为什么现在找工作如此艰难?AI、政策不确定性与疫情经济的终结 Money & Macro 2025-12-02

当前就业市场:年轻人面临的挑战

我们将会失业。

View/Hide Original English

We are going to be unemployed.

我们永远也找不到工作了。

View/Hide Original English

We are never getting a job.

我在找到一份工作之前,申请了647个职位。

View/Hide Original English

And I applied to 647 roles before I got one.

我有一个朋友经历了AI面试(Artificial Intelligence Interview: 由人工智能进行的招聘面试)。

View/Hide Original English

One of my friends had an AI interview.

AI进行面试?

View/Hide Original English

The AI did the interviewing.?

是的。

View/Hide Original English

Yeah.

有人能告诉我,有人能向我解释一下最近就业市场到底发生了什么吗?

View/Hide Original English

Someone tell me. Someone tell me and explain to me what is going on with the job market recently.

好的,好的,我来解释。

View/Hide Original English

Okay, okay, I'll do it.

正如你所看到的,对于很多年轻人来说,尤其是现在,找工作似乎真的非常困难。

View/Hide Original English

As you've just seen, to a lot of especially young people, it feels like it's really difficult to get a job right now.

当然。

View/Hide Original English

Sure.

官方数据显示,经济状况依然良好,股市也肯定处于高位。

View/Hide Original English

Officially, the economy is still doing quite fine and stock markets are certainly super high.

那么,到底发生了什么?

View/Hide Original English

So what's going on?

为什么现在找工作如此困难?

View/Hide Original English

Why is it so difficult to get a job right now?

根据很大一部分老板的说法,原因很简单:大多数由初级员工完成的任务都可以由AI(Artificial Intelligence: 人工智能)来执行。

View/Hide Original English

According to a large share of bosses, the reason is simple. Most tasks carried out by entry level colleagues could be performed by a AI.

但这真的是事实吗?

View/Hide Original English

But is that really true?

就业市场真的那么糟糕吗?

View/Hide Original English

Is the job market really that bad?

对年轻人来说尤其糟糕吗?

View/Hide Original English

Is it especially bad for young people?

最重要的是,这是因为AI造成的吗,还是老板们只是这样说,因为这比指责唐纳德·特朗普的贸易战政治风险要小得多?

View/Hide Original English

And most importantly, is it bad because of AI or are bosses just saying that because it's much less politically risky than blaming Donald Trump's trade war?

或者这比承认他们在疫情期间雇佣了太多人更容易?

View/Hide Original English

Or it's easier than admitting that they hired too many people during the pandemic.

这就是经济学家们一直在深入研究的问题。

View/Hide Original English

That is the question economists have been doing a ton of in-depth research about.

是的,一如既往,在“Money and Macro”节目中,我们将为你省去自己阅读所有这些研究的麻烦。

View/Hide Original English

And yes, as always here on Money and Macro, we will spare you the need to read all of that yourself.

我们在这段视频中总结了这一现象的三个最重要的解释。

View/Hide Original English

And we have summarized the three most important explanations for this phenomenon in this video.

但在深入探讨它们具体是什么之前,让我们快速看一下数据。

View/Hide Original English

But before getting into exactly what they are, let's have a quick look at the data.

这些TikTok用户说得对吗?

View/Hide Original English

Are these TikTokers right?

现在找工作真的很难吗?

View/Hide Original English

Is it actually difficult to get a job right now?

就业数据分析:失业率与新职位发布

首先最明显的地方就是失业率。

View/Hide Original English

The most obvious place to look first is the unemployment rate.

也就是说,在美国,正在积极寻找工作但目前找不到工作的适龄劳动人口的百分比,我们可以清楚地看到,自2022年夏天以来,失业率确实一直在上升,从大约3.5%升至4.3%。

View/Hide Original English

That is, the percentage of working age people actively looking for a job, but who cannot find one right now in the US, we can clearly see that indeed, unemployment has been rising since the summer of 2022 from about 3.5% to 4.3%.

