that to create something for posterity, for the history books. They do that as kind of not propaganda but a sort of advertisement for their way of life, you know, etc., etc., and so forth. And we were doing the same thing, but importantly, we were doing the same thing in the shadow of the Cold War. So, the Soviets directly fund and directly control the expression of their artists. And we wanted to get as far away from that. And that we pioneered this model that's really brilliant that's often called the arms length model or the hands-off model which is that the NEA sets the categories of things that you can apply for but it does not choose the winners. The winners are chosen by civilian peerreview panels that the endowment organizes and those panels then make those choices. And those panels are made up, you know, in the visual arts it might be some curators, some fellow artists, a major funer, you know,
吉尔伯特: 当你提到胜出者时,你说的是获得资助资金。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: and when you say winners, you're saying grant money.
艾萨克: 资助资金。你赢得的资助虽然对个人来说可能相对较小,但对于一个正在开展工作的艺术家来说却意义重大。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Grant money. You're winning grants that can be
吉尔伯特: 没错。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Yep.
吉尔伯特: 虽然对作为一名职业艺术家的你来说相对较小,但意义重大。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: relatively small but big for you as a working artist.
艾萨克: 没错。国家艺术基金会确实帮助创造了20世纪的艺术。我们称之为艺术的“美国世纪”,这很大程度上要归功于国家艺术基金会。如果我手头有的话,我可以读出成百上千位他们资助过的视觉艺术家的名字。他们确实帮助创造了20世纪下半叶的全国舞蹈运动。如果没有国家艺术基金会,当今形式的地方剧院运动根本不会存在。交响乐团的数量指数级增长,等等。他们资助了许多传统项目,比如学校里的莎士比亚戏剧、民间艺术保护等等。但他们也资助了非常前沿的艺术家。而且,它是联邦政府中唯一一个有色人种和LGBTQ美国人都拥有权力基础的地方。你可以理解为什么这对右翼,尤其是基督教右翼来说是难以容忍的。因此,当政府资金开始流向让宗教右翼感到反感的艺术时,他们看到了在共和党内部攻击并建立权力的机会。接下来,艾萨克谈到了处于文化战争中心的艺术,以及这些非常公开的斗争对真实艺术家意味着什么。顺便说一下,艾萨克,你简要反映了一个事实,那就是在很长一段时间里,美国人有一种默契,认为艺术和政治或许是分开的,而正如你所说,定义了文化战争、定义了这一时期的事情之一就是这两者的激烈碰撞。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Correct. And the NEA really helps create the 20th century in art. Like we talk about it as the American century in art. And that is a lot of that's due to the NEA. I mean, if I had it handy, I could read the hundreds of visual artists they sponsored. They really helped create the national dance movement of the second half of the 20th century. The regional theater movement really wouldn't exist in its present form without the National Endowment for the Arts. number of symphony orchestras, you know, just like exponentially multiplies, etc. They are funding a lot of traditional stuff, Shakespeare and schools, folk art preservation, all that stuff. But they're also funding like really bleeding edge artists. Um, and it's really the only place in the federal government where both people of color and LGBTQ Americans have a power base. And you can see why that's anathema to the right and especially the Christian right. Um, and then when government money starts going to art that the religious right is offended by, they see an opening to attack and to build power within the Republican party. Coming up, Isaac talks about the art that was at the center of the culture wars and what these very public fights meant for the actual artists. So Isaac, you briefly reflect on the fact that for a very long time there was an implicit understanding in America that art and politics maybe were separate things and one of the things as you say that defined the culture wars that defined this period was the uh the smashing together of these two things.
视觉艺术的风暴中心
吉尔伯特: 是的。突然之间,文化成为政治辩论的中心焦点。你在书的开头谈到了围绕马丁·斯科塞斯(Martin Scorsese)的电影**《基督最后的诱惑》**(The Last Temptation of Christ)的争议。活动人士称其为亵渎神明,试图将其从电影院撤下。但随后,这一切转移到了美术界。是的。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Yes. All of a sudden, culture becomes a central focus in political debate. You start in the book by talking about the controversy around Martin Scorsesi's film, The Last Temptation of Christ. Activists are calling it blasphemous. They're trying to get it pulled from theaters. But then it all moves over into the world of fine art. Yes.