与此同时,在英国、德国等欧洲主要经济体,就业市场危机也备受关注,我们也可以看到失业率已经回升到仅在疫情期间才出现的水平。

View/Hide Original English

Meanwhile, in big European economies like the UK, Germany, where a job market crisis has also been in the news a lot, we can also see that unemployment is already heading back towards levels only seen in the pandemic.

然而,当今劳动力市场真正引人注目的是,我们看到尽管一些知名公司进行了大规模裁员,但失业率的上升似乎并非由更多裁员驱动,而是由公司新职位发布数量的显著下降所致。

View/Hide Original English

But what's really striking, though, about the labor market today is that we have seen that despite some really spectacular layoffs at high profile companies, and the rise in unemployment really does not seem to be driven by so many more layoffs, but rather by a quite spectacular fall in new job postings by companies.

正如我们在这里看到的,这一趋势在美国、英国和德国都成立。

View/Hide Original English

As we can see here. That trend holds for the US, but also for the UK and Germany.

然而,如果我们观察年轻人是否特别受到最严重的打击,我们可以看到在这三个国家中,青年失业率都比普通失业率高出不少。

View/Hide Original English

However, if we look at whether or not young people in particular are hit the hardest. We can see that in all three countries, youth unemployment is quite a bit higher than regular unemployment.

但如果我们观察自2022年以来的增长幅度,我们可以看到只有在英国,青年失业率的增长速度快得多。

View/Hide Original English

But if we look at how much it's risen since 2022, we can see that only in the UK has the youth unemployment really risen much faster.

在德国,它与普通失业率非常接近,而在美国,自2022年以来,年轻工人的表现实际上仍然好于平均水平。

View/Hide Original English

In Germany, It's pretty close to regular unemployment, and in the US, young workers have actually still done better than average since 2022.

这有点奇怪,考虑到AI本应取代如此多的初级工作。

View/Hide Original English

That's kind of strange, given that AI was supposed to have taken so many entry level jobs.

所以这里显然有更多的事情正在发生。

View/Hide Original English

So there's clearly more going on here.

事实上,我们已经确定了三个主要趋势,可以帮助解释为什么你现在找不到工作。

View/Hide Original English

In fact, we've identified three major trends that can help explain why you can't find a job anymore.

是的,AI仍然是一个因素,但它比你想象的要微妙。

View/Hide Original English

Yes, AI is still a factor, but it's more subtle than you think.

那么,让我们深入探讨一下。

View/Hide Original English

So let's get into it.

解释一:AI对就业市场的影响

以下是AI的崛起实际上如何影响就业市场的方式。

View/Hide Original English

Here's how the rise of AI is actually impacting the job market.

有一点是肯定的,许多企业已经在使用AI,还有更多企业计划引入它。

View/Hide Original English

One thing is for sure, many businesses are already using AI and many more are planning to introduce it.

例如,在德国,大约27%的公司正在积极使用AI。

View/Hide Original English

In Germany, for example, about 27% of firms are actively using AI.

另有80%的公司计划使用它,34%的公司正在积极讨论它。

View/Hide Original English

Another 80% is planning to use it and 34% is actively discussing it.

只有大约21%的公司认为它不相关。

View/Hide Original English

And only about 21% think it's not relevant.

这些数字非常惊人。

View/Hide Original English

These are very impressive numbers.

为了说明AI采用率有多么惊人,请看这张图表,它比较了个人AI的采用情况与20世纪80年代个人电脑或20世纪90年代互联网的采用情况。

View/Hide Original English

Just to illustrate how spectacular AI adoption percentages are. Have a look at this graph comparing personal AI adoption to people adopting, for example, personal computers in the 1980s or the internet in the 1990s.

这意味着AI是人类历史上采用速度最快的技术。

View/Hide Original English

This means that AI is the most rapidly adopted technology in human history.

想想看。

View/Hide Original English

Think about that.

所以,如果我们在劳动力市场完全看不到任何影响,那将是非常奇怪的。

View/Hide Original English

So actually, it would be quite straight if we did not see any effect at all in the labor market.

但仅仅因为企业正在使用AI,这本身并不意味着它正在导致失业。

View/Hide Original English

But just because businesses are using AI, that by itself does not mean that it's costing jobs.

毕竟,公司可以使用AI来取代人员,但他们也可以使用它来提高现有员工的生产力。

View/Hide Original English

After all, companies could be using AI to replace people, but they could also be using it to make existing workers more productive.

为了找出AI是否正在导致人们被解雇或至少不被雇佣,斯坦福大学经济学家Erik Brynjolfsson、Bharat Chander和Raju Chen研究了软件开发人员和客户服务等特别受新AI模型影响的职业的超详细工资数据。

View/Hide Original English

To find out whether AI is getting people fired or not hired, at least, Stanford economists Erik Brynjolfsson, Bharat Chander and Raju Chen studied super detailed payroll data from occupations that were especially exposed to new AI models like software developers and customer service.

正如你在这里看到的,在ChatGPT推出后(由垂直线表示),那些通过执行简单任务来支持老程序员的早期职业软件开发人员迅速从公司消失。

View/Hide Original English

As you can see here, early career software developers who tended to support older coders by doing simple tasks rapidly, disappeared from companies after the launch of ChatGPT indicated by the vertical line.

然而,经验更丰富的程序员仍然被雇佣。

View/Hide Original English

However, more experienced coders kept being hired.

正如你在这里看到的,同样的趋势也可以在客户服务中看到。

View/Hide Original English

And as you can see here, the same trend can be seen in customer services.

在GPT之后,年轻人迅速从客户服务中心消失,而经验更丰富的员工则留了下来。

View/Hide Original English

After GPT, young people disappeared from customer service centers at a rapid pace while more experienced workers remained.

与此同时,在仓库工作的库存员(stock clerks)和健康助理(health aides)等受AI影响较小的职位上的年轻人,并没有看到就业人数的大幅下降。

View/Hide Original English

Meanwhile, young people in less exposed jobs like stock clerks working in warehouses and health aides did not see this massive drop in employment.

这提供了一些相当确凿的证据,表明AI确实正在影响就业,但仅限于某些行业,在这些行业中,年轻、经验较少的人确实比经验更丰富的同事受到更大的伤害。

View/Hide Original English

That is some pretty solid evidence that AI is absolutely impacting jobs, but only in certain sectors and in these sectors, it's the young, less experienced people that are indeed hurt more than their more experienced colleagues.

当然,仅仅看一项研究是不够的。

View/Hide Original English

But of course, just looking at one study is not enough.

经济学家Hui、Reshef和Zhou进行了另一项非常有趣的研究。

View/Hide Original English

Another really interesting study was done by economists Hui, Reshef and Zhou.

他们没有关注工人,而是关注了流行招聘网站Upwork上发布的自由职业工作。

View/Hide Original English

Rather than looking at workers, they looked at freelancer jobs posted on the popular jobs market website Upwork.

具体来说,他们研究了两个不同的AI浪潮。

View/Hide Original English

Specifically, they studied two distinct AI waves.

首先,他们研究了像GPT这样的基于文本的AI模型如何影响像文案撰稿人这样的基于写作的自由职业。

View/Hide Original English

First, they research how text based AI models like GPT affected writing based freelance jobs like copywriters.

之后,他们研究了像Midjourney和DALL E这样的图像模型如何影响平面设计师的自由职业市场。

View/Hide Original English

And after that, they looked at how image models like Midjourney and DALL E affected the freelance job market for graphic designers.

有趣的是,他们发现在这些模型引入之前(再次由黑色垂直线表示),受影响和非专家职位之间的关系是稳定的。

View/Hide Original English

Now, interestingly, they found a clear impact before the introduction of these models, which is the black vertical line, again, exposed and non-expert. Those jobs had a stable relation compared to each other.

而在AI之后,有一个清晰的趋势表明,受影响的职位数量与非受影响的职位相比迅速下降。

View/Hide Original English

And then after AI, there is a clear trend showing the number of jobs were exposed. Jobs declined rapidly compared to these non exposed jobs.