吉尔伯特: 行为艺术。而且直到读了你的书我才意识到,有那么多斗争是围绕摄影展开的。是的,有安德烈·塞拉诺(Andres Serrano),他因拍摄一张浸泡在自己尿液中的十字架而闻名。还有罗伯特·梅普尔索普(Robert Mapplethorpe),他拍摄了那些露骨的性图像。接着是大卫·沃纳罗维奇(David Wojnarowicz),他在一个保守宗教团体裁剪他的作品以使其看起来……之后提起了诉讼。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Performance art. And I didn't realize this until I read your book that so many of these fights were over photography. Yeah. There's Andre Serrano. He's famous for photographing a crucifix submerged in his own urine. There's Robert Maplethorp with his sexually explicit images. And then you had David Venerovich who actually sues after a conservative religious group crops his work to make it appear
吉尔伯特: 我想知道你能不能告诉我,像来自北卡罗来纳州的资深共和党参议员杰西·赫尔姆斯(Jesse Helms)以及所有反对资助这类艺术的组织,他们都采取了哪些策略?他们是如何动员支持者和其他人对他们不想在博物馆看到的东西感到愤怒的?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: I wonder if you could tell me what were some of the tactics that people like Jesse Helms, a longtime Republican senator from North Carolina
艾萨克: 所有的组织都在反对资助这种艺术,他们当时在做什么?他们如何动员他们的支持者和其他人对他们在博物馆不愿见到的事物感到愤怒?最大的讽刺之一是,他们采取的主要手段之一,居然是将这些图像分发给他们所有的追随者,以此来激怒他们,对吧?比如杰西·赫尔姆斯,还有一个叫唐纳德·怀尔德蒙(Donald Wildmon)的人,他管理着美国家庭协会(American Family Association)这个团体。你知道,他们是他们试图打击的那些图像的极其主要的传播媒介。有一些例子——
Original English
Isaac Butler: and all the organizations that were opposed to funding this kind of art, what what were they doing? How were they getting their supporters and other people riled up about what they didn't want in museums? Well, one of the great ironies is one of the main ways they were doing it was by distributing these images to all of their followers to piss them off, right? Like Jesse Helms and there's a guy named Donald Wildman who runs this group, the American Family Association. You know, they are unbelievably major distribution vectors of the very images that they're trying to fight. You know, there's a couple
吉尔伯特: 因为当时还没有互联网。如果你不亲自去博物馆,你就看不到这些画面。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: because the internet didn't exist. You couldn't see these images if you did not actually go to the museum.
艾萨克: 没错。我是说,我的书探讨的一大核心就是前互联网时代的政治组织,对吧?这真的非常引人入胜,因为右翼真正先驱性地发现、探索并创新,而左翼从未赶上的一大武器,就是直邮募捐信(direct mail appeals)。唐纳德·怀尔德蒙所做的是,他挑选出他能找到的最糟糕的例子,有时甚至捏造一些例子,然后复印这些材料装进信封寄出去。他们向人们承诺,如果不起身反抗,字面上有一封信写道:“对基督徒的肉体迫害就不远了。”
Original English
Isaac Butler: Yes. I mean, one of the things my book is really about is pre-in political organizing, right? And it's it's really fascinating because the the big thing that the right really pioneered, figured out, innovated on, and the the left never caught up to them was direct mail appeals. And what Donald Wildman is doing is he's taking the worst examples he can find and sometimes maybe making up some examples and he's, you know, xeroxing them and mimographing them and putting them in an envelope. And they promised people that if they didn't fight back against this, literally one of the letters says physical persecution of Christians won't be far behind.
NEA四人帮与寒蝉效应
吉尔伯特: 嗯。我很想知道,这些运动确实升级了。正如你在书中写了许多的那样,它们引发了国会的变化,甚至一路闹到了最高法院,当时一群后来被称为 “NEA四人帮”(NEA 4)的行为艺术家们的资助被否决,他们因此提起了诉讼。所以,对他们来说那是什么样的体验?对这些艺术家以及其他艺术家来说,情况是怎样的?这对他们的工作能力和名声有什么影响?对此存在一些争议,因为我们往往有一种假设,认为所有的媒体曝光都是好曝光,一旦你成为争议的焦点,对你的职业生涯就会有好处。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Mhm. Well, I'm curious. You know, these campaigns really escalate. They set off changes in Congress, as you write a bunch about, things go all the way to the Supreme Court when a group of performance artists that eventually become known as the NEA4, get their funding vetoed and they sue. So, just what was it like for them? What was it like for these artists, other artists? What's the effect on their ability to work, their reputations? You know, there's some debate about this because I think we have this assumption that all press is good press and once you're the subject of a controversy, it's good for your career.
艾萨克: 除了安德烈·塞拉诺之外,我交谈过的每个人都反驳了这一点。安德烈·塞拉诺绝对是这么想的,他说:“杰西·赫尔姆斯成就了我的职业生涯。我还在2000年给他写了一封感谢信,对吧?”你知道,他对这一点非常坦率。但如果你读过后来被称为“NEA四人帮”的四位行为艺术家的回忆录,他们会说:“我常去的艺术机构都不敢预订我的演出了,因为太危险了。他们不得不雇佣额外的安保人员。我收到了死亡威胁。你知道,没有人能单纯地看我的作品了。他们只是在寻找争议点。”这其中有许多痛苦。有许多与羞耻感的抗争,以及试图在自己的作品中重新找到自豪感。在面临这种时刻被围攻的压力下试图创作艺术,真的让人精疲力竭。在这期间,大卫·沃纳罗维奇有一大半时间都在与艾滋病作斗争。我交谈过的许多人都说,我一直对他说:“保重身体要紧,你为什么还要操心这个?你对此也无能为力。请照顾好你自己。”但他就是不肯,因为他想反击。对于艺术领域的其他人来说,我认为这毫无疑问地产生了寒蝉效应。国会通过了一系列规定,主要是所谓的“体面条款”(decency clause),以此来限制国家艺术基金会的资助范围。一旦这种情况发生,吉尔伯特,如果你是“克鲁兹博物馆”的馆长,而且——
Original English
Isaac Butler: Everyone I talked to, with the exception of Andre Serrano, disputed this. Andre Serrano is absolutely like Jesse Helms gave me my career. I wrote him a thank you letter in 2000 about it, right? You know, um uh uh he's very open about that. But if you read the memoirs by the four performance artists who came to be known as the NEA4, they were like, you know, my artistic homes couldn't book me because it was too dangerous. They had to hire extra security. I got death threats. You know, no one could see my work for what it was. They were just looking for the controversial thing. There's a lot of pain around that. There's a lot of fighting back against shame, against, you know, trying to find pride in your work again. and just it's exhausting to be under siege like that all the time and trying to create your art. So for the individual artists who were swept up in this, it was very very difficult. David Venerovich was dying of AIDS for much of the time that he was dealing with this. And there were many people I spoke to who were like I just kept telling him like just take care of your health. Why are you worrying about this? Like there's nothing you can do about it. Please take care of yourself. and he just wouldn't do that because he wanted to fight back. For the rest of the arts field, I think it unquestionably had a chilling effect. Congress passes a bunch of rules. Basically, the the main one is called the decency clause to try to hem in what the NEA will fund. And once that happens, if Gilbert, if you were the curator of the Cruz Museum, you know, and uh
吉尔伯特: 我确实是。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: you sure am.
艾萨克: ——是的,你一年只能向国家艺术基金会申请一次资助。你肯定会为你正在做的那场“最不具冒犯性”的展览申请资助。这就使这些温和的作品在思想市场中占据了优势。所以你确实看到当时许多人对记者说:“我现在绝对不会排演这类作品。”因此,对该领域的寒蝉效应是实实在在的。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Yep. you can only apply to the NEA for one grant, you know, a year, you're going to apply for the least offensive show you're doing. So that gives those things an edge in the marketplace of ideas. And so you really really see many people would say to to journalists even at the time like I'm not going to program this stuff right now. So the chilling effect on the field was real.
个人经历与客观性
吉尔伯特: 你与艺术有着非常深厚的个人渊源。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: You have a very personal connection to art.
艾萨克: 是的。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Yes.
吉尔伯特: 包括戏剧以及这一切。你在书中也提到了这一点。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: to theater to all this stuff. You touched on it.
吉尔伯特: 你在书中写到了这些。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: You touch on it in the book.
吉尔伯特: 你从12岁起就在你生活的华盛顿特区成为了一名职业戏剧演员。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: You were a professional theater actor in DC where you live starting at the age of 12.
吉尔伯特: 我想知道,由于这段经历,加上你母亲在各个委员会任职——也就是某种与各种艺术机构的家族联系——你认为这对你思考这些问题的方法有什么影响?这似乎确实是艾萨克·巴特勒灵魂中最炽热的核心。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: And I'm wondering between that and your mother being on various boards sort of like family connections to various art institutions. H how you think that has that has affected the way that you think about all this? It really seems like this is sort of this is at the fiery core of who who Isaac Butler is.
艾萨克: 如果没有艺术作为我存在的核心,我不知道我会成为谁。这发生得太早了。你知道,我从小就喜欢各种各样的艺术。我四年级时看了我的第一部菲利普·格拉斯(Philip Glass)歌剧,那可是高雅艺术。但也有电视和电影。你知道,比如我记得我三岁时在华盛顿特区的住宅区剧院(Uptown Theater)看《幻想曲》(Fantasia)。这确实是我一生中最主要的艺术体验之一——部分原因是我在观影期间流了鼻血,不得不被抱出影院,身上流着血,尖叫着,穿过排了整整一个街区的家长队伍。但我就是无法想象没有艺术的自己。我在书中试图做的一件事,且在引言中也谈到了,就是因为这一点以及我自己的背景,我不会假装在这件事上保持绝对客观。我认为那实际上会非常愚蠢,并且会对这个主题和读者造成伤害。相反,在适当的时候,我会告诉你我真正的想法和感受,并尽最大可能控制我的偏见,保持诚实。这样,如果读者愿意,他们可以自由地与我持不同意见,因为自由表达的一大好处就是我们可以意见相左,并因为这种分歧而丰富自己。我对此深信不疑。
Original English
Isaac Butler: I don't know who I would be without the arts being the the core of who I am. It happened so early. You know, I loved art of all kinds from such an early age. You know, my first Philip Glass opera in fourth grade. That's high art. But then there's also TV and movies. You know, like I remember seeing Fantasia at the Uptown Theater in Washington DC when I was three years old. And it was really one of my foremost artgoing experiences in my entire life. Uh in part because I had a bloody nose during it and had to be carried out of the film bleeding and screaming into an around the block line of parents. But I just I can't imagine myself without it. One of the things that I tried to do in this book, and I talk about this in the introduction to the book, is like because of that and because of my own background, like I'm not going to pretend to be objective about this stuff. I think that would actually be very silly and would do me the subject matter and the reader a disservice. Instead, I'm going to, when appropriate, tell you what I really think and feel about this stuff and then try to control for my biases as much as I possibly can and be honest about that. And then the reader is free to disagree with me if they want to because one of the great things about free expression is that we can disagree about stuff and then be enriched by that disagreement. And I really truly believe in that.
政府在艺术中的角色
吉尔伯特: 你认为政府在艺术中应该扮演什么角色?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: What What do you think the role of the government should be in the arts?