结合这两项研究,我认为有明确的证据表明,AI已经导致了一些失业,鉴于它主要影响经验较少的人,这确实可能表现为招聘减少,使得找工作变得更加困难,尤其是对年轻人而言。

View/Hide Original English

Combining these two studies, I think there's clear evidence that AI is already leading to some job losses where, given that it mostly affects less experienced people, this could indeed show up as less hiring, making it more difficult to find a job, especially for young people.

除非AI创造的就业机会多于其摧毁的就业机会。

View/Hide Original English

Unless AI is creating more jobs than it is destroying.

毕竟,在过去,新技术常常会彻底淘汰特定的工作。

View/Hide Original English

After all, in the past, new technologies have obliterated specific jobs very often.

但很快,新的工作就会出现来取代它们。

View/Hide Original English

But soon after, new jobs appeared to replace them.

例如,印刷机的发明使抄写员的就业市场遭受重创。

View/Hide Original English

For example, the invention of the printing press decimated the jobs market for scribes.

但与此同时,它也创造了像装订、出版和图书销售等工作。

View/Hide Original English

But at the same time it created jobs like book binding, publishing, and book selling.

数字技术的发明摧毁了电话接线员或所谓“人工计算机”(手工进行复杂计算的人)的就业市场。

View/Hide Original English

The invention of digital technologies ruined the job market for switchboard operators, or so-called human computers, who did complex calculations by hand.

但随着时间的推移,它创造了许多新的工作,如程序员、网页开发人员和数据科学家。

View/Hide Original English

But over time, it created a lot of new jobs like programmer, web developer, and data scientist.

那么,今天也是这种情况吗?

View/Hide Original English

So is that the case today as well?

是的。

View/Hide Original English

Yeah.

可能有点。

View/Hide Original English

Probably somewhat.

研究员Henley Wing Chiu最近对美国就业市场的分析显示,许多就业机会下降幅度最大的职位正是那些受AI影响最大的职位:计算机图形艺术家、摄影师和作家。

View/Hide Original English

A recent analysis by researcher Henley Wing Chiu on the US job market reveals that many of the jobs with the biggest declines were exactly those that AI affected the most. Computer graphics artist, photographer and writer.

另一方面,去年美国就业增长最快的职位是机器学习工程师。

View/Hide Original English

On the other hand, the US job seeing the most increases last year was Machine Learning Engineer.

遗憾的是,他的分析只提供了百分比,所以它没有告诉我们具体有多少工作岗位流失,因此我们无法将其与新增的工作岗位进行比较。

View/Hide Original English

Sadly, his analysis only gives us percentages though, so it does not tell us exactly how many jobs were lost so that we cannot compare them to jobs gained.

事实上,我找不到任何关于这方面的良好研究,但如果我不得不押注,我敢打赌我们现在正看到AI的两种效应。

View/Hide Original English

In fact, I couldn't find any good research on this, but if I had to put my money on it, I bet that we are seeing both effects of AI right now.

它正在提高一些工人的生产力,但平均而言,它也在导致更多的失业,而不是创造更多的就业。

View/Hide Original English

It is making some workers more productive, but on average is also costing more jobs than it is creating.

但我认为到目前为止,这种影响仅限于图形设计和写作等行业。

View/Hide Original English

But I think so far this effect is limited to sectors like graphic design and writing.

然而,正如你在这张由经济创新集团(Economic Innovation Group: 一个关注经济增长和创新的智库)提供的图表中看到的,像橙色和蓝色线条所示的那些高度暴露于AI的职位的失业率正在上升。

View/Hide Original English

However, as you can see in this graph by the Economic Innovation group, unemployment for jobs that are super exposed to AI like the orange and blue lines is rising.

绝对如此。

View/Hide Original English

Absolutely.

但实际上,像绿色和黄色线条所示的那些受AI影响较小的职位的失业率也在上升。

View/Hide Original English

But actually unemployment in less exposed jobs like the green and yellow lines is rising as well.