艾萨克: 嗯,我认为国家艺术基金会(NEA)的经典设计是绝妙的。那种“放手模式”(hands-off model),这一切确实非常聪明且效果良好。我很想回到那个模式。但我们现在拥有的并不是那样。后争议时代的国家艺术基金会制定了各种规定,限制你可以资助什么、不能资助什么。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Um, I think the NEA is classically constructed. The hands-off model, you know, all of that stuff was really brilliant and worked really well. And I would love to go back to that. That is not what we have right now. The the post Doge NEA has all these rules about what you can and cannot fund.
吉尔伯特: 但是艾萨克,你为什么认为应该资助艺术呢?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: But why why do you, Isaac, think that this should be
艾萨克: 哦!哦,为什么?对不起,我误解了你的问题。好吧,我是说,除了国家艺术基金会成立前25年里所取得的成就证明了这一点之外,事实的真相在于,我信仰这样一种美国公民的愿景:我们的价值不仅仅在于我们赚钱的能力,也不仅仅在于我们的生产力。艺术是其中绝对至关重要的组成部分。你知道,它们是我们探索主观性、我们与他人的关系、我们的历史以及我们想成为什么样的人的途径。一个不支持艺术、不认为艺术值得纳税人出资的社会,是一个已经断定人的生命唯一价值在于其经济效用的社会。我拒绝接受这样的美国愿景。我认为这是一个非常狭隘、非常可悲的愿景。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Oh. Oh, why? I'm sorry. I misunderstood your question. Yeah. Well, I mean, beyond the fact that the results speak for themselves in terms of what was accomplished over the NEA's first 25 years, the truth of the matter is that I believe in a vision of American citizenship where we are more than just our capacity to make money. We're more than just our productivity. The arts are an absolutely vital component of that. You know, they are how we explore our subjectivity, our relationship to others, our history, who we want to be. And a society that does not support the arts, that does not think the arts are worth taxpayer dollars, is a society that has decided that the only value a human life has is its economic utility. And I reject that vision of America. I think it is a very narrow, very sad vision of America.
历史学家的职责
吉尔伯特: 我想问问你刚才提到的那件事,也就是你试图解释并解决你的偏见,同时在书中坦白“这就是我,这就是我的信仰”。你最近在你的 Substack 上写了一些关于撰写这样一本书意味着什么的话。你写道:“我想重申,历史学家的职责是阐明过去。而不是创造一个延伸的类比,以此来说服人们同意你的政治观点。”因此,撰写一部关于高度争议的政治话题的历史,且你的信仰在其中非常清晰,这就像是在走钢丝。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: I want to ask you about this thing that you just mentioned, you know, sort of trying to account for and you know, solve for your biases, but also just saying in the book, this is who I am, this is what I believe. You wrote recently on your Substack something about what it means to write a a book like this. You said, quote, I want to reiterate the job of the historian is to illuminate the past. It is not to create an extended analogy by which you can convince people to agree with your politics. So there's this way in which writing a piece of history about a highly controversial political topic where your beliefs are clear is a bit of a tightrope.
艾萨克: 这源自我自己的阅读经历。在特朗普的两个任期内,有许多所谓的历史著作实际上完全被作者想要评论当下的强烈愿望所主宰。你知道,那实际上并不是我在做的事情。我是在写80年代和90年代的这些事情,我认为这些事情为许多事情奠定了基础。而且我认为其中有明显的共鸣和教训。但我不是在写一则寓言。如果我想写特朗普,我就会写一本关于特朗普的书,对吧?因此,我认为尊重过去的完整性、让它保持其原本的面貌是至关重要的,而不是强行将它套入服务于你自己的政治论点的模具中。这是一种纪律。这是一种真正的纪律,因为你会感到愤怒。你看着这些历史人物,你看着杰西·赫尔姆斯,你看着唐纳德·怀尔德蒙,你会感到愤怒。你只想写一篇辩驳文。但辩驳文不是历史。历史比这更复杂,比这更具人性。
Original English
Isaac Butler: That that came from, you know, just my own reading that during the Trump admin both Trump administrations, there were a lot of works of purported history that were really overly determined by the writer's desire to comment on the present day. You know, that's not actually what I'm doing. I'm writing about this thing in the 80s and '9s that I think lays the groundwork for a lot. And I think there are clear resonances and lessons. But I'm not writing an allegory. If I wanted to write about Trump, I would write a book about Trump. You know? And so I think it's important to respect the integrity of the past, to let it be what it was, and not to force it into a mold to serve your own political argument. And that is a discipline. It's a real discipline because you get angry. You look at these historical actors, you look at Jesse Helms, you look at Donald Wildmon, and you get mad. And you want to just write a polemic. But a polemic is not history. History is more complicated than that. It's more human than that.
三本书背后的个人追求
吉尔伯特: 这是你的第三本书,如你所知,其中一本是与丹·科伊斯(Dan Kois)合著的。你是否在试图通过这三本书来弄清楚艺术与美国之间的某种关系?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: This is your third book, one of them, as you know, you co-wrote Dan Kois. Is there something you're trying to figure out about art and America through these three books?
艾萨克: 实际上,我自三年级以来的好朋友拆了我的台,他说:“你的三本书其实都是关于你高中时期的,对吧?”他没说错。你知道,我在高一那年看了《天使在美国》,这催生了《世界只管向前旋转》。我在高中时对方法演技(Method Acting)非常痴迷,这催生了《方法》。而这本新书则是关于我高中时期经历的、在电视和博物馆里看到的文化战争。因此,在某种程度上,我只是一直在试图解开我自己的青春期。但在更宏观的层面上,我认为我是在试图弄清楚艺术在我们的社会中是如何发挥作用的,为什么我们如此在乎它,以及为什么它拥有激发如此强烈、有时甚至是暴力反应的力量。它关乎艺术与文化之间的联系,关乎它们相互塑造的方式。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Well, my my best friend since the third grade broke me and he said, "All three of your books are actually about you in high school, aren't they?" And he wasn't wrong. You know, uh I saw Angels in America my freshman year of high school. That led to The World Only Spins Forward. I became obsessed with Method Acting in high school. That led to The Method. And then this book is about the culture wars that I lived through and watched on TV and in museums when I was in high school. So there's this way in which I am just continually trying to unpack my own adolescence. But on a broader level, I think I am trying to figure out how art functions in our society, why we care about it so much, and why it has this power to provoke such intense, sometimes violent reactions. It's about that connection between the art and the culture, the way they shape each other.
吉尔伯特: 我们无法逃避我们的青春。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: we can we cannot escape our youth.
艾萨克: 我们无法逃避我们的青春。我的意思是,所有的写作其实都是自传,对吧,吉尔伯特?所以,确实有这方面的因素。
Original English
Isaac Butler: We can't escape our youth. I mean, all writing is is autobiography, right, Gilbert? And so um so there's that aspect of it.
吉尔伯特: 不,那听起来……那听起来对我来说非常无趣。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: no, that sounds that sounds very boring to me.
艾萨克: 是的,没错。所以我不知道我接下来的每一本书是不是都要在我的余生里一直重复这样做。但就目前而言,这似乎确实是一个模式。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. And so I don't know that every one of my books is going to be doing that for the rest of my life. Um but at the moment, it seems to be the pattern.
吉尔伯特: 是的。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Yeah.
艾萨克的“答辩时间”
吉尔伯特: 好的。那么,进入“By the Book”(书评专栏固定问答)环节,艾萨克·巴特勒,我有几个问题要问你。准备好了吗?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Okay. So, By the Book, Isaac Butler, I have several questions for you. Are you ready?
艾萨克: 准备好了。
Original English
Isaac Butler: I'm ready.
吉尔伯特: 好的。是不是……好的,我已经准备好我的抢答器了。不,开玩笑的。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Okay. Are these Yeah, I've got my buzzer. No.
戏剧与莎士比亚
吉尔伯特: 关于莎士比亚与政治,你写过、思考过、做过播客并讨论过很多。那么,你最喜欢的莎士比亚(Shakespeare)戏剧是哪一部?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: You You have written, thought, and podcasted and talked so much about Shakespeare and politics. So, what is your favorite Shakespeare play?
艾萨克: 这是一个无法回答的问题,对吧?
Original English
Isaac Butler: This is an impossible question, right?
吉尔伯特: 并非无法回答,因为我刚刚就问了。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: It's not impossible because I just asked it.
艾萨克: 嗯,几乎所有人都有一个公认的、稳定的莎士比亚戏剧顶级名单,那是真爱。前五名是《哈姆雷特》(Hamlet)、《第十二夜》(Twelfth Night)、《李尔王》(King Lear)、《亨利四世上册》(Henry IV, Part 1),以及第五部你自选的戏剧,对吧?所以,我要把这些放在一边,因为否则这就好比说“《Revolver》是披头士乐队最好的专辑”一样,这有什么好说的,拜托。因此,我想谈谈一部不在这个顶级名单中,但我认为绝对精彩的戏剧,那就是**《一报还一报》**(Measure for Measure)。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Um, there is a stable top tier of Shakespeare plays that almost everyone agrees on and that's love. The top five is Hamlet, 12th Night, King Lear, Henry IVth, Part One, and A Fifth Play of Your Choosing. Right? So, I'm going to set those aside because otherwise it's like a oh, Revolver is the best Beatles album, right? It's like whom? Come on. And so, I want to talk about one of the plays that is not in that top tier but that I think is absolutely brilliant. And that's Measure for Measure.
艾萨克: 《一报还一报》是一部非常出色的戏剧。事实上,因为我教这门课,所以我可以告诉你这一点:即使你没有太多的莎士比亚背景知识,在阅读文本时它依然显得非常清晰易懂。这是一部关于性政治的戏剧。这是一部关于清教徒虚伪面目的戏剧。这是一部关于性别和性的戏剧。它拥有整个莎士比亚作品中最伟大也最长的场景,即第二幕中伊莎贝拉和安哲罗之间的对手戏。它简直是一部杰作。它是一部“问题剧”,这意味着它无法被简单地归入喜剧或悲剧。这也正是它如此引人入胜的原因。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Measure for Measure is a brilliant play. It's one of the plays where actually, because I teach it, so I can I can tell you this. Um, even if you don't have a lot of Shakespeare knowledge, it's actually a very crystal clear on the page play. It's a play about sexual politics. It's a play about the hypocrisies of Puritanism. It's a play about uh gender and sex. It has the greatest but longest scene in all of Shakespeare, which is the scene between Isabella and Angelo in Act Two. It's just a masterpiece. It's a problem play, which means it doesn't fit neatly into comedy or tragedy. And that's what makes it so fascinating.