所以我无法完全解释为什么你现在找不到工作。

View/Hide Original English

So I cannot fully explain why you cannot find a job right now.

赞助商:Cape——隐私优先的移动运营商

要真正弄清为什么现在找工作如此困难,我们需要谈谈第二个主要的全球发展。

View/Hide Original English

To truly get to the bottom of why it's so difficult to find a job right now. We need to talk about a second major global development.

但首先,我们需要谈谈幕后正在发生的另一件事。

View/Hide Original English

But first, we need to talk about something else that's happening behind the scenes.

因为就像就业市场一样,我们每天依赖的许多系统正在以大多数人没有注意到的方式发生变化,包括运行我们手机的网络。

View/Hide Original English

Because just like the job market, a lot of systems we rely on every day are changing in ways most people do not notice, including the networks that run our phones.

这引出了我们今天的赞助商Cape。

View/Hide Original English

That brings us to today's sponsor, Cape.

美国唯一的隐私优先移动运营商。

View/Hide Original English

America's only privacy first mobile carrier.

如果你对AT&T、Verizon和T-Mobile等大型运营商从事不透明的数据销售行为感到不适,那么你会很高兴知道现在终于有了一个真正的隐私优先替代方案:Cape。

View/Hide Original English

If you are uncomfortable with big carriers like AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile engaging in opaque data selling practices, then you'll be happy to know that there's now finally a true privacy first alternative. Cape.

Cape从零开始为隐私和安全而构建。

View/Hide Original English

Cape is built up from the ground for privacy and security.

当然,你可以使用VPN或加密消息应用程序,但你总会在网络层面受到攻击。

View/Hide Original English

Sure, you can use a VPN or encrypted messenger app, but you'd always be vulnerable at the network level.

Cape解决了这个问题。

View/Hide Original English

Cape fixes that.

与传统运营商不同,Cape在注册时不需要你的姓名、地址,甚至社会安全号码。

View/Hide Original English

Unlike traditional carriers, Cape does not ask for your name, address, or even Social Security number when you sign up.

它只收集最基本的信息,并自动删除它所收集的数据。

View/Hide Original English

It collects really the bare minimum and automatically deletes what it does collect.

Cape还通过使用只有你控制的24个单词的私钥来防止SIM卡劫持(SIM swaps: 一种身份盗窃方式,通过将受害者的手机号码转移到攻击者控制的SIM卡上,从而截取短信和电话)。

View/Hide Original English

Cape also protects against SIM swaps by using a 24 word private key that only you control.

没有它,任何客服人员都无法移动你的号码,而且它增强了信号保护,可以阻止可能暴露你位置或拦截你电话的网络层面攻击。

View/Hide Original English

No customer service agent can move your number without it, and it's enhanced. Signaling protection blocks the kind of network level of text that can reveal your location or intercept your calls.

Cape也不仅仅是另一个经销商。

View/Hide Original English

Cape is not just another reseller either.

它是一个重型MVNO(heavy MVNO: Mobile Virtual Network Operator,移动虚拟网络运营商,拥有并运营自己的核心网络基础设施),这意味着它拥有并运营自己的移动核心网络,从而完全控制它收集哪些数据、不收集哪些数据、如何保护数据以及谁可以访问数据。

View/Hide Original English

It's a heavy MVNO, which means it owns and operates its own mobile core, giving it total control over the data which it gets collected and which does not, how it's secured and who can access it.

这是美国其他任何专注于隐私的运营商都无法做到的。

View/Hide Original English

That's something no other privacy focused carrier in the US does.

所以,如果你厌倦了成为产品,并且真的想要一个能保护你数据隐私的运营商,请通过我的链接Cape.co/moneymacro查看Cape,并使用我的代码MANDM33,即可享受Cape前六个月33%的折扣,或者使用描述中的链接了解更多信息并立即开始保护你的手机。

View/Hide Original English

So if you're tired of being the product and you actually want a carrier that keeps your data private, check out Cape through my link at Cape.co/moneymacro and use my code MANDM33 to get 33% off your first six months of Cape, or use the link in the description to learn more and start protecting your phone today.