艺术与政治交织的书籍推荐
吉尔伯特: 太棒了。真是个精彩的回答。下一个问题:有哪些你最喜欢的书籍探讨了艺术与政治的交集?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: That's incredible. Uh what a great answer. Um next question. What are some of your favorite books that explore the intersection of of art and politics?
艾萨克: 是的。其中一本我想竭力推荐(go to bat for),因为它已经绝版了,我认为应该有人让它重新出版。它是作家安东尼·朱利叶斯(Anthony Julius)写的,书名叫**《越界:艺术的冒犯》(Transgressions: The Offences of Art)。这是一部关于越界艺术的历史,探讨了它为什么有效、为什么无效,以及它如何与国家和公众审美相联系。这是一本非常优美、非常聪明的书。另一本是杰克·洛厄里**(Jack Lowery)最近的新书《那是救命的》(It Was Lifesaving),讲述了 ACT UP 内部的艺术合作组织 Grand Fury 的历史。我不知道你有没有读过。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Yeah. So, one of them I want to go to bath for because it's um it's out of print and I think someone should bring it back into print. So, it's by a a writer named Anthony Julius and it's called Transgressions, the Offenses of Art. And it is a history of transgressive art, why it works, why it doesn't, and how it relates to the state and public taste. It's a beautiful, beautiful, very smart book. Another one is Jack Lowery's recent book, It Was Lifesaving, which is about the history of Grand Fury, the art collective within ACT UP. I don't know if you've read that.
吉尔伯特: 我还没读过。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: I have not.
艾萨克: 这是一本非常优美的书,讲述了 Grand Fury 的故事。Grand Fury 算是 ACT UP 内部最著名的艺术合作组织。他们设计了许多T恤和口号,比如“所有艾滋病患者都是无辜的”,这本书就是关于那个合作组织的历史。杰克·洛厄里采访了所有还健在的人,查阅了大量私人信件藏品。这真的是一部优美且讲述得极其精彩的历史。它是艺术在政治上真正发挥作用的绝佳范例——不仅仅是在做评论,而是真真切切地改变了现实。
Original English
Isaac Butler: It's a beautiful beautiful book about telling the story of Grand Fury. Grand Fury was kind of the most prominent of the art collectives within ACT UP. They uh developed a lot of the t-shirts and slogans like um all people with AIDS are innocent and it's about the history of that collective. Jack Larry interviewed like everyone who's still alive. He interviewed them. He went to tons of private paper collections. It is just a beautiful, beautifully told history. And it's a great example of art that was actually effective politically, not just commenting on it, but actually changing things.
吉尔伯特: 你还可以再点名一本。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: You can name one more.
艾萨克: 好的,那我就选詹姆斯·鲍德温(James Baldwin)的**《魔鬼发现工作》**(The Devil Finds Work)。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Okay, I'm going to go uh let's go James Baldwin, The Devil Finds Work,
艾萨克: 这是他的电影评论集,同时也是一部回忆录,也是一部伟大的政治论著。你知道,在他写作那本书的时代,人们还没有写过这种兼具社会批判、自传和影评性质的影评作品。现在感觉我们每个人随时都在写这种东西,对吧?但他真的是先驱,回到这些先驱之作真的很棒。
Original English
Isaac Butler: his book of film criticism, which is also a memoir, which is also a great political treatise. you know, when he's writing that, people aren't really writing the kind of film criticism that is doing social critique and autobiography and film criticism at the same time. Now, it feels like we all do it all the time, right? But he's really the pioneer, and it's great to go back to those kind of pioneering works.
吉尔伯特: 这一本很棒。我很庆幸我们允许你选择了第三个选项。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: That is a great one. I'm glad we allowed you that that third option there.
艾萨克: 谢谢。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Thank you.
艺术家传记与回忆录
吉尔伯特: 下一个问题:有没有一部艺术家传记、回忆录或自传让你记忆犹新?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Next question. Is there a biography of an artist or a memoir or autobiography that has really stuck with you?
艾萨克: C·卡尔(C. Carr)为大卫·沃纳罗维奇撰写的传记**《腹中之火》(Fire in the Belly: The Life and Times of David Wojnarowicz)是必读之作。我的意思是,C·卡尔写的所有东西都是必读之作。我太喜欢她的作品了。绝对难以置信。如果没有她在《村声》(Village Voice)的专栏和她的书籍,我们根本无法理解80年代 and 90年代的艺术。所以《腹中之火》是非常不可思议的。但我认为有史以来最伟大的艺术家回忆录可能是伊利亚·卡赞**(Elia Kazan)的**《卡赞自传》**(A Life)。你知道,读它就像在看娱乐界的《失乐园》。在第一页上他就写道:“我是恶魔,你们不能相信我说的一切。”然后,在接下来的800页里,他深挖了自己最下流、最黑暗的部分,并将它们倾注在纸面上。它很有趣、很惊人,有时也很冒犯。它照亮了整个艺术史。它就是如此不可思议。它可能是世界上同时最诚实也最虚伪的书。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Fire in the Belly, which is C. Car's biography of David Voyerovich is essential reading. I mean everything See Carc writes is essential reading. I love Secar's work. Um absolutely incredible. We would not understand the 80s and 90s in art without her columns for the village voice in her books. So Fire in the Belly is incredible. But the greatest I think artist memoir of all time might be Elia Kazan's a life which is you know it's like reading parad it's like the paradise lost of showbiz autobiographies. On the first page, he says, "I am the devil, and you cannot trust anything I say." And then for 800 pages, just digs into the most salacious, darkest parts of himself and puts them on the page. It's funny. It's outrageous. It's offensive at times. It It illuminates a whole history of art. It's just It's incredible. It's so incredible. Uh it might be the most honest and dishonest at the same time book ever written.