话虽如此,让我们回到第二个解释:大规模的政策不确定性。

View/Hide Original English

That said, let's get back to explanation number two massive policy uncertainty.

解释二:大规模政策不确定性

当然,这个原因主要与一个人有关。

View/Hide Original English

Of course, this reason is mostly about one man.

谢谢大家,也谢谢媒体,媒体表现得很棒。

View/Hide Original English

Thank you everybody, and thank you to the media, the media has been terrific.

信不信由你,我没有——看?

View/Hide Original English

Believe it or not, I didn’t use- see?

我一次都没有用过“假新闻”这个词。

View/Hide Original English

I didn’t use the words fake news one time.

没错。

View/Hide Original English

That's right.

特朗普先生和他的贸易战到目前为止确实以混乱和不确定性为特征。

View/Hide Original English

Mr. Trump and his trade war so far has really been characterized by chaos and uncertainty.

请看《金融时报》这张引人入胜的图表。

View/Hide Original English

Have a look at this fascinating graph by the Financial Times.

它显示,平均而言,特朗普提出的关税在过去一年中像疯了一样上下波动。

View/Hide Original English

It shows that on average, Trump's proposed tariffs have been going up and down like crazy over the year.

与此同时,实际关税也缓慢跟进。

View/Hide Original English

Meanwhile, actual tariffs have slowly followed.

但关键是,企业事先并不知道这一点。

View/Hide Original English

But crucially, businesses did not know that in advance.

众所周知,当政府在激进和不可预测的政策之间摇摆时,受影响的企业会停滞不前,公司会推迟招聘,推迟投资,并等待看接下来将在什么规则下运营。

View/Hide Original English

It's well known that when governments swing between aggressive and unpredictable policies, affected businesses freeze, firms delay hiring, postpone investments and wait to see what rules they'll be operating under next.

是的,我们确实可以在数据中看到,最近的不确定性异常高。

View/Hide Original English

And yes, we can actually see in the data that uncertainty is unusually high these days.

所谓的政策不确定性指数(policy uncertainty index: 衡量经济政策不确定性的指标)在过去一年中在欧洲和美国都急剧上升,这与唐纳德·特朗普于2025年1月上任的时间相吻合。

View/Hide Original English

The so-called policy uncertainty index has exploded over the past year in both Europe and the United States, coinciding with Donald Trump taking office in January 2025.

这能解释为什么公司不再招聘了吗?

View/Hide Original English

Could this explain why companies are not hiring anymore?

世界各地的前诺贝尔经济学奖得主保罗·克鲁格曼认为,特朗普反复无常的政策实际上正在制造巨大的不确定性,这阻碍了许多公司雇佣工人。

View/Hide Original English

All around the world, former economics Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman argues that Trump's wildly erratic policies are in fact creating huge uncertainty, which is deterring many companies from hiring workers.

他对此的主要证据是,自“解放日”(Trump宣布其最剧烈的关税变化之时)以来,长期失业者(long term unemployed: 持续失业时间较长的人群)的数量确实激增。

View/Hide Original English

His main piece of evidence for this is that the number of long term unemployed has really surged since Liberation Day, the moment Trump announced his most dramatic tariff changes.

第二条证据涉及黑人工人,他们的失业率在“解放日”后也急剧攀升。

View/Hide Original English

The second piece of evidence concerns Black workers whose unemployment rate has also climbed sharply after Liberation Day.

从历史上看,黑人工人是美国最早被解雇、最晚被重新雇佣的人群之一。

View/Hide Original English

Historically, Black workers are among the first to be laid off and the last to be rehired in the US.

因此,那里的不确定性上升确实是更广泛问题的信号。

View/Hide Original English

So rising uncertainty there is really a signal of broader problems.

但特朗普的政策也产生了超出美国国界的影响。

View/Hide Original English

例如,德国Ifo经济研究所(Ifo institute: 德国著名的经济研究机构)估计,由于这些政策,德国制造业可能会萎缩约2.8%,其中汽车和制药行业受到的打击最严重。

View/Hide Original English

For example, Germany's Ifo institute estimates that German manufacturing could shrink by about 2.8% because of them, with the automobile and pharmaceutical industries taking the hardest hits.