吉尔伯特: 我很喜欢,听起来很棒。你差点说服我了,但随后你提到它有800页。所以,额……
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: I love it. That sounds awesome. And you almost sold me, but then you said it was 800 pages. So, uh
艾萨克: 我知道。我知道。
Original English
Isaac Butler: I know. I know.
吉尔伯特: 但它太神奇了。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: But it's amazing.
艾萨克: 读起来飞快。听着,当你读到他与玛丽莲·梦露的恋情时,你翻书的手快得就像纸张被翻飞成了火焰。
Original English
Isaac Butler: It flies by. Look, when you get to his Affair with Marilyn Monroe, you're just like the pages are just, you know, turning into flames as you flip them so quickly.
阅读与重读的挣扎
吉尔伯特: 那么,有没有什么书是你发现自己一遍又一遍地回去重读的?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: What um are there books that you find yourself returning to over and over again?
艾萨克: 总是积累了太多书要读,所以每当重读时我总会感到愧疚。在你们版面撰写诗歌专栏的伟大作家艾丽莎·加巴特(Elisa Gabbert)在她的书**《任何人都是唯一的自我》**(Any Person Is the Only Self)中写道:“有人说重读是唯一的阅读,但有时我认为初次阅读是唯一的重读。”我很喜欢这句话,因为这是一个伟大的格言。它简直就像禅宗的公案,也帮我摆脱了重读的压力,因为我有太多想读的书了。在我去世之前,我是无论如何也读不完它们的。
Original English
Isaac Butler: There's always so many to read, so I always feel guilty when I reread. um the great Alisa Gabbart who writes uh the poetry column for your section um in her book Any Person is the Only Self, she has this quote that says uh some people say rereading is the only reading, but sometimes I think first readings are the only rereadings. And I love that because it's a great apherism. It's almost like a Zen Cohen and also it gets me out of the pressure to reread because I have so many books I want to read. There's no way I'll get to all of them before I die.
吉尔伯特: 是的,这种挣扎是实实在在的。我完全明白你在说什么。你最近读到的最喜欢的非虚构类书籍是什么?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Yeah, the struggle is real. I know precisely what you're talking about. What is the latest non-fiction book that you really enjoyed?
历史与非虚构新书
艾萨克: 呃,我想说是理查德·基特纳(Richard Kitner)的**《不怕法老:美国犹太人、内战与结束奴隶制的斗争》**(Fear No Pharaoh: American Jews, the Civil War, and the Fight to End Slavery)。它确实是关于犹太人在奴隶制问题上多样化经历的书。你知道,我们常常在民权运动和奴隶制问题上对自己持有某种美化的看法,但实际上有许多犹太人参与了奴隶贸易。你知道,美国的第一座犹太教堂就是由被奴役的人建造的。所以,它既是一部美国犹太人史,也是一部奴隶制度史,同时也是这两者如何融合在一起的历史。我有点不知道他是怎么做到的,因为书的节奏非常快,讲述得非常优美。有没有一本书非常适合作为礼物送人?你会一直选择它。我喜欢这本书,我喜欢把它送给别人。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Uh, I'm going to say Richard Kitner's Fear No Pharaoh, American Jews, the Civil War and the Fight to End Slavery. And it's really about the variety of Jewish experience in terms of the slavery question. you know, um, you know, he's not there's lots of Jews. I think we like to have a somewhat flattering opinion of ourselves uh in the civil rights movement and the sla and and slavery, but lots of Jews involved in the slave trade. You know, the first synagogue in America was built by enslaved people. So, it it's both a history of Jews in the United States and a history of the institution of slavery and a history of how those things meld together all in one. I sort of don't know how he did it because it moves very quickly and it's it's really beautifully told. Is there a book that's just reliable to give as a gift? You'll always fall back on. I love this book. I love giving it to people.
吉尔伯特: 我送人效果非常好的一本书是《纽约时报书评》出版社(New York Review of Books Editions)重新发行的萨尔卡·菲尔特尔(Salka Viertel)的回忆录**《陌生人的善意》**(The Kindness of Strangers)。她是一位波兰犹太裔舞台剧女演员,后来前往维也纳,成为了维也纳舞台上的名角,之后她逃离欧洲来到加州,与许多其他犹太知识分子一样,在加州她成为了葛丽泰·嘉宝(Greta Garbo)最好的朋友和首选编剧,甚至可能是情人(尽管回忆录中并未对此进行讨论)。她有一个德国犹太裔丈夫,他们有着非常开放的波西米亚式关系,她的房子成为了洛杉矶德国流亡知识分子生活的中心。比如,托马斯·曼(Thomas Mann)的生日就是在她家过的。电影界的许多人也常聚在她家,所以她的一生真的非常传奇,她讲述这一切的方式也十分优美有趣。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: One that I've had really good luck with is this book that New York Review of Books Editions put out uh reissued called The Kindness of Strangers by Sula Vertell and it's a memoir. She's a Polish Jewish stage actress who eventually makes her way to Vienna and she's a big actress in the vianese stage and then she flees and comes to California along with you know many of the other Jewish intelligencia where she becomes Greta Garbo's best friend and go-to screenwriter and maybe lover although that's not discussed in the memoir. She has this German Jewish husband. They have this very open bohemian relationship and her house becomes the center of German intellectual exile life in Los Angeles. So you know like Thomas man's birthday is at her house. You know all the people in the film industry are there and so she just led this really extraordinary life and the way she talks about it is really beautiful and fun.
艾萨克的床头书单
吉尔伯特: 听起来太吸引人了。这是我最后一个问题。艾萨克·巴特勒,
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: That sounds fascinating. I have the last one. Isaac Butler,
吉尔伯特: 你的床头柜(真实的或隐喻的床头柜)上现在放着几本什么书?
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: what are a couple books that are on your nightstand? Real or metaphorical nightstand? Well, I should send you a photo of my nightstand because my my New Year's resolution this year is to default to books that I owned prior to New Year's because I have so many that I have accumulated over decades that I have not read. And it's sort of like that scene in High Fidelity where he's reorganizing his his records autobiographically, you know. Um, so, you know, there's books on my nightstand that I got in college and was supposed to read and didn't, but I've always wanted to read, you know. So, I have just tons of them. So, how many do you want? I I made a list.
吉尔伯特: 给我两本。就两本。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Give me two. Give me two.
艾萨克: 给你两本,好的。我给你两本我今天早上看的时候字面意义上最先找到的书。第一本是巴里·斯科特·温普海默(Barry Scott Wimpfheimer)的**《塔木德自传》(The Talmud: A Biography),这字面意义上就是关于《塔木德》是如何被撰写出来的历史。第二本是路易斯·布努埃尔**(Luis Buñuel)的回忆录**《我的最后叹息》**(My Last Sigh)。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Give you two. Okay. I'm going to give you two. The the literal first two I found this morning when I looked. Uh, The Talmud, a biography by Barry Scott Whimfimer, which is literally like a biography of the like how was the Talmud written and stuff like that. Um, and my last sigh, which is the memoir by uh Lewis Bunwell.
吉尔伯特: 天哪。你刚才推荐的书籍范围……
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Good lord. The the range of books that you just recommended was,
吉尔伯特: 真的是太绝妙了。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: you know, the thing is is that
艾萨克: 我觉得对我来说,因为我有许多不同的兴趣,最起作用的就是“整合”(synthesis)。我认为这也是真正吸引我做某些主题、并且我在纸面上非常擅长的事情之一。所以我决定将自己像喜鹊一样到处搜罗的特点转化为我自己的优势。
Original English
Isaac Butler: superb. I think the thing that works for me because I have a lot of different interests is synthesis. Like I think that's one of the things that really draws me to certain subjects and that I'm good at on the page. And so I've decided to use the fact that I'm a magpie to my own advantage.
吉尔伯特: 令人印象深刻。艾萨克·巴特勒,新书《完美的时刻:上帝、性、艺术与美国文化战争的诞生》的作者。非常感谢你加入我们的书评节目。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: Extremely impressive. Isaac Butler, author of The Perfect Moment: God, Sex, Art, and the Birth of America's Culture Wars. Thank you so much for joining the book review.
艾萨克: 谢谢你,吉尔伯特。
Original English
Isaac Butler: Thank you, Gilbert.
吉尔伯特: 书评节目由莎拉·戴蒙德、艾米·珀尔和帕特里夏·苏拉丹制作。由翠西·芒福德编辑,佩德罗·罗萨多混音。原创音乐由丹·鲍威尔和艾丽西亚·埃图普创作。特别鸣谢达利亚·哈达德。我们想听到您对节目的看法,请发送电子邮件至 thebookreview@nytimes.com。我是吉尔伯特·克鲁兹。谢谢收听。
Original English
Gilbert Cruz: The book review is produced by Sarah Diamond, Amy Pearl, and Patricia Suladan. It's edited by Tracy Mumford, and mixed by Pedro Rosado. Original music by Dan Powell and Alicia Etup. Special thanks to Dalia Hadad. We want to hear what you think about the show, so send us an email at the bookreview@ny times.com. I'm Gilbert Cruz. Thanks for listening.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
公司/组织: National Endowment for the Arts, Heritage Foundation, American Family Association
媒体/书籍: The Perfect Moment: God, Sex, Art, and the Birth of America\'s Culture Wars, The Method: How the 20th Century Learned to Act, The World Only Spins Forward, Transgressions: The Offences of Art, The Devil Finds Work, Fire in the Belly, Elia Kazan: A Life, Any Person Is the Only Self, Fear No Pharaoh: American Jews, the Civil War, and the Fight to End Slavery, The Kindness of Strangers, The Talmud: A Biography, My Last Sigh