但德国的不确定性并非仅来自特朗普。

View/Hide Original English

But Germany's uncertainty doesn't come from Trump alone.

它也来自中国,中国的大规模工业崛起正在对德国工业造成特别严重的打击。

View/Hide Original English

It comes from China as well, where a massive industrial rise is hitting German industry especially hard.

在受影响较小的国家,就业似乎还没有承受那么大的压力。

View/Hide Original English

In the less exposed countries, jobs don't seem to be under as much pressure yet.

荷兰、法国、西班牙以及所有这些国家,AI都扮演着重要角色,但那里的不确定性较小,这可以解释为什么这些国家的失业率尚未上升那么多。

View/Hide Original English

The Netherlands, France, Spain and all of these countries, AI is playing a major role, but there's less uncertainty, and this could explain why unemployment is not yet rising as much in these countries.

与此同时,英国受贸易战的影响也较小,但其企业表示,他们最担心的是本国政府带来的不确定性,即政府在提高税收、提高最低工资和增加企业必须支付的国民保险缴款方面难以提供明确性。

View/Hide Original English

Meanwhile, the UK is also less exposed to the trade war, but their businesses have indicated they are mostly concerned about uncertainty from its own government that is, struggling to provide clarity on how much it will raise taxes, how much it will increase the minimum wage and increase the national insurance contributions that these firms have to pay.

然而,无论是关于美国、中国还是英国的不确定性,关于不确定性解释普遍存在一个大问题:时机。

View/Hide Original English

However, whether it's about the US, China or UK uncertainty, there's one big problem with the uncertainty explanation in general; the timing.

如果我们观察过去几年招聘下降的趋势,它与时间并不完全吻合。

View/Hide Original English

If we look at the falling hiring trend over a couple of years, it just doesn't match up.

自2022年以来,就业机会一直在减少,而到了2025年才真正变得极端。

View/Hide Original English

Jobs are decreasing ever since 2022, and in turn they only really became extreme in 2025.

因此,要充分理解为什么现在找工作如此困难,我们需要谈谈我们最后的解释,那就是新冠经济的解体(unwinding of the Covid economy: 指疫情期间政府刺激措施和超低利率政策的逐步结束)。

View/Hide Original English

Therefore, to fully understand why it's so difficult to find a job right now, we need to talk about our final explanation, which is the unwinding of the Covid economy.

解释三:新冠疫情经济的终结

你看,在当前的媒体环境中,我缺少一件事,也是我希望通过这个频道解决的问题,那就是真正长期的宏观经济视角。

View/Hide Original English

You see, one thing I’m missing in the current media landscape, and that I hope to address with this channel, is that a truly long term macroeconomic perspective.

是的,正如我们所看到的,失业率正在上升。

View/Hide Original English

Yes, as we have seen, unemployment is rising.

但如果我们把时间线拉长几十年会发生什么?

View/Hide Original English

But what happens if we zoom out a couple of decades?

那么你会看到美国、英国和德国的这张图景。

View/Hide Original English

Then you get this picture in the US, you get this picture in the UK and you get this picture in Germany.

现在,如果我们在这张图表上画一条线,我们可以看到失业率仍然远低于——或者在英国的情况下,接近其长期历史平均水平。

View/Hide Original English

Now, if we draw a line on these graphs, we can see that unemployment is still well under- or maybe in the case of the UK, near to its long term historical average.

最重要的是,如果我看着这些图表,有两件事真的让我印象深刻。

View/Hide Original English

On top of that, two things really stand out to me. If I look at these pictures.

首先是失业率是周期性的。

View/Hide Original English

The first is that unemployment comes and goes in cycles.

其次是失业率在疫情前后确实异常低。

View/Hide Original English

And the second is that unemployment was really exceptionally low right before and after Covid.

这是大辞职潮(Great Resignation: 疫情期间大量员工离职寻求更好工作条件的现象)时期,工作机会如此之多,以至于人们能够离开虐待他们的老板和低薪工作,转到薪酬更高的职位。

View/Hide Original English

This was the period of the Great resignation, where jobs were so available that people were able to leave abusive bosses and underpaid jobs and move to better paid positions.

这听起来确实像是就业市场应该一直保持的状态,不是吗?

View/Hide Original English

That actually sounds like the way the job market should always be, doesn't it?

那么,是什么结束了这段时期呢?

View/Hide Original English

So what ended this period?

嗯,我认为最合理的解释是高额政府刺激和超低利率的结束。

View/Hide Original English

Well, I think the most plausible explanation is the end of high government stimulus and ultra low interest rates.

政府现在又开始担心这个问题了。

View/Hide Original English

Governments are now worried again about that.

中央银行已经提高了利率。

View/Hide Original English

And central banks have increased interest rates.

结果是,大多数经济体中流通的资金减少了,因此,现在的工作机会不如以前多了。

View/Hide Original English

As a result, less money is circulating in most economies and as a result of that, there just now aren't as many jobs as there used to be.

结论与未来展望

那么回到我们最初的问题,现在找工作真的很难吗,尤其是对年轻人来说,就像我们在这些TikTok视频中看到的那样?

View/Hide Original English

So to get back to our original question, is it really that difficult to find a job right now, especially for young people, like we're seeing in these TikToks?

是的,绝对如此。

View/Hide Original English

Yes, absolutely.

至少与三年前相比是这样,这部分可以由AI解释,当然,还有一些地缘政治不确定性。

View/Hide Original English

At least when you compare it to just three years ago, this can partially be explained by AI sure, and some geopolitical uncertainty.

当然。

View/Hide Original English

Sure.

但从历史上看,遗憾的是,我们目前所看到的情况,实际上只是简单地回归了常态。

View/Hide Original English

But historically speaking, sadly, it looks like what we've seen so far is really simply an return to normality.

这几乎可以完全用新冠疫情刺激措施的结束来解释。

View/Hide Original English

That can be explained almost completely by the end of Covid stimulus.

那么这种情况会变得更好还是更糟呢?

View/Hide Original English

So will this situation get better or worse?

嗯,我们永远无法确定。

View/Hide Original English

Well, we can never know for sure.

从乐观的角度来看,我们过去曾看到技术实际上创造了更多就业机会。

View/Hide Original English

On the optimistic side, we have seen in the past that technologies have actually created more jobs, Sometimes.

然而,这些机会的出现需要时间,所以我确实认为有充分的理由抱有希望,我们还没有看到AI一些更微妙的好处。

View/Hide Original English

It took time for these to develop though, so I do think there is good reason to be hopeful that we haven't seen some of these more subtle benefits of AI yet.

但老实说,我的预期是,随着我们进入一个多极世界秩序,地缘政治不确定性只会变得更糟。

View/Hide Original English

But honestly, my expectation is that geopolitical uncertainty will only get worse as we enter a multipolar world order.

最重要的是,AI的采用可能首先会导致更多的失业。

View/Hide Original English

On top of that, AI adoption will likely first lead to more job losses.

而且由于政府债务如此之高,社会迅速老龄化,我当然认为我们不太可能很快再次看到像疫情期间那样水平的政府刺激措施。

View/Hide Original English

And with government debt so high and societies quickly aging, I certainly think it's unlikely we will see more government stimulus on the level as we saw during Covid again soon.

所以我认为就业市场不太可能很快好转。

View/Hide Original English

So I think it's unlikely that the job market will get much better soon.

但是,你觉得呢?

View/Hide Original English

But yeah, what do you think?

请在下面的评论中告诉我。

View/Hide Original English

Let me know in the comments below.

如果你已经将隐私作为生活中的优先事项,请考虑通过下面的链接查看我们的赞助商Cape,更进一步。

View/Hide Original English

And if you are already making privacy a priority in your life, consider going the extra mile by checking out our sponsor Cape using the link below.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织